Finding Mentors and Forging Connections in the Brain Cancer Field

Commentary
Video

The act of asking for help is critical to finding mentors who can help one advance in the brain cancer field, according to Yoshie Umemura, MD.

Yoshie Umemura, MD, spoke with CancerNetwork® about advice she would offer to aspiring neuro-oncologists who aim to progress in the brain cancer field. Specifically, she focused on what to look out for in terms of mentorship.

Above all else, Umemura, the chief medical officer of the Ivy Brain Tumor Center, division chief of Neuro-Oncology, and the William and Joan Shapiro chair of Neuro-Oncology at Barrow Neurological Institute, emphasized having the confidence to ask others outside of one’s institution to form new connections and mentorships. Additionally, she described how those in the field can pay it forward by being open to mentoring other aspiring neuro-oncologists.

Transcript:

I have spoken with some people who felt they lacked a mentor. The common things I hear are, “Oh, there wasn’t anyone like that at my institution.” The best advice I can give them is to just ask. When you are at a conference and you meet someone, you think you might click with, you’re intrigued about, or you’re impressed with, you can shoot an email and ask them if they would be open to chatting with you about a question or mentoring you. I have multiple mentors outside of my institution, and I have been very fortunate to have them. At the same time, I’ve asked [them]. The worst thing that’s going to happen is they [may be] too busy, right? No one is going to make you feel terrible about yourself just because you showed an initiative to get a mentor. [You should also] pay it forward. Always be open to mentoring others; that’s the only way to move forward. Don’t limit yourself to just what’s around you. It [speaks] to the collaborative aspect and how to operate as an outsider. You’re not an outsider as long as you make the connection; you can just wedge yourself in. Just ask.

Recent Videos
Harmonizing protocols across the health care system may bolster the feasibility of giving bispecifics to those with lymphoma in a community setting.
Patients who face smoking stigma, perceive a lack of insurance, or have other low-dose CT related concerns may benefit from blood testing for lung cancer.
Establishment of an AYA Lymphoma Consortium has facilitated a process to better understand and address gaps in knowledge for this patient group.
Adult and pediatric oncology collaboration in assessing nivolumab in advanced Hodgkin lymphoma facilitated the phase 3 SWOG S1826 findings.
Treatment paradigms differ between adult and pediatric oncologists when treating young adults with lymphoma.
Differences in pancreatic cancer responses to treatment elicits a need to better educate patients on expectations in treatment, particularly chemotherapy.
Increasing patient awareness of modifiable risk factors for pancreatic cancer may help mitigate incidence of pancreatic cancers.
It may be crucial to test every patient for markers such as BRAF V600E mutations, NRG1 fusions, and KRAS G12C mutations to help manage pancreatic cancers.
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD, emphasizes the idea of moving targeted therapies to earlier lines of treatment to further improve outcomes in pancreatic cancer.
The Together for Supportive Cancer Care coalition may advance the national conversation in ensuring comprehensive care for all patients with cancer.