Fixed Duration Venetoclax/Rituximab Combo May Prolong Disease Control in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

News
Article

Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia treated with fixed duration venetoclax/rituximab may experience prolonged disease control vs bendamustine/rituximab.

Fixed duration treatment with venetoclax/rituximab (VenR) for chronic lymphocytic leukemia resulted in significantly lower median minimal residual disease (MRD) levels and prolonged disease control compared with those treated with bendamustine/rituximab, according to results from an MRD model from the phase 3 MURANO trial (NCT02005471).

These results come from the 2021 American Society of Hematology Annual Conference. Patients with an IGVH (P = .79) or TP53 (P = .48) mutation who were treated with VenR showed no significant difference in MRD at the end of treatment. Patients treated with bendamustine/rituximab who had a TP53 mutation had significantly higher median MRD levels at the end of treatment than who were TP53-wild type (3.07 x 10-2 vs 1.94x10-2; P = .002).

In the previously reported 5-year update of the trial, investigators found that survival benefit associated with VenR treatment was sustained 3 years following the end of treatment. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 53.6 months in the VenR arm and 17.0 months in the bendamustine/rituximab arm (P <.0001). Additionally, the 5-year PFS rate was 37.8% in the VenR arm and not estimable in the bendamustine/rituximab arm. Moreover, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 82.1% vs 62.2% in both arms, respectively (P <.0001). Investigators reported that 38.6% of patients in the VenR arm had undetectable MRD without progressive disease at 3-years; the 3-year OS rate was 95.3%.

A total of 389 patients were randomized 1:1 in this trial. Patients were given a 5-week ramp-up dose of venetoclax ranging from 20 mg to 400 mg. Patients were then randomized to either the VenR group (n = 194) and given venetoclax at 400 mg daily or rituximab at either 375 mg/m2 or 500 mg/m2. Alternatively, patients were randomized to the bendamustine/rituximab group (n = 195) and received either 70 mg/m2 of bendamustine or 375 mg/m2 or 500 mg/m2 of rituximab.

The full analysis included 91 patients in the VenR arm and 120 patients in the bendamustine/rituximab arm.

In the VenR arm, 47 patients were younger than 65 years, 18 had a TP53 mutation, 16 had del(17p) and 35 patients had received 2 or more lines of therapy. In the bendamustine/rituximab group, 45 patients were younger than 65, 22 had a TP53 mutation, 18 had del(17p), and 40 had 2 or more lines of prior therapy.

Investigators reported that patients in the VenR group had a significantly longer median MRD doubling time of 93 days compared with 53 days in the bendamustine/rituximab group. The longer doubling time may notably be predictive of a longer PFS and was seen in both VenR (P = 2 x 10-8) and bendamustine/rituximab (P = .001) arms, respectively. Factors that significantly impacted the MRD growth rate included age, VenR treatment, IGHV, TP53 mutation, and tumor lysis syndrome risk at study initiation.

Investigators also observed a numerical shift in time from undetectable to positive MRD conversation that was supported by the MRD growth model. Among those with IGHV mutations (n = 23), 56.5% of patients experienced conversion at a median of 22.6 months (95% CI, 8.1–not evaluable [NE]), and in the IGHV-unmutated (n = 56) subgroup, 64.3% of patients converted at a median of 18.2 months (95% CI, 8.4-28.0). In the subgroup with TP53 wild-type (n = 69) disease, 60.9% of patients experienced conversion at a median of 22.3 months (95% CI, 8.6-28.4); in the TP53-mutated group (n = 13), 69.2% of patients experienced conversion at a median 18.2 months (95% CI, 8.3-NE). Among Forty-five patients who were 65 years or older, 55.6% experienced conversion at a median of 22.6 months (95% CI, 8.7-NE), and 68.4% of 38 patients younger than 65 year experienced conversion at a median of 15.2 months (95% CI, 8.4-28.0).

“These results suggest that, compared with chemoimmunotherapy, fixed-duration venetoclax plus anti-CD20 therapy may contribute to prolonged CLL disease control by slowing the growth of the residual disease clone’s post-treatment cessation,” the investigators concluded.

Reference

Kater A, Lu T, Langeral A, et al. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) clonal growth rate is slower following venetoclax-rituximab (VenR): results from a minimal residual disease (MRD) model from the randomized phase 3 MURANO trial. Blood. 2021;138(suppl 1):1551. doi.10.1182/blood-2021-148612

Recent Videos
Compared with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, asciminib was better tolerated in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Bulkiness of disease did not appear to impact PFS outcomes with ibrutinib plus venetoclax in the phase 2 CAPTIVATE study.
A panel of 3 experts on CML
A panel of 3 experts on CML
A panel of 3 experts on CML
A panel of 3 experts on CML
A panel of 3 experts on CML
A panel of 3 experts on CML
A panel of 3 experts on CML
A panel of 3 experts on CML
Related Content