Frontline ASKB589 Combo Shows Efficacy, Safety in Gastric/GEJ Cancer

News
Article

Combining ASKB589 with capecitabine, capecitabine, and sintilimab leads to no treatment discontinuation due to adverse effects among patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer in a phase 1/2 trial.

No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed, and patients received the agent at 6 mg/kg in the dose-expansion portion of the trial.

No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed, and patients received the agent at 6 mg/kg in the dose-expansion portion of the trial.

ASK589, a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting CLDN18.2, plus capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) as well as sintilimab (Tyvyt) yielded safety and encouraging anti-tumor activity as first-line treatment for those with gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer, according to findings from a phase 1/2 trial (NCT05632939) presented at the 2024 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium.1

In the dose-escalation and dose expansion study, the disease control rate among patients with measurable CLDN18.2 moderate or high disease who received 6 mg/kg of ASKB589 plus CAPOX and sintilimab (n = 45) was 100%. Additionally, 80% of patients achieved a partial response and 20% of patients experienced stable disease. At the data cutoff, among patients who received ASKB589 at 6 mg/kg (n = 53), 77.3% were ongoing treatment and there were no treatment discontinuations due to adverse effects (AEs) related to ASKB589 in the trial.

Patients with locally advanced, relapsed and metastatic gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma who were not candidates for surgery or radical radiotherapy received ASKB589 at 10.0 mg/kg (n = 6) or 6.0 mg/kg (n = 3) plus CAPOX and sintilimab in the dose-escalation 3+3 designed portion of the study. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed, and patients received the agent at 6 mg/kg in the dose-expansion portion of the trial.1

A phase 3 trial has also been approved for initiation in China to the evaluate this combination in patients with gastric or GEJ cancers.2

The primary end points of the study included identification of the maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase 3 dose, safety and tolerability, and DLTs. Secondary end points included characterization of the pharmacokinetics, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Patients enrolled had an ECOG performance score of 0 or 1; adequate bone marrow, heart, liver, and renal function; an expected survival of at least 3 months; and had CLDN18.2-positive disease. Further, chemotherapy plus immunotherapy had to be suitable as a first-line treatment or patients could have experienced progression following 6 months of chemotherapy.1

The median age of all patients in the trial (n = 62) was 59.0 years (range, 30-75) and most patients were male (66.1%). Additionally, most patients had an ECOG performance score of 1 (66.1%), 0 to 2 sites of metastases (75.8%), gastric cancer (87.1%) as opposed to GEJ (12.9%), and had not received prior gastrectomy (88.7%). Lauren types included diffuse (17.7%), intestinal (14.5%), mixed (8.1%), and unknown (59.7%), and patients had PD-L1 combined positive scores of less than 1 (40.3%), 1 to 5 (22.6%), and 5 or higher (37.1%).1

Patients had CLDN18.2 expression that was low (16.1%), moderate (21.0%), and high (62.9%) and was assessed using the IHC DS-3 LDT assay on the Leica BOND-III autostainer platform. Investigators noted that high comparability was observed with CLDN18.2 staining by DS-3 and 43-14A.

At the 6 mg/kg dose, 94.6% of patients expereinced an any grade treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) and 42.9% experienced a grade 3 or higher TEAE; these respective rates were 100.0% and 16.7% at the 10 mg/kg dose. The most common any-grade TEAEs occurring at the 2 dose levels were hypoalbuminemia (76.8% vs 83.3%, respectively), nausea (66.1% vs 66.7%), anemia (55.4% vs 66.7%), decreased neutrophil count (55.4% vs 50.0%), vomiting (53.6% vs 33.3%), hypocalcemia (42.9% vs 50.0%), decreased leukocyte count (37.5% vs 50.0%), decreased weight (33.9% vs 50.0%), increased aspartate aminotransferase level (33.9% vs 16.7%), and decreased platelet count (26.8% vs 66.7%), among others.

TEAEs of grade 3 or greater in the 6 mg/kg group included decreased neutrophil count (16.1%), vomiting (7.1%), hypocalcemia (5.4%), decreased platelet count (5.4%), fatigue (3.6%), hypokalemia (3.6%), anemia (3.6%), decreased appetite (3.6%), and decreased leukocyte count (1.8%). The only grade 3 or higher TEAE patients who received the 10 mg/kg dose experienced was decreased neutrophil count (16.1%).1

References

  1. Peng Z, He Y, Chen J, Hickingbottom B, Lu J, Shen L. A phase lb/ll study of ASKB589 (anti-CLDN18.2 monoclonal antibody) in combination with CAPOX and PD-1 inhibitor as a first-line treatment of locally advanced, relapsed and metastatic G/GEJ cancer (NCT05632939). J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(suppl 3):317. doi:10.1200/JCO.2024.42.3_suppl.317
  2. AskGene Pharma received clearance to commence pivotal phase III clinical trial in China for ASKB589. News release. AskGene Pharma. October 16, 2023. Accessed January 18, 2024. https://ask-gene.com/askgene-pharma-received-clearance-to-commence-pivotal-phase-iii-clinical-trial-in-china-for
Recent Videos
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Compared with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, asciminib was better tolerated in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Using bispecific antibodies before or after CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma is an area of education for community oncologists.
Bulkiness of disease did not appear to impact PFS outcomes with ibrutinib plus venetoclax in the phase 2 CAPTIVATE study.
Optimal cancer survivorship care may entail collaboration between a treating oncologist and a cancer survivorship expert.
Related Content