Gender Equity in Hematology/Oncology Have We Made Any Progress?

News
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 38, Issue 11
Volume 38
Issue 11
Pages: 406

Julie M. Vose, MD, MBA, highlights the push toward gender diversity in medical oncology.

Julie M. Vose, MD, MBA, George and Peggy Payne Distinguished Chair of Oncology, Chief, Hematology/Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center

Julie M. Vose, MD, MBA, George and Peggy Payne Distinguished Chair of Oncology, Chief, Hematology/Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center

There has been growth in the representation of women in many areas of medicine. For example, in 2017, for the first time, more women than men matriculated into United States medical schools.1 However, women remain underrepresented in academic medicine as well as leadership positions in academic medicine.2 The theory has been that it just takes time for women to go through the ranks and they can gain representation as time goes on. Although this has happened to some degree, with the major increase in women going through medical training, more representation would be expected at this point.

In hematology/oncology, this trend is evident, with slow improvements over the past several decades. For example, of the 59 presidents of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), only 9 have been women. However, 4 of the past 10 have been women. Such slow improvement is evident at every level of academic oncology, especially over the past decade. Another example is the exceptionally low level of representation of women on editorial boards of major medical journals, and the near total lack of women as editors-in-chief for major oncology journals.3 The lack of women in these positions is multifactorial and individual for each situation. However, the modifiable determinants should be addressed on an individual basis. When positions become available, a broad net should be cast for applicants, with specific outreach to qualified candidates in underrepresented categories.

In some exceptional circumstances, traditional expectations need to be modernized to meet candidates’ needs. This could include flexible hours, improved clinical or administrative support, or a modified career plan timeline considering family and personal needs. The one-size-fits-all academic and clinical entity approach does not work well for the diversification of physicians or the growth of the hematology/oncology specialty. It is incumbent on the few women in leadership positions in hematology/oncology to change the trajectory for the future of women in the field.


Breaking Barriers: Women in Oncology is a program designed to highlight accomplishments, express challenges, and share advice across the oncology field. Visit our website to read about career journeys across the cancer space at https://www.cancernetwork.com/breaking-barriers

Breaking Barriers: Women in Oncology is a program designed to highlight accomplishments, express challenges, and share advice across the oncology field. Visit our website to read about career journeys across the cancer space at https://www.cancernetwork.com/breaking-barriers

References

  1. 1. More women than men enrolled in U.S. medical schools in 2017. News release. Association of American Medical Colleges. December 17, 2017. Accessed October 23, 2024.https://tinyurl.com/bd3k7jhh
  2. 2. Chowdhary M, Chowdhary A, Royce TJ, et al. Women’s representation in leadership positions in academic medical oncology, radiation oncology, and surgical oncology programs. JAMA New Open. 2020; 3(3):e20078. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0708
  3. 3. Jasgi R, Tarbell NJ, Henault LE, Chang Y, Hylek EM. The representation of women on the editorial boards of major medical journals: a 35-year perspective. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(5):544-568. doi:10.1001/archinte.168.5.544
Recent Videos
The Together for Supportive Cancer Care coalition may advance the national conversation in ensuring comprehensive care for all patients with cancer.
Health care organizations have come together to form the Together for Supportive Cancer Care coalition to address gaps in supportive cancer care services.
Further optimizing a PROTAC that targets MDM2 may lead to human clinical trials among patients with cancer harboring p53 mutations.
Subsequent testing among patients in a prospective study may affirm the ability of cfDNA sequencing to detect cancers in those with Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
cfDNA sequencing may allow for more accessible, frequent, and sensitive testing compared with standard surveillance in Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
STX-478 showed efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors regardless of whether they had kinase domain or helical PI3K mutations.
STX-478 may avoid adverse effects associated with prior PI3K inhibitors that lack selectivity for the mutated protein vs the wild-type protein.
Phase 1 data may show the possibility of rationally designing agents that can preferentially target PI3K mutations in solid tumors.
Funding a clinical trial to further assess liquid biopsy in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome may help with detecting cancers early across the board.
Michael J. Hall, MD, MS, FASCO, discusses the need to reduce barriers to care for those with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, including those who live in rural areas.