High-Risk Early RCC May Benefit from Neoadjuvant Avelumab Plus Axitinib

Article

Data from the NeoAvAx trial presented at 2022 ASCO GU show potential for neoadjuvant avelumab plus axitinib for high-risk, non-metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma.

Results of the phase 2 NeoAvAx trial (NCT03341845) presented during the 2022 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium indicated that the neoadjuvant combination of avelumab (Bavencio) plus axitinib (Inlyta) has potential for use in patients with high-risk, non-metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC).1

In the open-label, single-arm study, the neoadjuvant PD-1/tyrosine kinase inhibitor regimen induced a partial response in 12 (30%) of 40 patients. Median primary tumor downsizing was 20% (range, +3.8%­ to 43.5%). Among patients with a partial response, 10 of 12 were disease-free at the study data cutoff. At a median follow-up of 23.5 months, the median overall survival (OS) and median disease-free survival (DFS) had not yet been reached. No patients had progression of their primary tumor.

“This is the first neoadjuvant trial reporting results from a combination of an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and VEGFR-TKI for locally advanced high-risk RCC,” said lead study author Axel Bex, MD, PhD, of the Netherlands Cancer Institute.“The DFS data are encouraging, supporting further evaluation, although currently there are no randomized neoadjuvant versus adjuvant ICI trials or neoadjuvant versus adjuvant ICI/VEGFR-TKI combination [trials in this setting].”

Explaining the background of the NeoAvAx trial, Bex said, “Antibodies targeting PD-1/PD-L1 combined with VEGF inhibitors are a first-line standard of care for metastatic RCC. Neoadjuvant use of these combinations may lead to downstaging and reduce the risk of recurrence.”

Overall, there were 40 patients enrolled in the trial between May 2018 and October 2021.

The median patient age was 63 years (range, 47-74), 30% of patients were female, and 70% of patients were male. The World Health Organization performance status was 0 for 30 patients and 1 for 10 patients.

Baseline cTNMwere as follows: T1b-T2b (n = 4), T3a (n = 24), T3b (n = 4), T4 (n = 8). “Ninety percent of the patients had at least a T3 stage disease and higher,” noted

Bex. Biopsy grades were G1-2 (n = 27), G3-4 (n = 11), and Gx (n = 2).

Across the population, 42.5% (n = 17) of patients were clinically node positive. “Baseline lymph node diameter was a mean of 2.6 cm and the mean diameter of the primary tumor was 10.3 cm, so by no means was this a low-risk or intermediate-risk population,” explained Bex.

Study dosing was axitinib at 5 mg twice daily and avelumab at 10mg/kg every 2 weeks. The primary end point was partial response at week 12. Secondary endpoints included DFS, OS, and safety, and biomarker analysis on sequential tissue was an exploratory end point.

Overall, 13 (32.5%) patients had disease recurrence and 3 patients died of disease.

Bex said there were no new safety signals with the neoadjuvant regimen as compared with previously reported safety data for axitinib and avelumab. The majority of adverse events (AEs) were grade 1/2. There were 6 total grade 3 AEs, comprising 1 case each of hypertension, infusion-related reaction, fatigue, nausea, hand-foot syndrome, and elevated liver function tests.

Addressing the safety profile of the subsequent surgery patients received after the neoadjuvant regimen, Bex said, “Surgical adverse events were as expected in this patient population with locally advanced RCC.”

Bex also summarized the investigator findings from the exploratory biomarker analysis: “With regards to biomarkers, patients with recurrence had lower CD8+ densities after treatment compared to patients without recurrence. Spatial transcriptomics of post-treatment primary tumor tissue revealed focal intratumoral differences in immune signatures and we are currently investigating this further to see whether this may be one of the reasons why these patients have recurrence.”

The combination of avelumab and axitinib is currently approved by the FDA for the frontline treatment of patients with advanced RCC. The approval was based on results from the pivotal phase III JAVELIN Renal 101 trial, which showed that the combination was associated with a 31% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death compared with sunitinib (Sutent) in patients with treatment-naïve advanced RCC.2

References

  1. Bex A, Abu-Ghanem Y, van Thienen JV, et al. Efficacy, safety, and biomarker analysis of neoadjuvant avelumab/axitinib in patients (pts) with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who are at high risk of relapse after nephrectomy (NeoAvAx). J Clin Oncol. 2022;(suppl 6):289. 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.6_suppl.289
  2. FDA Approves Bavencio (Avelumab) Plus Inlyta (Axitinib) Combination for Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. Pfizer Oncology. Published May 14, 2019. Accessed February 20, 2022. https://on.pfizer.com/2HtdCzF
Recent Videos
An “avalanche of funding” has propelled the kidney cancer field forward, says Jason Muhitch, PhD.
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Kidney cancer advocacy efforts have spread the urgency and importance of funding research in the field to members of Congress.
Advocacy efforts have yielded a dramatic increase in kidney cancer research, according to Elizabeth P. Henske, MD.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Compared with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, asciminib was better tolerated in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Related Content