Jennifer A. Woyach, MD, on Updated Results of the AO41202 Trial Testing Ibrutinib Regimens in CLL at ASH 2021

News
Video

Jennifer A. Woyach, MD, spoke about the results of a study conducted in elderly patients treated with an ibrutinib-containing regimen for chronic lymphocytic leukemia at 55 months of follow-up.

During the 2021 American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting, Jennifer A. Woyach, MD, associate professor in the Division of Hematology at The Ohio State University, discussed follow-up results to the phase 3 AO41202 study (NCT01886872), in which single-agent ibrutinib (Imbruvica) or an ibrutinib-containing regimen yielded superior results compared with the bendamustine-plus-rituximab (Rituxan) regimen for patients over the age of 65 years with untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Transcript:

At the 55-month follow-up, we saw that the results continued to show an advantage for the 2 ibrutinib-containing regimens over bendamustine and rituximab at 48 months. Over three-quarters of patients treated with either ibrutinib or ibrutinib plus rituximab remain progression free, and less than 50% of those treated with bendamustine and rituximab are progression free at that same time.

We see no difference between the 2 ibrutinib-containing regimens showing that rituximab does not add benefit to ibrutinib when given in this manner. We still do not see a difference in overall survival among the 3 treatment arms, which is to be expected as a study has a crossover design, so patients who were enrolled in the bendamustine-and-rituximab arm, once they progress, can cross over to ibrutinib given as a single agent.

When we look at subgroup analyses, we again see that all patient groups really benefit from the ibrutinib regimens compared with bendamustine plus rituximab. We see a greater magnitude of benefit for patients with higher-risk disease, those with 17p deletion, those with complex karyotype, and those with unmethylated ZAP-70 which we use as a surrogate for unmutated immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene variable region somatic hypermutation [IGHV]. Those patients all seem to have the most benefit from ibrutinib versus chemoimmunotherapy. We do see benefits to the ibrutinib regimens across all subgroups.

We also looked at some of the special adverse [effects] that we see with ibrutinib, namely hypertension and atrial fibrillation. As we’ve seen before in some retrospective studies, we do see that patients continue to get atrial fibrillation and continue to get hypertension as they’re treated for long periods of time. With atrial fibrillation, specifically, we have about a 15% incidence of atrial fibrillation at 36 months. This is one toxicity that does appear to be higher in patients who are older than patients were younger.

Reference

Woyach JA, Ruppert AS, Heerema NA, et al. Long-term results of Alliance AO41202 show continued advantage of ibrutinib-based regimens compared with bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) chemoimmunotherapy. Presented at: 63rd American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting; December 11-13, 2021; Atlanta, GA. Accessed December 6, 2021. https://bit.ly/31EcBlO

Recent Videos
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Compared with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, asciminib was better tolerated in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Using bispecific antibodies before or after CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma is an area of education for community oncologists.
Bulkiness of disease did not appear to impact PFS outcomes with ibrutinib plus venetoclax in the phase 2 CAPTIVATE study.
Optimal cancer survivorship care may entail collaboration between a treating oncologist and a cancer survivorship expert.
Related Content