Low-Dose Liposomal Amphotericin Effective in Aspergillosis

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 5 No 11
Volume 5
Issue 11

NEW ORLEANS-High doses of liposomal amphotericin B are no more effective than low doses in the treatment of invasive aspergillosis in neutropenic patients, European researchers reported at the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

NEW ORLEANS—High doses of liposomal amphotericin B are no more effective than low doses in the treatment of invasive aspergillosis in neutropenic patients, European researchers reported at the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

Dr. Michael Ellis, of the HCI Internal Medicine Center, Glasgow, gave an interim analysis of the first 70 of 119 neutropenic cancer patients from 18 European institutions.

Patients received either low-dose (1 mg/kg) or high-dose (4 mg/kg) liposomal amphotericin B for a median of 20 and 19 days, and a total of 1,260 mg and 4,020 mg of drug, respectively.

Age, sex, performance status, and underlying disease were similar for the two groups. Definite invasive disease was present in 31% of low-dose and 23% of high-dose patients; all other cases were presumptive. Aspergillus fumigatus was the most common pathogen, and the lung was the most common site of infection, usually showing multiple bilateral lesions.

At the end of treatment, a partial or complete clinical response was seen in 68% of low-dose and 49% of high-dose patients. Radiologic response was noted for 63% and 54%, respectively. Overall survival was similar, as was mortality due to invasive aspergillosis (33% low-dose; 28% high-dose). Mortality caused by underlying disease was twice as high in the high-dose group, he said.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
4 experts in this video
2 experts in this video
2 experts in this video
4 experts in this video
Ongoing studies seek to evaluate immunotherapy in earlier lines of therapy for patients with early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma.
Strict inclusion criteria may disproportionately exclude racial minority populations from participating in breast cancer trials.
A paucity of prospective, well-vetted data to guide therapy in patients with rare lymphomas may result in a reliance on expert consensus guidelines.
Related Content