Luciano Costa, MD, PhD, Discusses How his Institution Handled the COVID-19 Pandemic

Video

CancerNetwork® sat down with Luciano Costa, MD, PhD, at the 2021 International Myeloma Workshop to talk about how the COVID-19 pandemic affected his work and how they adapted.

At the 2021 International Myeloma Workshop, CancerNetwork® spoke with Luciano Costa, MD, PhD, of O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, about how the COVID-19 pandemic initially impacted clinical trial participation at his institution and how they have since evolved to adapt to a new normal. 

Transcript:

At the beginning of the pandemic, like everybody else, we faced a lot of uncertainty and reacted to that very conservatively. We had an [incremental increase] in telehealth visits, and we established mandatory testing for our invasive procedures. Of course, we implemented universal masking, gloving, and social distancing in our waiting areas and so forth. Thanks to a lot of coordination and hard work from the front-end research and support teams in the front of the institution, we were able to not badly hurt our operations, never stopped taking new patients, and we never stopped therapy of any sorts. [We also] never stopped doing transplant [and] we never stopped enrolling patients into clinical trials. [I’m not saying] that those things have gone normally; especially the clinical trial activities have become very challenging. At the beginning of the pandemic, patients were very reluctant to embrace a new therapy, or embrace uncertainty. They were already surrounded by so much uncertainty of the pandemic itself. Over time, that has gotten a lot better, but there [are] still some challenges from all the turnover that has happened to the workforce. Nowadays, our volumes are normal. We still have some room to improve in terms of normalizing our clinical trial operations.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Future research will aim to assess the efficacy of PIPAC-MMC plus systemic therapy vs systemic therapy alone in patients with peritoneal tumors.
Although small incision surgery may serve as a conduit to deliver PIPAC-MMC, it may confer benefits in the staging and treatment of peritoneal tumors.
Patients with peritoneal metastases were historically associated with limited survival and low consideration for clinical trials.
Findings from the OVARIO study show that patients with HRR–deficient and BRCA-mutated disease benefitted the most from niraparib/bevacizumab maintenance.
Select comorbidities, ECOG status, and the receipt of radiation were among the differences between a real-world cohort and the RUBY trial population.
Related Content