NICE says no to expensive kidney cancer drugs

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 17 No 9
Volume 17
Issue 9

The advisory committee tothe UK’s National Health Service(NHS) has recommended that theNHS not pay for four new agentsproven effective in metastatic renalcell carcinoma. The four drugs arebevacizumab (Avastin), sorafenib(Nexavar), sunitinib (Sutent), andtemsirolimus (Torisel).

The advisory committee to the UK’s National Health Service (NHS) has recommended that the NHS not pay for four new agents proven effective in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The four drugs are bevacizumab (Avastin), sorafenib (Nexavar), sunitinib (Sutent), and temsirolimus (Torisel).

In a written statement, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) stressed that their vote against the four agents is a preliminary one; the final guidance to the NHS will be rendered later this month and after public input.

Professor Peter Littlejohns, clinical and public health director for NICE, explained that “bevacizumab, sorafenib, sunitinib, or temsirolimus have the potential to extend progression-free survival (in renal cancer patients), but at a cost of £20,000- £35,000 per patient per year...although these treatments are clinically effective, they are not a cost-effective use of NHS resources.”

However, Professor Littlejohns said that NICE would consider proposals from the drugs manufacturers- Bayer/Onyx, Pfizer, Roche, and Wyeth-for reducing the cost of the drugs. To read the draft guidance, go to: http:// www.nice.org.uk/guidance/index. jsp?action=byID&o=11817

In an interview with a UK newspaper, Sir Michael Rawlins, NICE chairman, accused drug companies of driving up the price of medicines. Professor Rawlins said that pharmaceutical companies are too focused on maintaining profits, supporting marketing, and cushioning themselves against competition when patents expire (BBC News, August 17, 2008).

Recent Videos
A review of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma shows radiological tumor burden as an independent prognostic factor for survival.
A phase 2 trial is assessing ubamatamab in patients with MUC16-expressing SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma and epithelioid sarcoma.
Analysis of 2 phase 1 trials compared gut biome diversity between standard of care with or without CBM588 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Although no responses were observed in 11 patients receiving abemaciclib monotherapy, combination therapies with abemaciclib may offer clinical benefit.
Findings show no difference in overall survival between various treatments for metastatic RCC previously managed with immunotherapy and TKIs.
An epigenomic profiling approach may help pick up the entire tumor burden, thereby assisting with detecting sarcomatoid features in those with RCC.
Ongoing research may clarify the potential benefit of avelumab when administered in combination with other agents in advanced urothelial carcinoma.
Spatial analyses may help determine factors that influence responses to sacituzumab govitecan-containing regimens in urothelial carcinoma.
Attending educational sessions may help with understanding how to manage toxicities associated with enfortumab vedotin in rare genitourinary cancers.
Related Content