Precise resection in colon cancer may boost survival

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 17 No 9
Volume 17
Issue 9

Researchers from the Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine at the University of Leeds assessed the quality of colon cancer surgery and noted that there was marked variability in the plane of surgery achieved in colon cancer.

Researchers from the Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine at the University of Leeds assessed the quality of colon cancer surgery and noted that there was marked variability in the plane of surgery achieved in colon cancer.

 

Improving the plane of dissection might improve survival, particularly in patients with stage III disease, they said.

 

The group, led by Professor Philip Quirke, performed an observational study of all resections for primary colon adenocarcinoma done at Leeds General Infirmary between 1997 and 2002. The specimens were photographed and graded according to the plane of mesocolic dissection. Tissue morphometry was done on 253 tumors. Univariate and multivariate models were used to ascertain whether there was an association with 5-year survival. The primary outcome measure was overall survival defined as death from any cause.

 

The study sample ultimately consisted of 399 specimens. They found “marked variation in the proportion of each plane of surgery: muscularis propria in 95 of 399 (24%) specimens, intramesocolic in 177 of 399 (44%) specimens, and mesocolic in 127 of 399 (32%) specimens” (Lancet Oncology online, July 28, 2008).

They also found that the mean cross-sectional tissue area outside the muscularis propria was significantly higher with mesocolic plane surgery, compared with intramesocolic and muscularis propria plane surgery.

 

Finally, they noted that, independent of all tumor sites, there was also a significant increase in the distance from the muscularis propria to the mesocolic resection margin with mesocolic plane surgery compared with intramesocolic and muscularis propria plane surgery.

 

“The plane of surgery and amount of mesocolon removed varied between the different sites with better planes in left-sided resections than right-sided ones, which were better than transverse resection,” they commented.

 

In univariate analysis, they calculated a 15% overall survival advantage at 5 years with mesocolic plane surgery compared with surgery in the muscularis propria plane, especially in patients with stage III cancers, but this association lost significance in the multivariate model.

 

“We have now shown there is marked variability in the plane of surgery achieved in colon cancer. Improving the plane of dissection might improve survival, especially in patients with stage III disease,” they concluded.

 

These results may be confirmed by clinical trial data from the National Cancer Research Institute’s Fluoropyrimidine, Oxaliplatin and Targeted Receptor pre-Operative Therapy for colon cancer (FOxTROT) trial.

 

FOxTROT is a trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced resectable colon cancer.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Treatment with KRAS inhibitors may help mitigate a common driver of genetic alteration across a majority of pancreatic cancers.
Various methods of communication ensure that members from radiation oncology, pathology, and other departments are on the same page regarding treatment.
Updated results from the BREAKWATER study seemed to be most impactful to the CRC space, according to Michael J. Pishvaian, MD, PhD.
Providing easier access to ancillary services for patients with PDAC who live farther away from the treatment center may help them complete the treatment regimen.
Future research will aim to assess the efficacy of PIPAC-MMC plus systemic therapy vs systemic therapy alone in patients with peritoneal tumors.
Although small incision surgery may serve as a conduit to deliver PIPAC-MMC, it may confer benefits in the staging and treatment of peritoneal tumors.
Patients with peritoneal metastases were historically associated with limited survival and low consideration for clinical trials.
Related Content