Niraparib May Show “Meaningful” Benefits in MGMT Unmethylated Glioblastoma

Commentary
Video

The phase 3 Gliofocus trial aims to meaningfully improve survival and quality of life with niraparib among patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

In a conversation with CancerNetwork®, Nader Sanai, MD, discussed how the assessment of niraparib (Zejula) in the phase 3 Gliofocus trial (NCT06388733) may lead to “meaningful” outcomes among patients with newly diagnosed unmethylated MGMT glioblastoma.

Sanai, director of the Ivy Brain Tumor Center and J.N Harber Professor of Neurological Surgery, Francis and Dionne Najafi chair for Neurosurgical Oncology, and chief of neurological oncology at Barrow Neurological Institute, described his aim to set a clinically relevant benchmark for patients and providers through the Gliofocus trial. Through this study, investigators look to improve upon historical rates of survival with standard-of-care options among those with unmethylated disease while eliciting a quality-of-life advantage using niraparib.

Transcript:

The field is starving for progress, but patients and providers don’t just want any kind of progress. They’re looking for something that’s clinically meaningful from a quality-of-life perspective, not just a statistical advantage of marginal value. If you look at the large data sets for [patients with] unmethylated glioblastoma getting standard of care, which we call the Stupp protocol—surgery followed by temozolomide plus radiation concomitantly—those patients have a median overall survival of [approximately] 12 months, which is far lower than the average for all [patients with] glioblastoma together, which is closer to 16 months.

What we’re really looking to do with this trial is set a benchmark that’s clinically relevant for patients and providers. The overall survival target for the study is 18 months, which is to effectively convert that 12-month natural history to a natural history closer to the methylated glioblastoma population. We think that is a very meaningful transformation of a very difficult patient population, a significant chunk of survival time that would be beneficial to patients, providers, and caregivers. Importantly, [it may also mean] an advantage for quality of life, which is of paramount importance for this patient population.

Reference

A study comparing niraparib with temozolomide in adult participants with newly-diagnosed, MGMT unmethylated glioblastoma. ClinicalTrials.gov. Updated June 24, 2024. Accessed August 27, 2024. https://tinyurl.com/y25er8p9

Recent Videos
Harmonizing protocols across the health care system may bolster the feasibility of giving bispecifics to those with lymphoma in a community setting.
Patients who face smoking stigma, perceive a lack of insurance, or have other low-dose CT related concerns may benefit from blood testing for lung cancer.
Establishment of an AYA Lymphoma Consortium has facilitated a process to better understand and address gaps in knowledge for this patient group.
Adult and pediatric oncology collaboration in assessing nivolumab in advanced Hodgkin lymphoma facilitated the phase 3 SWOG S1826 findings.
Treatment paradigms differ between adult and pediatric oncologists when treating young adults with lymphoma.
Differences in pancreatic cancer responses to treatment elicits a need to better educate patients on expectations in treatment, particularly chemotherapy.
Increasing patient awareness of modifiable risk factors for pancreatic cancer may help mitigate incidence of pancreatic cancers.
It may be crucial to test every patient for markers such as BRAF V600E mutations, NRG1 fusions, and KRAS G12C mutations to help manage pancreatic cancers.
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD, emphasizes the idea of moving targeted therapies to earlier lines of treatment to further improve outcomes in pancreatic cancer.
The Together for Supportive Cancer Care coalition may advance the national conversation in ensuring comprehensive care for all patients with cancer.