Oncology Peer Review On-The-Go: BPCIA, 4-Letter Suffix Rule, & the Challenges of Prescribing Biosimilars

Podcast

CancerNetwork®’s podcast hosted 2 experts to discuss the current state of biosimilar prescriptions and the need for change to improve the system overall.

In this episode of Oncology Peer Review On-The-Go, CancerNetwork® spoke with 2 experts on the topic of biosimilars, Howard Hochster, MD, FACP, associate director for Clinical Research at the Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey as well as co-editor in chief of the journal ONCOLOGY®, and Distinguished Professor of Medicine at the Rutgers School of Medicine, and Michael Kane, RPh, BCOP, executive director of Oncology Pharmacy Services for RWJBarnabas Health and director of Pharmacy Services and the Research Pharmacy at the Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey.

The episode dives into the history of biosimilars, including the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) passed by the United States Congress in 2009 and the subsequent 4-letter suffix rule used to identify biologics products without confusion. The participants also analyzed some of the unintended consequences of these acts, and what they suggest for improving the current system.

Don’t forget to subscribe to the Oncology Peer Review On-The-Go podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or anywhere podcasts are available.

Recent Videos
According to Megan Mullins, PhD, MPH, challenging cultural norms surrounding death and dying may reduce the receipt of low-value end-of-life cancer care.
Earlier and more frequent talks about disabling ICDs with patients receiving end-of-life care and their families may help avoid excessive pain.
Large international meetings may facilitate conversations regarding disparities of care outside of high-income countries.
AI-powered tools may help alleviate doctor burnout and give clinicians more time to directly engage with patients.
Artificial intelligence may have the potential to enrich pathology practices to help identify aspects of tumor biology not seen with the human eye.
Efficacy results from the MASAI trial preceded the creation of the UK-funded EDITH trial, assessing 5 AI platforms in 700,000 women undergoing mammography.
In considering patients’ busy lives, AI may help reduce the number of visits required to fully stage and grade cancers.
Related Content