Ongoing Trials Suggest Benefits of Radium-223 Combos in Prostate Cancer

Video

Early data from ongoing clinical trials suggest the potential safety and efficacy of novel radium-223 combinations as treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Future research will look to affirm the overall survival (OS) and safety benefits of radium-223 in combination with agents including docetaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) studies such as the phase 3 DORA trial (NCT03574571), according to Scott T. Tagawa, MD, MS, FACP.

Tagawa, a professor of medicine and urology and medical director of the Genitourinary Oncology Research Program at Weill Cornell Medicine, spoke with CancerNetwork® at the 16th Annual Interdisciplinary Prostate Cancer Congress® and Other Genitourinary Malignancies regarding ongoing clinical trials investigating the efficacy of different radium-223 combination therapies in mCRPC.

Transcript:

There are a couple of ongoing phase 3 trials. One is a trial called PEACE III [NCT02194842], which is taking a patient population [with] untreated mCRPC—meaning frontline—with the backbone enzalutamide [Xtandi] with or without radium-223. This trial started with the benefit early on of knowing the phase 3 ERA 223 trial [NCT02043678] results. Early on, they mandated the use of bone health agents. We’ve seen a couple of initial safety presentations at [the American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting] that demonstrate that there’s no excess fractures to date, although we’re waiting for the overall efficacy results of that study.1

And then a separate combination study, based upon a PCC TC randomized phase 2 study [NCT01106352] led by [Michael J. Morris, MD], [is evaluating] docetaxel and radium-223. Again, [it] makes sense targeting different compartments and also [with the] radiosensitizing properties of the taxane. That randomized phase 2 trial showed improvements in efficacy with lower toxicity to the combination.2 Now, the combination is an adjusted dose and schedule, so docetaxel at 60 mg/m2 and radium-223 every 6 weeks to match with the docetaxel. In any case, that has led to the phase 3 DORA trial, which is ongoing [with] accrual, with probably more than a third still left to go. But what we’re hoping to see is an [OS] benefit, maybe with an improved safety profile.

References

  1. Tombal BF, Loriot Y, Saad F, et al. Decreased fracture rate by mandating bone-protecting agents in the EORTC 1333/PEACE III trial comparing enzalutamide and Ra223 versus enzalutamide alone: An interim safety analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:5007. doi:10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.5007
  2. Morris MJ, Loriot Y, Sweeney CJ, et al. Radium-223 in combination with docetaxel in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases: a phase 1 dose escalation/randomised phase 2a trial. Eur J Cancer. 2019;114:107-116. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2019.04.007
Recent Videos
Pancreatic cancer is projected to become the second-leading cause of cancer-related deaths by 2030 in the United States.
Educating community practices on CAR T referral and sequencing treatment strategies may help increase CAR T utilization.
The FirstLook liquid biopsy, when used as an adjunct to low-dose CT, may help to address the unmet need of low lung cancer screening utilization.
An 80% sensitivity for lung cancer was observed with the liquid biopsy, with high sensitivity observed for early-stage disease, as well.
Harmonizing protocols across the health care system may bolster the feasibility of giving bispecifics to those with lymphoma in a community setting.
Patients who face smoking stigma, perceive a lack of insurance, or have other low-dose CT related concerns may benefit from blood testing for lung cancer.
Establishment of an AYA Lymphoma Consortium has facilitated a process to better understand and address gaps in knowledge for this patient group.
Adult and pediatric oncology collaboration in assessing nivolumab in advanced Hodgkin lymphoma facilitated the phase 3 SWOG S1826 findings.
Treatment paradigms differ between adult and pediatric oncologists when treating young adults with lymphoma.
Differences in pancreatic cancer responses to treatment elicits a need to better educate patients on expectations in treatment, particularly chemotherapy.
Related Content