Patient Scenario 1: Diagnosis and Risk Stratification of Clear-Cell RCC

News
Video

Join Wenxin (Vincent) Xu, MD, and his team at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute as they explore strategies for diagnosing and stratifying renal cell carcinoma, reviewing a clinical scenarios and best practices in workup.

Summary:

In this clinical scenario, a 68-year-old woman, SK, presented with fatigue, right upper quadrant discomfort, and an 8-cm right renal mass diagnosed as clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Following a right total nephrectomy, she opted for active surveillance due to low disease volume. Two years later, a CT scan revealed bilateral pulmonary nodules, confirming advanced clear cell RCC through a biopsy. Despite normal blood work and a Karnofsky score of 90%, systemic therapy was initiated. The first-line approach involved cabozantinib and nivolumab, combining a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with an immunotherapy regimen.

The clinical presentation aligns with common symptoms seen at clinics like Dana-Farber, where patients often exhibit fatigue, pain, weight loss, or other systemic symptoms leading to a renal cell carcinoma diagnosis. Diagnosis and staging involve imaging, commonly starting with a CT scan, and may progress to a biopsy or nephrectomy based on findings. Staging incorporates the TNM system, assessing tumor size, lymph node involvement, and distant metastasis.

The discussion extended to the International mRCC (metastatic RCC) Database Consortium risk criteria, categorizing patients into favorable, unfavorable, or poor risk disease based on factors like performance status, time from diagnosis to systemic therapy, and laboratory results. This risk assessment aids in predicting survival and guides oncologists in selecting appropriate first-line systemic therapy. The initiation of systemic therapy, in this case, cabozantinib and nivolumab, is influenced by the patient’s risk group. Landmark trials categorized patients into risk groups, demonstrating varying benefits from treatments. Identifying the patient’s risk group becomes crucial for prognostication and tailoring effective first-line systemic therapy.

This scenario highlights the complexity of managing clear cell RCC, emphasizing the importance of risk assessment in predicting outcomes and guiding treatment decisions. The integration of targeted therapies and immunotherapies in first-line regimens reflects evolving strategies in managing advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Summary is AI-generated and reviewed by Cancer Network editorial staff.

Recent Videos
An “avalanche of funding” has propelled the kidney cancer field forward, says Jason Muhitch, PhD.
Kidney cancer advocacy efforts have spread the urgency and importance of funding research in the field to members of Congress.
Advocacy efforts have yielded a dramatic increase in kidney cancer research, according to Elizabeth P. Henske, MD.
A review of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma shows radiological tumor burden as an independent prognostic factor for survival.
A phase 2 trial is assessing ubamatamab in patients with MUC16-expressing SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma and epithelioid sarcoma.
Analysis of 2 phase 1 trials compared gut biome diversity between standard of care with or without CBM588 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Although no responses were observed in 11 patients receiving abemaciclib monotherapy, combination therapies with abemaciclib may offer clinical benefit.
Findings show no difference in overall survival between various treatments for metastatic RCC previously managed with immunotherapy and TKIs.
An epigenomic profiling approach may help pick up the entire tumor burden, thereby assisting with detecting sarcomatoid features in those with RCC.
Related Content