The FDA has pushed back PDUFA dates for sotorasib and obeticholic acid for metastatic CRC and primary biliary cholangitis indications.
Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) dates have been pushed back from the original target action dates set by the FDA for sotorasib (Lumakras) and obeticholic acid (Ocaliva) for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and primary biliary cholangitis, respectively.1
In May 2021, the FDA granted accelerated approval to sotorasib for the treatment of patients with KRAS G12C mutated non–small cell lung cancer.2 However, in December 2023, a complete response letter was given based on the supplemental new drug application (sNDA) in which full approval of sotorasib was sought.3
In May 2016, accelerated approval was given to obeticholic acid plus ursodeoxycholic acid for patients with primary biliary cholangitis.4 An sNDA was submitted for full approval of obeticholic acid in this indication.
For both indications, no new target action date has been set.
“We will continue to engage with the FDA regarding our pending application. We are grateful for the continuous and ongoing support of the [primary biliary cholangitis] community,” Vivek Devaraj, US president and chairman at Intercept, said in a press release on the regulatory update for obeticholic acid.
The phase 3 CodeBreaK 300 trial (NCT05198934) assessed sotorasib plus panitumumab (Vectibix) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.5 Patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive daily sotorasib at 960 mg plus panitumumab at 6 mg/kg every 2 weeks; 240 mg of daily sotorasib plus 6 mg/kg of panitumumab every 2 weeks; or investigators choice of trifluridine/tipiracil (Lonsurf) or regorafenib (Stivarga).
The median overall survival (OS) was not estimable (NE; 95% CI, 8.6-NE) in the 960 mg sotorasib arm (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.41-1.18; P = .20); 11.9 months (95% CI, 7.5-NE) in the 240 mg sotorasib arm (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.49-1.39; P = .50); and 10.3 months (95% CI, 7.0-NE) in the investigator’s choice arm.
Investigators noted that after a median follow-up of 13.6 months, the 960 mg and 240 mg arms showed a trend toward improved OS. Additionally, in the 960 mg arm, there was a 30% reduction in the risk of death.
In the 960 mg sotorasib arm, the objective response rate (ORR) was 30% (95% CI, 18.3%-44.3%), the duration of response (DOR) was 10.1 months, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR) was 5.8 months (95% CI, 4.2-7.5; HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.29-0.72).
In the 240 mg sotorasib arm, the ORR was 8% (95% CI, 2.1%-18.2%), the DOR was not reached, and the median PFS by BICR was 4.0 months (95% CI, 3.7-5.9; HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.37-0.88).
For the investigator’s choice arm, the ORR was 2% (95% CI, 0%-9.9%), the DOR was not reached (95% CI, 5.2-5.2), and the median PFS was 2.0 months (95% CI, 1.9-3.9).
Currently, obeticholic acid is indicated for use in patients with primary biliary cholangitis without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis who do not have evidence of portal hypertension.6 Obeticholic acid can be used in combination with ursodeoxycholic acid for patients who have an inadequate response to ursodeoxycholic acid monotherapy.
Important safety information includes having hepatic decompensation and failure that could result in liver transplant; obeticholic acid is contraindicated in patients who have decompensated cirrhosis a prior decompensation event or have portal hypertension. Patients should permanently discontinue obeticholic acid if they develop a laboratory abnormality or have clinical evidence of portal hypertension.
Severe pruritus was observed in 23% of patients who received obeticholic acid at 10 mg, and 19% of patients experienced severe pruritus in the obeticholic acid titration arm compared with 7% in the placebo arm across a 12-month randomized trial of 216 patients.