Pembrolizumab Is Effective in Unresectable Melanoma, at 4-Year Follow-Up

Article

After 4 years of follow-up, pembrolizumab demonstrated durable antitumor activity and improved outcomes over ipilimumab in advanced melanoma.

After 4 years of follow-up, pembrolizumab demonstrated durable antitumor activity and improved outcomes over ipilimumab in advanced melanoma, according to results from the KEYNOTE-006 trial. The results (abstract 9503) were presented at the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, held June 1–5 in Chicago.

“The role of pembrolizumab in advanced melanoma is very well established. It has significantly improved the overall survival and the progression-free survival compared with ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma,” said Georgina V. Long, MD, PhD, of the University of Sydney in Australia.

The KEYNOTE-006 trial included 834 patients with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma. They were randomized to receive one of two schedules of pembrolizumab (556 patients in total), or to ipilimumab (278 patients). The median age was 62 years in both groups, and approximately 35% of the patients had received one prior therapy before entering the trial. About 80% of the cohort was programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)–positive.

After a median follow-up of 45.9 months, the median overall survival was 32.7 months with pembrolizumab, and 15.9 months with ipilimumab, for a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.61–0.89). Only among patients who were treatment-naive, the median overall survival was 38.7 months and 17.1 months, respectively, for an HR of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.57–0.93).

Progression-free survival was also better with pembrolizumab, with a median of 8.3 months compared with 3.3 months with ipilimumab, for an HR of 0.56 (95% CI, 0.47–0.67). Again, this was similar in treatment-naive patients, with an HR of 0.54 (95% CI, 0.43–0.67).

The overall response rate was 42% with pembrolizumab and 17% with ipilimumab; there were 76 complete responses with pembrolizumab (14%), and 9 with ipilimumab (3%). The overall response rates in treatment-naive patients were similar, at 47% and 17%, respectively.

“With 4 years of follow-up, pembrolizumab continues to provide durable antitumor activity in both treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients with advanced melanoma,” Long said, adding that “retreatment with pembrolizumab upon disease progression can provide additional antitumor activity.”

Douglas B. Johnson, MD, of the Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center in Nashville, was the discussant for the session, and he highlighted that the progression-free survival even after stopping therapy was still very high. “It would be very nice to be able to predict which patients don’t maintain durable responses,” he said, and added that there is some indication that using PET scans as a marker can be effective. “Two years or less is a reasonable treatment duration” with pembrolizumab, he said.

Recent Videos
Advocacy groups such as Cancer Support Community and the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society may help support patients with CML undergoing treatment.
Paolo Tarantino, MD, discusses the potential utility of agents such as datopotamab deruxtecan and enfortumab vedotin in patients with breast cancer.
Paolo Tarantino, MD, highlights strategies related to screening and multidisciplinary collaboration for managing ILD in patients who receive T-DXd.
Those with CML should discuss adverse effects such as nausea or fatigue with their providers to help optimize their quality of life during treatment.
Patients with CML can become an active part of their treatment plan by discussing any questions that come to mind with their providers.
Jorge E. Cortes, MD, emphasizes proper communication between patients with chronic myeloid leukemia and their providers during the treatment course.
Dietary interventions or other medications may help mitigate diarrhea in patients who undergo therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia.
Considering notable adverse effects associated with treatment may be critical when selecting therapy options for those with CML.
Byoung Chul Cho, MD, PhD, highlights ongoing trials assessing intravenous and subcutaneous amivantamab in EGFR-mutant non–small cell lung cancer.
An AI-based system may reduce the time needed to match patients with cancer to suitable clinical trials.
Related Content