Pemetrexed/Gemcitabine Promising in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 11 No 9
Volume 11
Issue 9

ORLANDO-The combination of pemetrexed (Alimta) and gemcitabine (Gemzar) is active in pancreatic cancer with acceptable toxicity and a promising 32% 1-year survival rate, according to an oral presentation at the 38th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (abstract 499).

ORLANDO—The combination of pemetrexed (Alimta) and gemcitabine (Gemzar) is active in pancreatic cancer with acceptable toxicity and a promising 32% 1-year survival rate, according to an oral presentation at the 38th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (abstract 499).

Pemetrexed is a multitargeted anti-folate shown to have activity against pancreatic cancer in phase I and II trials. The combination of pemetrexed with gem-citabine is synergistic in vitro and was broadly active in a phase I study.

In this multicenter phase II trial, previously untreated patients with histologically proven advanced pancreatic cancer received gemcitabine, 1,250 mg/m2 over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle; pemetrexed, 500 mg/m2 over 10 minutes on day 8; and dexamethasone premedication to prevent rash.

Of 42 patients enrolled from September 1999 through November 2000, 41 were evaluable for response after receiving a total of 213 cycles (range, 1 to 20 per patient; median, 4). Median age was 60 years (range, 34 to 79); 64% of patients were male; 95% had stage IV disease; 12% had received prior fluorouracil. Most patients had a Karnofsky performance status of 80 or 90, and 67% had liver metastases.

"Beginning in December of 1999, folic acid and vitamin B12 were also given during a 2- to 7-day lead-in period, since earlier studies showed that these supplements significantly reduce pemetrexed toxicity," said presenter and lead author Hedy L. Kindler, MD, assistant professor of medicine, University of Chicago.

Patients underwent a daily pain assessment and kept an analgesic medication diary; they were seen weekly for history, physical, weight, and performance status, and every 6 weeks they had a CT scan and a CA19-9 test. There were six partial responses for an overall response rate of 12%, and 44% of patients had stable disease. Three additional patients had an unconfirmed partial response. One-year survival was 32%. Median survival was 6.6 months, and median time to progression was 3.1 months.

Clinical benefit analysis was done on 30 patients, and 4 patients (13.3%) achieved a clinical benefit response (a composite of performance status, analgesic consumption, pain intensity, and weight). "It is noteworthy that the patients in this study were less symptomatic at baseline, compared to those in a randomized gemcitabine study, which is why we may have seen a lower clinical benefit response," Dr. Kindler said.

Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia in 84% of patients, leukopenia in 74%, thrombocytopenia in 33%, anemia in 14%, and neutropenic fever in 12%. Other grade 3-4 toxicities were fatigue in 4% and diarrhea in 2%.

"In general, it appeared to me that this regimen was a step forward over single-agent gemcitabine," coinvestigator Howard Hochster, MD, an oncologist at New York University, told ONI. "The regimen was tolerated well with few additional toxicities, except for some increased fatigue, compared to my experience with gemcitabine as a single agent. Two of my patients responded, including one for more than 6 months with very good quality of life."

An ongoing international randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed/gemcitabine vs gemcitabine alone is currently enrolling patients with a goal of 520. "This study should determine whether the addition of pemetrexed improves survival, response, and quality of life in pancreatic cancer patients," Dr. Kindler said. ONI

 

Recent Videos
Differences in pancreatic cancer responses to treatment elicits a need to better educate patients on expectations in treatment, particularly chemotherapy.
Increasing patient awareness of modifiable risk factors for pancreatic cancer may help mitigate incidence of pancreatic cancers.
It may be crucial to test every patient for markers such as BRAF V600E mutations, NRG1 fusions, and KRAS G12C mutations to help manage pancreatic cancers.
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD, emphasizes the idea of moving targeted therapies to earlier lines of treatment to further improve outcomes in pancreatic cancer.
As patients are nearing the end of life, different management strategies, such as opioids, may be needed to help mitigate pain or fatigue.
Kelley A. Rone, DNP, RN, AGNP-c, highlights the importance of having end-of-life discussions early in a patient’s cancer treatment course.
Experts from Vanderbilt University Medical Center emphasize gathering a second opinion to determine if a tumor is resectable in patients with pancreatic cancer.
Experts from Vanderbilt University Medical Center discuss the use of intraoperative radiation therapy in a 64-year-old patient with pancreatic cancer.
Investigators are assessing the use of IORT in patients with borderline resectable or unresectable pancreatic cancer as part of the phase 2 PACER trial.
Kamran Idrees, MD, MSCI, MMHC, FACS, discusses how factors such as vessel involvement can influence the decision to proceed with surgical therapy.
Related Content