Spending More for Lung Cancer Treatment Did Not Substantially Increase Patients' Lives

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 21 No 12
Volume 21
Issue 12

Spending More for Lung Cancer Treatment Did Not Substantially Increase Patients' Lives

A new study finds that survival for elderly patients with lung cancer has changed little despite large increases in health-care expenditures for lung cancer treatment. The study by Harvard University, National Cancer Institute, and National Bureau of Economic Research researchers, to be published in the December 1, 2007, issue of Cancer, finds that average life expectancy rose by less than 1 month between 1983 and 1997, while costs rose by over $20,000 per patient.

Stable 5-Year Survival Rate

Lung cancer remains the top cause of cancer death in the United States, with an estimated 160,390 deaths expected to occur in 2007. The US spends more than $5

Recent Videos
The FirstLook liquid biopsy, when used as an adjunct to low-dose CT, may help to address the unmet need of low lung cancer screening utilization.
An 80% sensitivity for lung cancer was observed with the liquid biopsy, with high sensitivity observed for early-stage disease, as well.
Patients who face smoking stigma, perceive a lack of insurance, or have other low-dose CT related concerns may benefit from blood testing for lung cancer.
Video 4 - "Frontline Treatment for EGFR-Mutated Lung Cancer"
Video 3 - "NGS Testing Challenges and Considerations in NSCLC"
Related Content