Superiority of Asciminib in CML-CP Is a ‘Win-Win’ for Patients

News
Video

Talha Badar, MBBS, MD, discussed the unmet needs in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase.

As part of CancerNetwork’s Face-Off video series, Talha Badar, MBBS, MD, assistant professor of oncology, Mayo Clinic, discussed unmet needs in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP), and how results from the phase 3 ASCEMBL study (NCT03106779) are addressing these gaps.

In the trial, investigators assessed asciminib (Scemblix) at 40 mg twice daily vs bosutinib (Bosulif) at 500 mg once daily in patients with CP-CML who had been treated with 2 or more TKIs. A total of 223 patients were randomized 2:1 to active or control therapy with a median follow-up of 14.9 months. At baseline, MCyR was observed in 29.3% of patients in the asciminib arm vs 28.9% in the bosutinib arm. After the data analysis cutoff date, treatment was ongoing in 61.8% vs 28.9% of patients, respectively, with 37.6% and 71.1% discontinuing therapy.

The 24-week MMR rate was 25.5% in the asciminib arm and 13.2% in the bosutinib arm, equating to a 12.2% difference between groups after adjusting for baseline MCyR rates (95% CI, 2.19%-22.30%; 2-sided P = .029). The cumulative incidence of MMR at week 24 was 25.0% in the asciminib arm vs 12.0% in the bosutinib arm.

Badar: The 2 ways of thinking of it, and 1 unmet need is when the disease evolved with time. With prior lines of therapy, the patient tends to develop resistance mechanism, resistant mutation, in which T315I has been the most threatening in terms of patients’ prognosis and outcome. And for those patients, we have only 2 approved oral therapies: asciminib and ponatinib [Iclusig].

There's another medication which is an IV form, which is methadone that has been used prior to advent of ponatinib. In those settings, asciminib maintains a superiority in achieving response in those group of patients who are failing prior ponatinib therapy. So the one unmet need is the patients who had multiple prior therapies, including TC15 and having TC15i mutation, how to counter that mutation how to improve outcome.

The other major unmet need is the tolerance to therapies. There are a subset of patients who don’t tolerate TKI-based therapies and, as we know, from our clinical experience asciminib tends to have a better tolerance and less side effects compared to other TKIs, which had been established and reused in clinic every day.

So if you get a therapy, which is equally or better in efficacy, and as well tolerated, that's a win-win situation.

Transcription edited for clarity.

Recent Videos
Both clinicians and patients should have as much information as possible to participate in shared decision-making for CLL care, says Jacob D. Soumerai, MD.
Next-generation clinical trials may address when to use CDK4/6 inhibition in patients with low-grade serous ovarian cancer.
Sequencing different treatments in the first 3 lines of therapy represents a challenge in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, according to Deborah Stephens, DO.
The NRG-GY019 trial will assess chemotherapy plus letrozole vs letrozole alone as a frontline treatment for patients with low-grade serous ovarian cancer.
Nearly 40% of low-grade serous ovarian cancers have RAS alterations, which are predominately KRAS mutations.
Other ongoing urothelial cancer trials are assessing enfortumab vedotin–based combinations in the neoadjuvant setting.
Given resource scarcity, developing practice strategies for resource-constrained settings would require aid from commercial and government stakeholders.
Approximately 95% of those with a complete response to enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab were alive after 2 years in the phase 3 EV-302 trial.