Using Cannabis as a Palliative Treatment in Patients With Cancer

Podcast

Ahead of the ASCO Annual Meeting, we discuss the use of cannabis as a palliative treatment in patients with cancer with Claude Cyr, MD.

Claude Cyr, MD

Ahead of the 2019 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, we are speaking with Claude Cyr, MD, of McGill University in Montreal, about the emerging roles for cannabis in cancer symptom management. Dr. Cyr will be speaking at an Education Session titled, “Cannabis for Symptom Management,” on Sunday, June 2, at the meeting, which is being held May 31–June 4 in Chicago.

-Interviewed by Bryant Furlow

Cancer Network:How is the need for palliative treatment options for patients with cancer changing, and what potential roles do you see for cannabis in this setting?

Dr. Cyr: Palliative patients often have multiple symptoms, ranging from physical, like pain and nausea, to psychological, like anxiety and depression, and even existential or spiritual. While we’re always looking for new ways to better manage these symptoms, cannabis is one of those few compounds that addresses many of the most distressing symptoms encountered in palliative care, like pain, nausea control, insomnia, anxiety, depression, and even fatigue. It also has an enviable safety profile.

Cancer Network:When is it appropriate to consider cannabis for a patient who needs cancer palliation? For which symptoms is cannabis most often used?

Dr. Cyr: Palliative patients must ultimately decide if, and when, they wish to try cannabis, but physicians should be knowledgeable of all the effects of cannabis and not just those related to pain control or nausea, which was the focus of many of the earlier studies. Physicians must be willing to offer this treatment option on an as-needed basis. I believe cannabis should be considered at any point for patients with a terminal illness.

Cancer Network: Are there any patients for whom cannabis should not be considered?

Dr. Cyr: Cannabis has a relatively good safety profile as long as the dosage issues are taken into consideration. Unfortunately, THC can be a little tricky in some individuals at small doses. It is generally safe, but patients with a history of psychosis, for example, can be at risk of aggravating their conditions. Also, high initial doses of THC can induce temporary psychotic symptoms in many individuals who don’t have this predisposition. It can also cause hypertension and syncope, but this can almost always be avoided with a careful titration. CBD, on the other hand, which is also one of the main cannabinoids in cannabis, is usually well tolerated at even high doses in all types of individuals. There is another group in whom it must be avoided. Patients who use immunotherapy like PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors should avoid using cannabis until further notice, since a study last year demonstrated that cannabis can reduce the efficacy of these types of treatments.

Cancer Network: How strong is the evidence base for cannabis’s efficacy for treating cancer symptoms and treatment symptoms?

Dr. Cyr: Unfortunately not that good at the moment. There are only a few randomized studies that have been done for pain and appetite, and certainly not enough to meet the requirements of present-day evidence-based standards.

Cancer Network:Let me follow up on that point. What are the implications there for how clinicians should address this issue then? Should physicians wait for a patient to raise the issue of using cannabis for palliation, or is it okay for clinicians to raise the issue, given that it’s not yet been approved by regulatory bodies?

Dr. Cyr: Considering the fact that cannabis can address so many different symptoms related to palliative care, I think patients who present certain symptoms that are not controlled by traditional therapy should be offered cannabis at any point to see whether, first, the cannabis is well tolerated, and second, if it does treat the condition at hand.

Cancer Network:Should cannabis be prescribed only as an adjuvant to other supportive therapies?

Dr. Cyr: When it comes to palliative care, I think suffering must be addressed with every tool we have at our disposition. Also, patient preference must also be taken into consideration.

Cancer Network: What else would you like to tell our readers about cannabis and cancer symptoms?

Dr. Cyr: My main focus would be not to forget that cannabis is a multifaceted tool. It needs to be regarded not only as an adjunct or an alternative to a specific symptom control, but in a general approach to quality of life.

Cancer Network: Thank you very much. We appreciate your time.

Dr. Cyr: Thank you so much!

Recent Videos
Harmonizing protocols across the health care system may bolster the feasibility of giving bispecifics to those with lymphoma in a community setting.
Although accuracy remains a focus in whole-body MRI testing in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, comfortable testing experiences may ease anxiety.
Subsequent testing among patients in a prospective study may affirm the ability of cfDNA sequencing to detect cancers in those with Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
cfDNA sequencing may allow for more accessible, frequent, and sensitive testing compared with standard surveillance in Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
STX-478 showed efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors regardless of whether they had kinase domain or helical PI3K mutations.
STX-478 may avoid adverse effects associated with prior PI3K inhibitors that lack selectivity for the mutated protein vs the wild-type protein.
Phase 1 data may show the possibility of rationally designing agents that can preferentially target PI3K mutations in solid tumors.
Funding a clinical trial to further assess liquid biopsy in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome may help with detecting cancers early across the board.
Michael J. Hall, MD, MS, FASCO, discusses the need to reduce barriers to care for those with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, including those who live in rural areas.
Related Content