Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide: A Highly Active and Well-Tolerated Regimen for Patients With Previously Untreated Indolent Lymphomas

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 13 No 3
Volume 13
Issue 3

Fludarabine (Fludara) and cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan, Neosar) are two highly active agents in the treatment of indolent

Fludarabine (Fludara) and cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan, Neosar) are two highly active agents in the treatment of indolent lymphomas. In vitro, these agents are synergistic. Preliminary reports of clinical trials indicate increased complete response rates over the single agents. However, concern remains about the toxic effects of the agents when used in combination, especially the incidence of opportunistic infections, and also about the best dose and schedule.

We have completed accrual to a phase II trial of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in patients with previously untreated indolent lymphoproliferative disorders. Eligibility includes age ³ 18 years, low-grade and select intermediate-grade lymphoproliferative disorders, symptomatic disease, and good organ function.

Patients received cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m² IVon day 1) and fludarabine (20 mg/m² IV on days 1-5). Chemotherapy was repeated every 28 days. Bone marrow transplant (BMT) candidates received only four cycles. Other patients received a maximum of six cycles. Patients received Pneumocystis carinii (PCP) prophylaxis and support withgranulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim [Neupogen]).

A total of 39 patients were entered into the study (28 male/11 female; median age, 53 years [range 30-73 years]). Thirty-eight patients are evaluable for response

.One patient died of unknown cause shortly after receiving the second cycle of chemotherapy. One patient was diagnosed with cryptococcal pneumonia during the second cycle of chemotherapy. One patient developed focal seizures 30 days after the fourth cycle of chemotherapy that have not recurred and are of uncertain etiology. One patient developed grade 4 pulmonary toxicity. Hematopoietic toxicity was mild. Nausea, vomiting, and alopecia were minimal.

CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that this is a highly active and well-tolerated regimen. Careful attention must be given to prophylaxis against opportunistic infections.

 Click here for Dr. Bruce Cheson’s commentary on this abstract.

Articles in this issue

WHO Declares Lymphatic Mapping to Be the Standard of Care for Melanoma
Rituximab: Phase II Retreatment Study in Patients With Low-Grade or Follicular Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
Response Criteria for NHL: Importance of “Normal” Lymph Node Size and Correlations With Response
Chemotherapy Plus Radiation Improves Survival in Patients With Cervical Cancer
A Randomized Trial of Fludarabine, Mitoxantrone (FM) Versus Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide, Vindesine, Prednisone (CHEP) as First Line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Low-Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Multicenter Study by GOELAMS Group
Navelbine Increased Elderly Lung Cancer Patients’ Survival
Fludarabine Versus Conventional CVP Chemotherapy in Newly C Diagnosed Patients With Stages III and IV Low-Grade Malignant Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: Preliminary Results From a Prospective, Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial in 381 Patients
Multicenter, Phase III Study of Iodine-131 Tositumomab (Anti-B1 Antibody) for Chemotherapy-Refractory Low-Grade or Transformed Low-Grade Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
T-Cell–Depleted Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplant From HLA-Matched Sibling Donors for Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
Consensus Statement on Prevention and Early Diagnosis of Lung Cancer
In Vivo Purging and Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Rituximab During PBSC Transplant For NHL
Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide: A Highly Active and Well-Tolerated Regimen for Patients With Previously Untreated Indolent Lymphomas
Campath-1H Monoclonal Antibody in Therapy for Advanced Low-Grade Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphomas: A Phase II Study
AIDS Drugs Effective Against Most Common HIV Strain
Rituximab Therapy in Previously Treated Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia: Preliminary Evidence of Activity
Recent Videos
An “avalanche of funding” has propelled the kidney cancer field forward, says Jason Muhitch, PhD.
4 experts are featured in this series.
4 experts are featured in this series.
3 experts in this video
3 experts in this video
Related Content