Laparoscopy Yields Increased Surgical Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer

Commentary
Video

Laparoscopy may reduce the degree of pain or length of hospital stay compared with open surgery for patients with colorectal cancer.

Surgical treatment with laparoscopy or robotic tools has become the standard of care for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), according to Gregory Charak, MD.

In a conversation with CancerNetwork®, Charak, a board-certified colorectal surgeon at Palisades Medical Center and Hackensack University Medical Center of Hackensack Meridian Health, highlighted laparoscopy as a key advancement in the surgical management of CRC, which has produced improvements related to hospital stay durations and pain for patients compared with other techniques. He also discussed factors he considered for selecting the use of laparoscopy over standard open surgery.

In most cases, laparoscopic or robotic surgery are the preferred modalities that Charak offers, as they appear to confer the best surgical outcomes while minimizing trauma for patients. However, he said he may still consider the use of open surgery depending on factors such as the size of the patient’s tumor.

Transcript:

Probably in the last 20 years, the biggest advance surgically has been moving to minimally invasive techniques. Laparoscopy and robotics have become more or less the standard of care with our approach to cancer surgery whenever possible. That makes for better outcomes for our patients.

Long story short, whenever possible, we attempt to do laparoscopic surgery or robotic surgery—the 2 are interchangeable—to get the best outcome for our patients with the least trauma. At the end of the day, what you’re doing to the tissues inside the body is the same. To a certain extent, the invasiveness is the same. The degree of pain and the length of hospital stay can be improved with minimally invasive techniques. If open surgery is required to cure cancer, for example, because of the size of the tumor or other factors, we don’t hesitate to do surgery that way either. We do whatever is best for the patient in that situation.

Recent Videos
An 80% sensitivity for lung cancer was observed with the liquid biopsy, with high sensitivity observed for early-stage disease, as well.
Harmonizing protocols across the health care system may bolster the feasibility of giving bispecifics to those with lymphoma in a community setting.
Patients who face smoking stigma, perceive a lack of insurance, or have other low-dose CT related concerns may benefit from blood testing for lung cancer.
Establishment of an AYA Lymphoma Consortium has facilitated a process to better understand and address gaps in knowledge for this patient group.
Adult and pediatric oncology collaboration in assessing nivolumab in advanced Hodgkin lymphoma facilitated the phase 3 SWOG S1826 findings.
Treatment paradigms differ between adult and pediatric oncologists when treating young adults with lymphoma.
Differences in pancreatic cancer responses to treatment elicits a need to better educate patients on expectations in treatment, particularly chemotherapy.
Increasing patient awareness of modifiable risk factors for pancreatic cancer may help mitigate incidence of pancreatic cancers.
It may be crucial to test every patient for markers such as BRAF V600E mutations, NRG1 fusions, and KRAS G12C mutations to help manage pancreatic cancers.
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD, emphasizes the idea of moving targeted therapies to earlier lines of treatment to further improve outcomes in pancreatic cancer.
Related Content