Neoadjuvant Treatment Has Potential in Select CRC Populations

Commentary
Video

Administering neoadjuvant therapy to patients with colorectal cancer may help surgical oncologists attain a negative-margin resection.

When administered in the right setting, neoadjuvant therapy can be a “fantastic” treatment option for those with colorectal cancer (CRC), according to Gregory Charak, MD.

In an interview with CancerNetwork® at John Theurer Cancer Center, Charak, a board-certified colorectal surgeon at Palisades Medical Center and Hackensack University Medical Center of Hackensack Meridian Health, spoke about how the development of neoadjuvant treatments such as immunotherapy has influenced the role of the surgical oncologist in the CRC field.

According to Charak, managing a large, borderline resectable tumor with neoadjuvant therapy may help surgeons achieve resections with negative margins, thereby yielding less morbidity for patients. Additionally, he highlighted that it may be possible for neoadjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy or immunotherapy to result in tumor shrinkage.

According to previously published findings in Frontiers in Immunology, neoadjuvant treatment has demonstrated the potential to downsize CRC tumors preoperatively while improving local and systemic control of the disease, although authors noted no significant overall survival benefits across previous clinical trials. For instance, authors reported favorable outcomes with frontline pembrolizumab (Keytruda) in those with metastatic CRC that is mismatch repair deficient. Overall, the authors stated that greater cooperation between tumor immunologists and clinicians may advance how those in the field understand the mechanisms of action of immune checkpoint inhibitors in this population.

Transcript:

Neoadjuvant therapy is fantastic in the right setting and with the right patients. For surgeons, if you have a medical way to take a big, invasive, borderline resectable tumor and make it more manageable while giving us a better chance of getting a negative-margin resection, then that’s fantastic with less morbidity to the patient. Moreover, if you can get a tumor to disappear with neoadjuvant therapy, which sometimes happens both with cytotoxic chemotherapy and with immunotherapy, what a joy [that is]. We don’t mind being put out of business when it helps our patients, in particular our [patients with] cancer.

Reference

Zhu J, Lian J, Xu B, et al. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for colorectal cancer: right regimens, right patients, right directions? Front Immunol. 2013:14. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023

Recent Videos
Both clinicians and patients should have as much information as possible to participate in shared decision-making for CLL care, says Jacob D. Soumerai, MD.
Next-generation clinical trials may address when to use CDK4/6 inhibition in patients with low-grade serous ovarian cancer.
Sequencing different treatments in the first 3 lines of therapy represents a challenge in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, according to Deborah Stephens, DO.
The NRG-GY019 trial will assess chemotherapy plus letrozole vs letrozole alone as a frontline treatment for patients with low-grade serous ovarian cancer.
Nearly 40% of low-grade serous ovarian cancers have RAS alterations, which are predominately KRAS mutations.
Other ongoing urothelial cancer trials are assessing enfortumab vedotin–based combinations in the neoadjuvant setting.
Given resource scarcity, developing practice strategies for resource-constrained settings would require aid from commercial and government stakeholders.
Approximately 95% of those with a complete response to enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab were alive after 2 years in the phase 3 EV-302 trial.
Related Content