Orphan Drug Designation Granted to 225Ac-SSO110 for SCLC

Fact checked by Ariana Pelosci
News
Article

Following promising results from a trial investigating the effects of 225Ac-SSO110 on Balb/c nude mice injected with the xenograft model of SCLC, IND clearance was granted by the FDA.

Following promising results from a trial investigating the effects of 225Ac-SSO110 on Balb/c nude mice injected with the xenograft model of SCLC, IND clearance was granted by the FDA.

Following promising results from a trial investigating the effects of 225Ac-SSO110 on Balb/c nude mice injected with the xenograft model of SCLC, IND clearance was granted by the FDA.

225Ac-SSO110 (satoreotide), a first-in-class actinium-labelled somatostatin receptor 2 antagonist, was granted orphan drug designation from the FDA for the treatment of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC), according to a press release from the developer, Ariceum Therapeutics.1

The developer plans to begin phase 1/2 human clinical development of satoreotide in the SANTANA-225 trial in the first quarter of 2025 that will investigate the agent in patients with SCLC or Merkel cell carcinoma.2

Preclinical results presented at the 2024 European Association of Nuclear Medicine Annual Conference in Hamburg, Germany demonstrated the significant potential of satoreotide.3 The aim of the study was to identify the optimal isotope for SSO110; options included 225Ac, 212Pb, 161Pb, and 177Lu. Anti-tumor efficacy data of 177Lu-SSO110 and 225Ac-SSO110 to 225Ac-DOTA-Tate

“Receiving orphan drug designation for 225Ac-satoreotide is a recognition of its potential as a treatment option for patients with SCLC and an important regulatory milestone for Ariceum,” Manfred Rüdiger, chief executive officer at Ariceum Therapeutics, wrote in the press release.1 “The FDA’s orphan drug designation will support our objective to accelerate the development of 225Ac-satoreotide through human trials to provide a potentially life-saving therapy to patients with limited alternatives.”

225Ac and 212Pb-labeled satoreotide elicited a tumor uptake of 10.3% ID/g and 4.7% ID/g, respectively, at 4 hours. The regions with the highest levels of normal tissue uptake were kidneys (13.9% ID/g vs 10.5% ID/g, respectively), pancreas (1.2% ID/g vs 0.9% ID/g, respectively), and stomach (1.3% ID/g vs 0.6% ID/g, respectively).

From 4 hours to 96 hours, 225Ac-sanreotide’s tumor-to-kidney ratios increased from .75 to 1.4, demonstrating clearance from the kidney while being retained in the tumor.

Tumor growth inhibition was observed in all treatment groups aside from the 3.3 kBq 225Ac-sanreotide group; 30 kBq 225Ac-sanreotide and 20 MBq 177Lu-sanreotide given in single-dose demonstrated superior tumor volume reductions compared with 30 kBq 225Ac-DOTA-TATE; and injection of only 225Ac-sanreotide elicited durable complete responses and 100% survival of treated mice in the NCI-H69 model.

In the trial, balb/c nude nude mice were engrafted with the xenograft model for SCLC, SSTR2–positive NCI-H69 tumor cells, and mice were randomized based on tumor volume before the start of treatment.

The tumor bearing mice (n = 4) were then injected with 90 kBq/1 µg of satoreotide and assessed for biodistribution in harvested organs and tissues at 4, 24, and 96 hours using liquid scintillation counting. Escalating single-doses of 225Ac-SSO110 were compared with 225Ac-DOTA-TATE, 177Lu-SSO110, and vehicle; the average tumor volume at treatment initiation was 160 mm.3

Clinical signs and body weight changes were key end points monitored by investigators. Safety-relevant end points like organ weights and blood chemistry were also included at the end of the study.

225Ac-SSO110 showed high tumor uptake and its biodistribution profile is highly similar to 177LuSSO110 as expected. 225Ac-SSO110 was well tolerated,” lead study author Anika Jaekel, PhD, head of Translational Biology and Non-Clinical Pharmacology at Ariceum, and lead study author, wrote in the presentation.3 “These data warrant clinical investigation of 225Ac-SSO110 and a phase 1 clinical trial in patients with somatostatin receptor 2-positive is planned to start in Q1 of 2025.”

The developer hopes that “225Ac-SSO110 in tandem with 68Ga-SSO120, a companion patient selection tracer, will operate as a “theranostic pair”.1 The pair is intended to both diagnose and enact targeted radionuclide treatment of SSTR2-expressing, aggressive hard-to-treat cancers like SCLC and merkel cell carcinoma, among others.

Previously, the agent also received IND clearance from the FDA.

References

  1. U.S. FDA grants orphan drug designation to Ariceum Therapeutics’ proprietary radiopharmaceutical cancer therapy. News release. Ariceum. February 6, 2025. Accessed February 6, 2025. https://tinyurl.com/326mc4wt
  2. FDA clears Ariceum Therapeutics’ 225Ac-satoreotide phase I/II clinical study in patients with small cell lung cancer or merkel cell carcinoma. News release. Ariceum. January 14, 2025. Accessed February 6, 2025. https://tinyurl.com/vtkpvdwr
  3. Jaekel A, Desai P, Sturzbecher-Hoehne M, et al. [225Ac]Ac-SSO110 and [177Lu]Lu-SSO110 demonstrate significantly better efficacy than [225Ac]Ac-DOTA-TATE in the treatment of SSTR2-positive tumor xenografts. Presented at: 2024 European Association of Nuclear Medicine Annual Conference; October 19-23, 2024; Hamburg, Germany. Abstract 242038.
Recent Videos
James Ninia, MD, discussed a phase 2/3 trial seeking to answer whether complete consolidation offers more benefit than incomplete consolidation in SCLC.
Overall survival benefit was significant with complete vs incomplete consolidation therapy, but lost significance when stratified by disease burden.
James Ninia, MD, discussed treatment options for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer undergoing metastasis-directed radiotherapy.
Eric Singhi, MD, and the Oncology Brothers presenting slides
Eric Singhi, MD, and the Oncology Brothers presenting slides
Eric Singhi, MD, and the Oncology Brothers presenting slides
Eric Singhi, MD, and the Oncology Brothers presenting slides
Eric Singhi, MD, and the Oncology Brothers presenting slides
The use of novel agents like tarlatamab may be “interesting” among patients with small cell lung cancer in the relapsed setting, says Gregory Peter Kalemkerian, MD.
Prophylactic cranial irradiation may not be worthwhile for treating patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer based on conflicting data, according to Gregory Peter Kalemkerian, MD.
Related Content