(P031) Initial Experience With Combined BRAF and MEK Inhibition With Stereotactic Radiosurgery for BRAF-Mutant Melanoma Brain Metastases

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 30 No 4_Suppl_1
Volume 30
Issue 4_Suppl_1

In this initial experience of melanoma brain metastases treated with BRAF and MEK inhibition with stereotactic radiosurgery, we find that the two modalities can be combined safely. These outcomes should be assessed further in prospective evaluations.

Bindiya G. Patel, BS, Kamran A. Ahmed, MD, Peter A.S. Johnstone, MD, Hsiang-Hsuan Michael Yu, ScM, MD, Arnold B. Etame, MD, PhD; University of South Florida; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases occur in at least one in three patients with advanced melanoma. The management of melanoma brain metastases continues to present challenges. Approximately 40% to 60% of patients with melanoma have an activating mutation in the BRAF gene, a serine-threonine protein kinase that leads to cell cycle activation and cellular proliferation modulated by the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. Use of a BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) has shown improved extracranial and intracranial responses in the treatment of malignant melanoma. However, acquisition of therapeutic resistance remains a major limitation of BRAFi monotherapy in melanoma. The combined use of the BRAFi dabrafenib and the MEK inhibitor (MEKi) trametinib has been found to improve survival over use of dabrafenib alone. Synergies between targeted systemic therapies and radiation therapy offer potential for further investigation to improve intracranial response rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, we report our initial experience in the management of melanoma brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with the use of BRAFi and MEKi treatment. We identified six patients treated with SRS to 17 brain metastases within 3 months of BRAFi and MEKi administration. The median planning target volume was 0.42 cm3 (range: 0.02–1.29 cm3). The median treatment dose was 21 Gy (range: 18–24 Gy). The median follow-up of all lesions from SRS was 10.6 months (range: 5.8–28.5 mo).

RESULTS: One lesion was found to undergo local failure 21.7 months following SRS treatment. The median overall survival was 19.6 months (range: 6.1–31.8 mo) from the time of SRS treatment and 21.4 months (range: 12.1–30.9 mo) from the date of BRAFi and MEKi administration. There was no evidence of increased or unexpected toxicity with the two modalities combined.

CONCLUSIONS: In this initial experience of melanoma brain metastases treated with BRAF and MEK inhibition with SRS, we find that the two modalities can be combined safely. These outcomes should be assessed further in prospective evaluations.

Proceedings of the 98th Annual Meeting of the American Radium Society -americanradiumsociety.org

Articles in this issue

(S002) A 15-Year Review of Radiation Therapy for Keloids at Two Institutions
(S003) Single-Fraction Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma Bony Metastases Provides Pain Control and Decreases Time to Chemotherapy
(S001) Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Serum Inflammatory Markers in Patients Receiving Radiation Therapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer
(S004) Trend in Second Malignancy Risk for Head and Neck Cancer With Increased Utilization of IMRT: Analysis of SEER Database
(S005) Comparison of Legal Needs of a Group of Patients With Cancer: Economic and Geographic Factors
(S006) Mission Improvement: Lessons From Initiating a Resident-Led Quality Improvement Project on Smoking Cessation at a County Hospital
(S007) Results of a Phase II Trial Using Cetuximab Plus Docetaxel With Low-Dose Fractionated Radiation for Recurrent Unresectable Locally Advanced Head and Neck Carcinoma
(S008) The Effect of Simulation and Treatment Delays for Patients With Oropharyngeal Cancer Receiving Definitive Radiation Therapy in the Era of Risk Stratification Using Smoking and Human Papilloma Virus Status
(S009) Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Boost for Unfavorable Prostate Cancer: A Report on Three-Year Toxicity
(S011) Comparative Study Between Ileal Conduit and Indiana Pouch After Cystectomy for Patients With Carcinoma of Urinary Bladder
(S010) Computed Tomography–Assessed Measures of Bone Mineral Density and Muscle Mass as Predictors of Survival in Men With Prostate Cancer
(S012) Quantitative Imaging to Evaluate the Malignant Potential of Pancreatic Cysts
(S013) Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Concurrent Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
(S014) The Impact of Radiation Therapy on Survival in Surgically Resected, High-Risk Patients With Ampullary Adenocarcinoma: A Population-Based Analysis
(S016) The Impact of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy on Overall Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
Recent Videos
Harmonizing protocols across the health care system may bolster the feasibility of giving bispecifics to those with lymphoma in a community setting.
Although accuracy remains a focus in whole-body MRI testing in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, comfortable testing experiences may ease anxiety.
Subsequent testing among patients in a prospective study may affirm the ability of cfDNA sequencing to detect cancers in those with Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
cfDNA sequencing may allow for more accessible, frequent, and sensitive testing compared with standard surveillance in Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
STX-478 showed efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors regardless of whether they had kinase domain or helical PI3K mutations.
STX-478 may avoid adverse effects associated with prior PI3K inhibitors that lack selectivity for the mutated protein vs the wild-type protein.
Phase 1 data may show the possibility of rationally designing agents that can preferentially target PI3K mutations in solid tumors.
Funding a clinical trial to further assess liquid biopsy in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome may help with detecting cancers early across the board.
Michael J. Hall, MD, MS, FASCO, discusses the need to reduce barriers to care for those with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, including those who live in rural areas.
Related Content