(S007) Results of a Phase II Trial Using Cetuximab Plus Docetaxel With Low-Dose Fractionated Radiation for Recurrent Unresectable Locally Advanced Head and Neck Carcinoma

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 30 No 4_Suppl_1
Volume 30
Issue 4_Suppl_1

From our institutional experience, low-dose RT in addition to docetaxel and cetuximab is well tolerated. More durable treatment options may exist for definitive treatment; however, this protocol may offer low-morbidity palliation in select patients.

Vivek Patel, MD, Deukwoo Kwon, PhD, Michael Samuels, MD, Nagy Elsayyad, MD, Laura Freedman, MD, Donald Weed, MD, Elizabeth Franzmann, MD, Emeka Ikpeazu, MD, PhD, Gustavo Fernandez, MD; University of Miami

PURPOSE: After curative treatment, local failure remains a problem in advanced head and neck cancer. Chemotherapy, generally considered the standard salvage treatment, produces less than a 50% response rate. Surgical salvage is not always feasible, due to disease location. Radiation therapy (RT) in combination with chemotherapy was evaluated in various studies, including RTOG 96-11 and 99-11, with an improved treatment response at the cost of morbidity. Our study evaluates whether low-dose RT in addition to docetaxel and cetuximab improves the response rate of patients with recurrent, unresectable, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck while avoiding the significant morbidity/risk of re-irradiation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between October 2013 and February 2015, seven patients signed consent, with five treated in this phase II study. All patients received cetuximab at 400 mg/m2 as a loading dose 1 week prior to RT and then at 250 mg/m2 weekly. Docetaxel was given at 20 mg/m2 once a week on day 1 of weeks 2 and 7. RT consisted of 0.5 Gy/fx BID at least 6 hours apart on days 2 and 3 of weeks 2 to 7, for a total dose of 12 Gy.

RESULTS: The median prior RT dose was 70 Gy. All patients completed protocol treatment. At the 1-month follow-up, partial response was seen in three patients (60%), stable disease was seen in one patient (20%), and progressive disease was seen in one (20%) patient. By 6 months, four patients (80%) underwent full re-irradiation as salvage treatment at progression. All patients had grade 1 skin rash, attributed to chemotherapy. There was one patient with grade 2 skin and hematologic toxicity. All patients had symptomatic improvement during treatment.

CONCLUSION: From our institutional experience, low-dose RT in addition to docetaxel and cetuximab is well tolerated. More durable treatment options may exist for definitive treatment; however, this protocol may offer low-morbidity palliation in select patients. 

Proceedings of the 98th Annual Meeting of the American Radium Society - americanradiumsociety.org

Articles in this issue

(S002) A 15-Year Review of Radiation Therapy for Keloids at Two Institutions
(S003) Single-Fraction Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma Bony Metastases Provides Pain Control and Decreases Time to Chemotherapy
(S001) Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Serum Inflammatory Markers in Patients Receiving Radiation Therapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer
(S004) Trend in Second Malignancy Risk for Head and Neck Cancer With Increased Utilization of IMRT: Analysis of SEER Database
(S005) Comparison of Legal Needs of a Group of Patients With Cancer: Economic and Geographic Factors
(S006) Mission Improvement: Lessons From Initiating a Resident-Led Quality Improvement Project on Smoking Cessation at a County Hospital
(S007) Results of a Phase II Trial Using Cetuximab Plus Docetaxel With Low-Dose Fractionated Radiation for Recurrent Unresectable Locally Advanced Head and Neck Carcinoma
(S008) The Effect of Simulation and Treatment Delays for Patients With Oropharyngeal Cancer Receiving Definitive Radiation Therapy in the Era of Risk Stratification Using Smoking and Human Papilloma Virus Status
(S009) Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Boost for Unfavorable Prostate Cancer: A Report on Three-Year Toxicity
(S011) Comparative Study Between Ileal Conduit and Indiana Pouch After Cystectomy for Patients With Carcinoma of Urinary Bladder
(S010) Computed Tomography–Assessed Measures of Bone Mineral Density and Muscle Mass as Predictors of Survival in Men With Prostate Cancer
(S012) Quantitative Imaging to Evaluate the Malignant Potential of Pancreatic Cysts
(S013) Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Concurrent Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
(S014) The Impact of Radiation Therapy on Survival in Surgically Resected, High-Risk Patients With Ampullary Adenocarcinoma: A Population-Based Analysis
(S016) The Impact of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy on Overall Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
Recent Videos
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Compared with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, asciminib was better tolerated in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Using bispecific antibodies before or after CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma is an area of education for community oncologists.
Bulkiness of disease did not appear to impact PFS outcomes with ibrutinib plus venetoclax in the phase 2 CAPTIVATE study.
Optimal cancer survivorship care may entail collaboration between a treating oncologist and a cancer survivorship expert.
Related Content