(S006) Mission Improvement: Lessons From Initiating a Resident-Led Quality Improvement Project on Smoking Cessation at a County Hospital

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 30 No 4_Suppl_1
Volume 30
Issue 4_Suppl_1

Forming a successful quality improvement project is challenging at times but ultimately provides an excellent educational experience for residents and a rewarding opportunity to help patients.

Stephen J. Ramey, MD, Dayssy A. Diaz, MD, Marinellie Vega, BA, Awad A. Ahmed, MD, Shefali R. Gajjar, MD, Raphael L. Yechieli, MD, Cristiane Takita, MD, MBA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Jackson Memorial Hospital and University of Miami; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University

BACKGROUND: To ensure that patients receive the highest quality of care, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the American Board of Radiology have made quality improvement projects a required component of training. Quitting smoking has been shown to decrease toxicity and improve outcomes in patients undergoing cancer therapy. In an effort to decrease lack of access related to cost and to improve outcomes for patients undergoing radiation therapy, a protocol to provide free smoking cessation medications to an underserved population was implemented at a county hospital. This report describes the initial implementation of our prospective smoking cessation quality improvement study.

METHODS: This study prospectively enrolled a culturally diverse group of currently smoking patients at a safety net hospital and provided them with nicotine replacement or varenicline (if they had previously failed to respond to nicotine replacement) in an effort to help them quit smoking. The primary outcomes were self-reported smoking cessation at the end of the 12-week smoking cessation program and at the 3-month follow-up. 

RESULTS: We have garnered a $10,000 grant, received institutional review board (IRB) approval, enrolled seven patients (both Spanish- and English-speaking), and completed the 12-week program with three patients. Bringing such a project to fruition can be rather daunting; however, engaging in this project has allowed residents to gain insight into applying for a grant, writing a protocol, going through the IRB approval process, obtaining consent from patients, training coinvestigators, keeping track of patient toxicities/outcomes, and finding ways to successfully enroll patients. 

CONCLUSION: Forming a successful quality improvement project is challenging at times but ultimately provides an excellent educational experience for residents and a rewarding opportunity to help patients.

Proceedings of the 98th Annual Meeting of the American Radium Society - americanradiumsociety.org

Articles in this issue

(S002) A 15-Year Review of Radiation Therapy for Keloids at Two Institutions
(S003) Single-Fraction Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma Bony Metastases Provides Pain Control and Decreases Time to Chemotherapy
(S001) Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Serum Inflammatory Markers in Patients Receiving Radiation Therapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer
(S004) Trend in Second Malignancy Risk for Head and Neck Cancer With Increased Utilization of IMRT: Analysis of SEER Database
(S005) Comparison of Legal Needs of a Group of Patients With Cancer: Economic and Geographic Factors
(S006) Mission Improvement: Lessons From Initiating a Resident-Led Quality Improvement Project on Smoking Cessation at a County Hospital
(S007) Results of a Phase II Trial Using Cetuximab Plus Docetaxel With Low-Dose Fractionated Radiation for Recurrent Unresectable Locally Advanced Head and Neck Carcinoma
(S008) The Effect of Simulation and Treatment Delays for Patients With Oropharyngeal Cancer Receiving Definitive Radiation Therapy in the Era of Risk Stratification Using Smoking and Human Papilloma Virus Status
(S009) Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Boost for Unfavorable Prostate Cancer: A Report on Three-Year Toxicity
(S011) Comparative Study Between Ileal Conduit and Indiana Pouch After Cystectomy for Patients With Carcinoma of Urinary Bladder
(S010) Computed Tomography–Assessed Measures of Bone Mineral Density and Muscle Mass as Predictors of Survival in Men With Prostate Cancer
(S012) Quantitative Imaging to Evaluate the Malignant Potential of Pancreatic Cysts
(S013) Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Concurrent Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
(S014) The Impact of Radiation Therapy on Survival in Surgically Resected, High-Risk Patients With Ampullary Adenocarcinoma: A Population-Based Analysis
(S016) The Impact of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy on Overall Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
Recent Videos
Developing odronextamab combinations following CAR T-cell therapy failure may help elicit responses in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Compared with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, asciminib was better tolerated in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Using bispecific antibodies before or after CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma is an area of education for community oncologists.
Bulkiness of disease did not appear to impact PFS outcomes with ibrutinib plus venetoclax in the phase 2 CAPTIVATE study.
Related Content