POINT: HER2-Targeted Combinations in Advanced HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 29 No 11
Volume 29
Issue 11

We acknowledge that the “more is better” approach may not always hold true. For example, preclinical data provided a rationale for combining pertuzumab with T-DM1, but recent reports suggest that this strategy may not prove more effective than single-agent T-DM1 therapy in the clinic.

Oncology (Williston Park). 29(11):797-798.

Shom Goel, MD

Eric P. Winer, MD

A Paradigm Shift From a Dogma of the Cytotoxic Era

The primary goals when treating patients with metastatic breast cancer are to improve both duration and quality of life. With cytotoxic chemotherapy, this is typically achieved by using single agents sequentially (rather than combination regimens), switching therapies in the face of disease progression or prohibitive toxicity. This approach is supported by clinical trial data showing that chemotherapy doublets enhance neither the duration nor the quality of life compared with sequential single agents.[1,2] Combination therapy is more likely to be associated with drug toxicity, without clear evidence of benefit.

We argue that the same principle does not hold true when using targeted agents for advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 2–positive breast cancer. Rather, there is often a strong case for combining the anti-HER2 antibody trastuzumab with another HER2-directed therapy. Unlike with chemotherapy, the efficacy-vs-toxicity trade-off often favors combination approaches in the setting of HER2-positive disease.

The notion that combining anti-HER2 therapies might be particularly effective stems from the fact that each of these agents targets the HER2 signaling pathway differently. Trastuzumab interferes with ligand-independent HER2-HER3 interactions and prevents cleavage of HER2 at the membrane, whereas pertuzumab prevents ligand-dependent HER2-HER3 interactions. In contrast, lapatinib inhibits the function of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and HER2 kinases.[3] Both antibodies, but not lapatinib, also invoke antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) against tumor cells.

Trastuzumab + Pertuzumab

Striking preclinical and clinical data support use of the trastuzumab + pertuzumab combination. HER2-HER3 heterodimers are the dominant mediators of signaling in HER2-positive breast cancers[4]; through enhanced prevention of HER2-HER3 interactions, trastuzumab and pertuzumab act synergistically against tumor cells in vitro.[5]

In keeping with laboratory data, results of the BO17929 clinical trial suggest synergistic antitumor activity when trastuzumab and pertuzumab are combined. In this nonrandomized study, one cohort of patients whose metastatic disease was progressing on trastuzumab was treated with pertuzumab alone, yielding an overall response rate (ORR) of only 3%. When these patients then switched to the trastuzumab + pertuzumab combination (ie, after their disease had progressed on both trastuzumab and pertuzumab used individually), an ORR of 18% was observed.[6] The notable ORR with trastuzumab + pertuzumab in patients in whom each agent used individually had failed speaks to the benefit of using these agents in combination.

Further data supporting use of the trastuzumab + pertuzumab combination has come from the randomized phase III Clinical Evaluation of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab (CLEOPATRA) study.[7] Although this first-line metastatic trial did not specifically compare combination vs sequential anti-HER2 therapy, the addition of pertuzumab to a docetaxel/trastuzumab backbone yielded an unprecedented 15-month improvement in overall survival (OS). This improvement came at the cost of extra toxicity (diarrhea, mucositis, rash, and febrile neutropenia), but the magnitude of the benefit and relatively modest toxicity have cemented the position of trastuzumab + pertuzumab as an integral component of first-line therapy for advanced HER2-positive breast cancer.

Trastuzumab + Lapatinib

The other clinically relevant combination is trastuzumab + lapatinib. Lapatinib is often active against trastuzumab-resistant cell lines,[8] and the trastuzumab + lapatinib combination can act synergistically in vitro.[9] This synergy might arise because lapatinib stabilizes HER2 at the cell membrane, potentiating the effects of trastuzumab and enhancing signal inhibition and apoptosis.[9,10]

Trial data also support use of the trastuzumab + lapatinib combination. In the randomized EGF104900 study, trastuzumab + lapatinib prolonged OS by more than 4 months compared with lapatinib monotherapy in a cohort of heavily pretreated, trastuzumab-resistant patients.[11] Further, trastuzumab + lapatinib was associated with a trend towards improved quality of life,[12] partly reflecting the nonoverlapping toxicities of these agents. Whether the survival benefit seen was due to synergistic inhibition of HER2 signaling or to the persistent influence of trastuzumab-related ADCC in the trastuzumab + lapatinib arm is unknown.

In summary, targeted anti-HER2 agents can act synergistically, and when used in the trastuzumab + pertuzumab or trastuzumab + lapatinib combinations, can improve patient outcomes at the price of manageable toxicity. Indeed, in clinical practice, we would not consider using pertuzumab without concomitant trastuzumab, and would only use lapatinib in conjunction with trastuzumab and/or chemotherapy, but never as a single agent.

We acknowledge that the “more is better” approach may not always hold true. For example, preclinical data provided a rationale for combining pertuzumab with the antibody-drug conjugate ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1),[13] but recent reports suggest that this strategy may not prove more effective than single-agent T-DM1 therapy in the clinic.[14] This discordance between preclinical and clinical data requires further investigation, and reminds us that each new combination regimen must be assessed on its individual merits.

Financial Disclosure: The authors’ institution has received research funding from Genentech. Neither Dr. Goel nor Dr. Winer has any significant personal financial interest in or other relationship with the manufacturer of any product or provider of any service mentioned in this article.

References:

1. Sledge GW, Neuberg D, Bernardo P, et al. Phase III trial of doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and the combination of doxorubicin and paclitaxel as front-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: an intergroup trial (E1193). J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:588-92.

2. Miles D, Vukelja S, Moiseyenko V, et al. Survival benefit with capecitabine/docetaxel versus docetaxel alone: analysis of therapy in a randomized phase III trial. Clin Breast Cancer. 2004;5:273-8.

3. Stern HM. Improving treatment of HER2-positive cancers: opportunities and challenges. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4:127rv2.

4. Lee-Hoeflich ST, Crocker L, Yao E, et al. A central role for HER3 in HER2-amplified breast cancer: implications for targeted therapy. Cancer Res. 2008;68:5878-87.

5. Nahta R, Hung MC, Esteva FJ. The HER-2-targeting antibodies trastuzumab and pertuzumab synergistically inhibit the survival of breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2004;64:2343-6.

6. Cortés J, Fumoleau P, Bianchi GV, et al. Pertuzumab monotherapy after trastuzumab-based treatment and subsequent reintroduction of trastuzumab: activity and tolerability in patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1594-600.

7. Swain SM, Baselga J, Kim SB, et al; CLEOPATRA Study Group. Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:724-34.

8. Konecny GE, Pegram MD, Venkatesan N, et al. Activity of the dual kinase inhibitor lapatinib (GW572016) against HER-2-overexpressing and trastuzumab-treated breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2006;66:1630-9.

9. Scaltriti M, Verma C, Guzman M, et al. Lapatinib, a HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, induces stabilization and accumulation of HER2 and potentiates trastuzumab-dependent cell cytotoxicity. Oncogene. 2009;28:803-14.

10. Xia W, Gerard CM, Liu L, et al. Combining lapatinib (GW572016), a small molecule inhibitor of ErbB1 and ErbB2 tyrosine kinases, with therapeutic anti-ErbB2 antibodies enhances apoptosis of ErbB2-overexpressing breast cancer cells. Oncogene. 2005;24:6213-21.

11. Blackwell KL, Burstein HJ, Storniolo AM, et al. Overall survival benefit with lapatinib in combination with trastuzumab for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer: final results from the EGF104900 study. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2585-92.

12. Wu Y, Amonkar MM, Sherrill BH, et al. Impact of lapatinib plus trastuzumab versus single-agent lapatinib on quality of life of patients with trastuzumab-refractory HER2+ metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:2582-90.

13. Phillips GD, Fields CT, Li G, et al. Dual targeting of HER2-positive cancer with trastuzumab emtansine and pertuzumab: critical role for neuregulin blockade in antitumor response to combination therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:456-68.

14. Roche. Roche provides update on phase III MARIANNE study in people with previously untreated advanced HER2-positive breast cancer. 2014.http://www.roche.com/media/store/releases/med-cor-2014-12-19.htm. Accessed October 16, 2015.

Recent Videos
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Heather Zinkin, MD, states that reflexology improved pain from chemotherapy-induced neuropathy in patients undergoing radiotherapy for breast cancer.
Study findings reveal that patients with breast cancer reported overall improvement in their experience when receiving reflexology plus radiotherapy.
Patients undergoing radiotherapy for breast cancer were offered 15-minute nurse-led reflexology sessions to increase energy and reduce stress and pain.
Whole or accelerated partial breast ultra-hypofractionated radiation in older patients with early breast cancer may reduce recurrence with low toxicity.
Ultra-hypofractionated radiation in those 65 years or older with early breast cancer yielded no ipsilateral recurrence after a 10-month follow-up.
The unclear role of hypofractionated radiation in older patients with early breast cancer in prior trials incentivized research for this group.
Related Content