Renal Mass Biopsies May Help Patients Bypass Surgery

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 19 No 2
Volume 19
Issue 2

Using renal mass biopsy to guide treatment decisions for small tumors is cost-effective relative to direct surgery, and can spare many patients unnecessary surgical procedures, according to Massachusetts General Hospital researchers.

Using renal mass biopsy to guide treatment decisions for small tumors is cost-effective relative to direct surgery, and can spare many patients unnecessary surgical procedures, according to Massachusetts General Hospital researchers.

Most small renal masses are detected incidentally in imaging and their current treatment is direct surgery, said lead researcher Pari Pandharipande, MD, a radiologist in the abdominal imaging and interventional radiology department at MGH. Many small renal masses, however, are benign-or indolent if they are malignant-and so less invasive management strategies should be considered, she said.

After constructing a decision-analytic Markov model, the researchers determined surgery was about $3,500 more expensive than biopsy and resulted in a comparable minimally lower life expectancy. Biopsy therefore dominated surgery from a cost-effectiveness perspective (RSNA 2009 abstract SSG09-04).

The researchers assumed a biopsy sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 100%. The researchers also assumed a postsurgery mortality rate of 1.6%. Among imaging-detected masses, 77% were assumed to reflect renal cell carcinoma. Biopsy did not dominate surgery under some conditions, for example, when sensitivity was lower than 78%, when surgical mortality was less than 1%, and when prevalence of renal cancer was greater than 87%.

The researchers used a competing choices cost-effectiveness analysis to compare biopsy with surgery. If one strategy had a lower life expectancy and a higher cost than another, it was considered dominated. If not, an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was computed and strategy preference was assessed based on an assumed $75,000 per quality adjusted life year societal willingness-to-pay threshold.

The long-term outcomes of life expectancy and lifetime costs after biopsy and surgery were estimated by using a decision-analytic Markov model. The cohort in the base-case analysis was 65-year-old men with incidental renal masses. All patients started with small incidental renal masses and underwent either surgery or biopsy. Patients receiving biopsy could have a true or false-positive or false-negative result. Patients with negative biopsy results underwent CT surveillance for up to five years. Patients with positive and nondiagnostic biopsy specimens underwent direct surgery.

Recent Videos
A review of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma shows radiological tumor burden as an independent prognostic factor for survival.
A phase 2 trial is assessing ubamatamab in patients with MUC16-expressing SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma and epithelioid sarcoma.
Analysis of 2 phase 1 trials compared gut biome diversity between standard of care with or without CBM588 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Although no responses were observed in 11 patients receiving abemaciclib monotherapy, combination therapies with abemaciclib may offer clinical benefit.
Findings show no difference in overall survival between various treatments for metastatic RCC previously managed with immunotherapy and TKIs.
An epigenomic profiling approach may help pick up the entire tumor burden, thereby assisting with detecting sarcomatoid features in those with RCC.
Rohit Gosain, MD; Sumanta Kumar Pal, MD, FASCO; and Rahul Gosain, MD, presenting slides
Related Content