(S002) Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma Metastases

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 28 No 4_Suppl_1
Volume 28
Issue 4_Suppl_1

Radiobiology studies suggest that soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is a radioresistant tumor. We reviewed our institutional outcomes of patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy for metastatic STS.

Kenneth Merrell, Samuel Francis, Benjamin Mou, Christopher Hallemeier, Kenneth Olivier; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic; University of Utah School of Medicine

Background: Radiobiology studies suggest that soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is a radioresistant tumor. Primary therapy for localized and oligometastatic STS is surgical resection, often in combination with radiation therapy (RT). Stereotactic body RT (SBRT) allows delivery of large conformal doses of radiation, potentially overcoming radioresistance. We reviewed our institutional outcomes of patients treated with SBRT for metastatic STS.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on 21 patients with 30 metastatic STS lesions who received SBRT at Mayo Clinic between May 2008 and June 2013. Patients were treated with 3D conformal, static-field, or volumetric arc intensity-modulated radiation therapy. The median dose (cGy) and fractionation of lung, bone, liver, and soft tissue was 5,000/5, 2,400/1, 4,250/5, and 4,000/4, respectively. Tumor response was scored using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1). Toxicity was scored using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (CTCAE v4). Local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: Median age was 49 years (range: 30–85 yr). Median follow-up time was 24 months (range: 3–65 yr). Median tumor size was 24 mm (range: 6–145 mm). The most common histologies included pleomorphic sarcoma (n = 5, 24%), leiomyosarcoma (n = 4, 19%), and synovial cell sarcoma (n = 3, 14%), with 95% (n = 20) being high-grade sarcoma. The sites that were treated included bone (n = 11, 36.6%), lung (n = 15, 50%), liver (n = 2, 6.7%), and soft tissue (n = 2, 6.7%). LC at 12, 24, and 48 months was 94.4%, 82.6%, and 82.6%, respectively. Rates of complete response, partial response, and stable disease were 6% (n = 2), 43% (n = 13), and 47% (n = 14), respectively. There were two local failures: one after a partial response and one in a patient with progressive disease on the first follow-up scan. Univariate analysis demonstrated no association with histologic subtype, tumor size, site treated, or RT dose with regard to LC. Median survival was 24 months, with rates of OS at 12, 24, and 48 months of 74.4%, 57.9%, and 12.5%, respectively. Acute and late toxicities were rare, with none higher than grade II. The most frequent toxicities included acute pain flare (n = 2), acute nausea (n = 3), and late cough (n = 2).

Conclusions: SBRT provides excellent local control for metastatic STS. Treatments were well tolerated, with no side effects greater than grade II. Most patients received SBRT after failing multiple lines of chemotherapy, and thus, survival was poor. This study demonstrates that SBRT is an excellent option for local therapy in metastatic STS and warrants further investigation.

Proceedings of the 96th Annual Meeting of the American Radium Society - americanradiumsociety.org

Articles in this issue

(S002) Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma Metastases
(S001) Limb-Sparing Surgery and Intraoperative Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Primary, Nonmetastatic Extremity and Limb-Girdle Soft Tissue Sarcoma
(S003) Disparities in Stage at Diagnosis and Survival in Adult Cancer Patients According to Insurance Status
(S004) Radiation Publications Underrepresented in High-Impact General Medical and Oncology Journals 
(S005) Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Stage II Endometrial Carcinoma: Is Brachytherapy Alone Sufficient for Local Control?
(S006) Extended-Field IMRT With Concomitant Boost for Node-Positive Cervical Cancer: Analysis of Regional Control Rate and Recurrence Pattern
(S007) Stereotactic Radiosurgery to the Brain With Concurrent BRAF Inhibitors for Melanoma Metastases
(S008) Use of Mobile Devices for Creation of Survivorship Care Plans
(S009) Two-Year Outcomes Following Triapine Radiochemotherapy for Cervical Cancer 
(S010) Prospective and Real-Time Data Analysis of Image-Guided Radiotherapy Across a Multinational Pediatrics Consortium: Methodology and Considerations 
(S011) Comparison of Toxicities and Outcomes for Conventional and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Early Glottic Carcinoma
(S013) Adjuvant Radiation Therapy and Temozolomide for Anaplastic Gliomas: The Twelve-Year Washington University Experience
(S014) Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Treatment of Brainstem Metastases
(S015) Temporal Lobe Radionecrosis After Skull Base Radiotherapy: Dose-Volume Predictors 
(S012) Prognostic Value of Radiographic Extracapsular Extension in Locally Advanced Non-Oropharyngeal Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancers
Recent Videos
Performance status, age, and comorbidities may impact benefit seen with immunotherapy vs chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.
Developing odronextamab combinations following CAR T-cell therapy failure may help elicit responses in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Compared with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, asciminib was better tolerated in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Using bispecific antibodies before or after CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma is an area of education for community oncologists.
Related Content