(S012) Prognostic Value of Radiographic Extracapsular Extension in Locally Advanced Non-Oropharyngeal Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancers

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 28 No 4_Suppl_1
Volume 28
Issue 4_Suppl_1

Previous data from our institution suggest that imaging evidence of extracapsular extension, identified on pretreatment CT scans, independently predicts for worse distant control and survival for oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (OPC) patients undergoing radiation therapy. In this present study, we sought to validate these findings in non-OPC head and neck squamous cell cancers.

Jerry T. Liu, MD, Benjamin H. Kann, BS, Michael Buckstein, MD, PhD, Richard Bakst, MD, Eric Genden, MD, Marshall Posner, MD, Peter Som, MD, Vishal Gupta, MD; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Background: Pathologic extracapsular extension (pECE) in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNCs) is associated with poor prognosis. Previous data from our institution suggest that imaging evidence of extracapsular extension (rECE), identified on pretreatment CT scans, independently predicts for worse distant control and survival for oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (OPC) patients undergoing radiation therapy. In this present study, we sought to validate these findings in non-OPC HNCs.

Methods: From our departmental database, 121 patients with locally advanced (cN+) non-OPC HNCs were treated in our department with definitive or adjuvant radiation therapy (± induction chemotherapy and/or concurrent chemotherapy) from 2006–2012. Thirteen patients had recurrent disease at presentation, seven patients discontinued treatment due to noncompliance or other factors, two patients underwent reirradiation of the treated region, and three patients did not have accessible pretreatment CT studies. The remaining 96 patients (nasopharynx [n = 18], hypopharynx [n = 16], larynx [n = 22], oral cavity/lip [n = 24], nasal cavity/sinus [n = 3], and unknown primary [n = 13]) were selected for this study, and all pretreatment CT studies were reviewed by our head/neck radiologist for evidence of rECE. Patients were stratified by presence of rECE, age, gender, race (black vs nonblack), smoking history (≥ 10 vs < 10 pack-years), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS), T-stage, N-stage, overall stage, and treatment type. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed regarding the impact of these factors on locoregional control (LRC), distant control (DC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Patients who underwent initial neck dissection (n = 42) were analyzed for the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of rECE as a predictor for pECE.

Results: At a median follow-up of 27 months (range: 3–94 mo), 56 (58%) patients had rECE and 40 (42%) did not. These groups were well balanced for median age, gender, race, smoking history, PS, and treatment type. Patients with rECE were more likely to have cN2–3 disease versus those without rECE (86% vs 75%, respectively; P = .028). Patients with rECE had significantly worse LRC (3-yr: 67% vs 88%; P = .032), DC (3-yr: 69% vs 88%; P = .017), PFS (3-yr: 57% vs 79%; P = .017), and OS (3-yr: 57% vs 87%; P = .018). On multivariate analysis, rECE was found to be an independent predictor for worse LRC (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36–10.79), DC (HR = 3.71; 95% CI, 1.24–11.12), PFS (HR = 2.70; 95% CI, 1.19–6.11), and OS (HR = 2.87; 95% CI, 1.06–7.81). For patients who underwent definitive surgery, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of rECE to predict for pECE were 70%, 67%, 79%, and 56% respectively.

Conclusions: As previously reported for OPC, presence of rECE, compared with lack of rECE, portends worse prognosis for patients with non-OPC HNCs undergoing definitive or adjuvant radiation therapy. For these patients, presence of rECE is an independent predictor for worse LRC, DC, PFS, and OS. Further studies, with larger cohorts and longer follow-up, are needed to validate these findings and determine how rECE can be used to guide clinical management in these patients.

Proceedings of the 96th Annual Meeting of the American Radium Society - americanradiumsociety.org

Articles in this issue

(S002) Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma Metastases
(S001) Limb-Sparing Surgery and Intraoperative Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Primary, Nonmetastatic Extremity and Limb-Girdle Soft Tissue Sarcoma
(S003) Disparities in Stage at Diagnosis and Survival in Adult Cancer Patients According to Insurance Status
(S004) Radiation Publications Underrepresented in High-Impact General Medical and Oncology Journals 
(S005) Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Stage II Endometrial Carcinoma: Is Brachytherapy Alone Sufficient for Local Control?
(S006) Extended-Field IMRT With Concomitant Boost for Node-Positive Cervical Cancer: Analysis of Regional Control Rate and Recurrence Pattern
(S007) Stereotactic Radiosurgery to the Brain With Concurrent BRAF Inhibitors for Melanoma Metastases
(S008) Use of Mobile Devices for Creation of Survivorship Care Plans
(S009) Two-Year Outcomes Following Triapine Radiochemotherapy for Cervical Cancer 
(S010) Prospective and Real-Time Data Analysis of Image-Guided Radiotherapy Across a Multinational Pediatrics Consortium: Methodology and Considerations 
(S011) Comparison of Toxicities and Outcomes for Conventional and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Early Glottic Carcinoma
(S013) Adjuvant Radiation Therapy and Temozolomide for Anaplastic Gliomas: The Twelve-Year Washington University Experience
(S014) Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Treatment of Brainstem Metastases
(S015) Temporal Lobe Radionecrosis After Skull Base Radiotherapy: Dose-Volume Predictors 
(S012) Prognostic Value of Radiographic Extracapsular Extension in Locally Advanced Non-Oropharyngeal Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancers
Recent Videos
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Compared with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, asciminib was better tolerated in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Using bispecific antibodies before or after CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma is an area of education for community oncologists.
Bulkiness of disease did not appear to impact PFS outcomes with ibrutinib plus venetoclax in the phase 2 CAPTIVATE study.
Optimal cancer survivorship care may entail collaboration between a treating oncologist and a cancer survivorship expert.
Related Content