(S025) Quality of Life Following GammaKnife Radiosurgery for Single and Multiple Brain Metastases

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 30 No 4_Suppl_1
Volume 30
Issue 4_Suppl_1

QOL preservation in patients with terminal illnesses, such as brain metastasis, must remain paramount as healthcare technology continues to progress. In the present investigation, 72% of patients maintained their QOL following GKRS, with 24% of patients experiencing clinically significant improvement.

Jacob A. Miller, BS, Rupesh Kotecha, Gene Barnett, MD, John H. Suh, MD, Lilyana Angelov, MD, Erin Murphy, MD, Michael Vogelbaum, MD, Alireza Mohammadi, MD, Samuel T. Chao, MD; Cleveland Clinic Foundation

INTRODUCTION: The median survival following metastasis to the brain is less than 10 months; 10% to 20% of all cancer patients suffer from such metastases, highlighting the significance of quality-of-life (QOL) preservation. Radiosurgical treatments, including GammaKnife radiosurgery (GKRS), offer excellent local control of intracranial disease. However, QOL outcomes following GKRS have been poorly characterized, particularly for patients with multiple treated metastases. 

METHODS: A prospectively collected database of patient-reported measures was queried for all patients undergoing GKRS for brain metastasis. The EuroQol (EQ)-5D and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 measures were used. Time to EQ-5D deterioration was the primary outcome. Proportional hazards modeling was used to control for confounding differences among patients with single and multiple metastases.

RESULTS: A total of 122 treatments (67 patients) for 421 lesions were eligible for inclusion. Intracranial failure occurred following 35% of treatments. Among 421 lesions, 8% enlarged radiologically following GKRS. Salvage whole-brain radiation therapy (RT) was conducted following 16% of cases, while GKRS was conducted following 50% of cases. Median follow-up was 12 months.

All subscores of the EQ-5D instrument worsened significantly (P < .01) at last follow-up. Clinically significant EQ-5D deterioration occurred following 28% of treatments, while improvement occurred following 24%. Overall PHQ-9 score did not differ significantly at last follow-up. However, patients reported greater difficulty in daily activities secondary to depressive symptoms (P = .02). PHQ-9 failure was observed following 35% of treatments. At last follow-up, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) worsened significantly (P < .01). 

After controlling for confounding characteristics, patients with more than three brain metastases experienced more rapid QOL deterioration (hazard ratio, 2.13 [95% CI, 1.28–3.60]; P < .01) than those with a single metastasis. 

CONCLUSIONS: QOL preservation in patients with terminal illnesses, such as brain metastasis, must remain paramount as healthcare technology continues to progress. In the present investigation, 72% of patients maintained their QOL following GKRS, with 24% of patients experiencing clinically significant improvement. 

Proceedings of the 98th Annual Meeting of the American Radium Society - americanradiumsociety.org

Articles in this issue

(S002) A 15-Year Review of Radiation Therapy for Keloids at Two Institutions
(S003) Single-Fraction Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma Bony Metastases Provides Pain Control and Decreases Time to Chemotherapy
(S001) Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Serum Inflammatory Markers in Patients Receiving Radiation Therapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer
(S004) Trend in Second Malignancy Risk for Head and Neck Cancer With Increased Utilization of IMRT: Analysis of SEER Database
(S005) Comparison of Legal Needs of a Group of Patients With Cancer: Economic and Geographic Factors
(S006) Mission Improvement: Lessons From Initiating a Resident-Led Quality Improvement Project on Smoking Cessation at a County Hospital
(S007) Results of a Phase II Trial Using Cetuximab Plus Docetaxel With Low-Dose Fractionated Radiation for Recurrent Unresectable Locally Advanced Head and Neck Carcinoma
(S008) The Effect of Simulation and Treatment Delays for Patients With Oropharyngeal Cancer Receiving Definitive Radiation Therapy in the Era of Risk Stratification Using Smoking and Human Papilloma Virus Status
(S009) Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Boost for Unfavorable Prostate Cancer: A Report on Three-Year Toxicity
(S011) Comparative Study Between Ileal Conduit and Indiana Pouch After Cystectomy for Patients With Carcinoma of Urinary Bladder
(S010) Computed Tomography–Assessed Measures of Bone Mineral Density and Muscle Mass as Predictors of Survival in Men With Prostate Cancer
(S012) Quantitative Imaging to Evaluate the Malignant Potential of Pancreatic Cysts
(S013) Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Concurrent Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
(S014) The Impact of Radiation Therapy on Survival in Surgically Resected, High-Risk Patients With Ampullary Adenocarcinoma: A Population-Based Analysis
(S016) The Impact of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy on Overall Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
Recent Videos
Performance status, age, and comorbidities may impact benefit seen with immunotherapy vs chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.
Developing odronextamab combinations following CAR T-cell therapy failure may help elicit responses in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Compared with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, asciminib was better tolerated in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Using bispecific antibodies before or after CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma is an area of education for community oncologists.
Related Content