(S049) Comparison of Central Nervous System Toxicity Profiles Following Radiosurgery vs Whole-Brain Radiation Among Patients Treated With Immunotherapy

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 30 No 4_Suppl_1
Volume 30
Issue 4_Suppl_1

GammaKnife radiosurgery appears to be safe regardless of whether it is delivered before or after checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy. Conversely, WBRT delivered after immunotherapy was associated with heightened rates of grade ≥ 3 toxicity, including life-threatening cerebral edema, in approximately one-quarter of courses in this sample.

Charles E. Rutter, MD, Trevor Bledsoe, MD, Mark Bi, Roy H.  Decker, MD, PhD; Yale University School of Medicine

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy is increasingly used for patients with advanced malignancies, many of whom will also require treatment for brain metastases at some point during their illness. However, the safety of brain radiation after immunotherapy is unknown. We therefore sought to compare the toxicity profiles of GammaKnife radiosurgery (GKRS) vs whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) among patients treated with immunotherapy.

METHODS: Patients treated with checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy at our institution who also received GKRS or WBRT before or after the initiation of immunotherapy were identified. Toxicity data were obtained and classified according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare occurrence of acute grade ≥ 3 toxicity between courses of GKRS vs WBRT, as well as within the GKRS and WBRT groups, based upon relative timing of radiation and the initiation of immunotherapy.

RESULTS: A total of 94 courses were identified, consisting of 71 courses of GKRS (33 before and 38 after immunotherapy) and 23 courses of WBRT (8 before and 15 after immunotherapy). Grade ≥ 3 toxicity occurred in three (9.4%) GKRS courses before and four (10.8%) courses after immunotherapy (P = .58). WBRT after immunotherapy was associated with a nonstatistically significant increase in grade ≥ 3 toxicity (42.9% vs 12.5%, respectively; P = .19). Rates of grade ≥ 3 toxicity of either GKRS or WBRT before immunotherapy did not differ (9.4% vs 12.5%; P = .99). Grade ≥ 3 toxicity was significantly higher with WBRT vs GKRS when delivered after immunotherapy (42.9% vs 10.8%; P = .02). Acute grade 4 cerebral edema occurred in four WBRT courses following immunotherapy (26.7%).

CONCLUSIONS: GKRS appears to be safe regardless of whether it is delivered before or after checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy. Conversely, WBRT delivered after immunotherapy was associated with heightened rates of grade ≥ 3 toxicity, including life-threatening cerebral edema, in approximately one-quarter of courses in this sample. These results provide an early assessment of the safety of integrating immunotherapy and brain radiation, and require further validation.

Proceedings of the 98th Annual Meeting of the American Radium Society -americanradiumsociety.org

Articles in this issue

(S002) A 15-Year Review of Radiation Therapy for Keloids at Two Institutions
(S003) Single-Fraction Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma Bony Metastases Provides Pain Control and Decreases Time to Chemotherapy
(S001) Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Serum Inflammatory Markers in Patients Receiving Radiation Therapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer
(S004) Trend in Second Malignancy Risk for Head and Neck Cancer With Increased Utilization of IMRT: Analysis of SEER Database
(S005) Comparison of Legal Needs of a Group of Patients With Cancer: Economic and Geographic Factors
(S006) Mission Improvement: Lessons From Initiating a Resident-Led Quality Improvement Project on Smoking Cessation at a County Hospital
(S007) Results of a Phase II Trial Using Cetuximab Plus Docetaxel With Low-Dose Fractionated Radiation for Recurrent Unresectable Locally Advanced Head and Neck Carcinoma
(S008) The Effect of Simulation and Treatment Delays for Patients With Oropharyngeal Cancer Receiving Definitive Radiation Therapy in the Era of Risk Stratification Using Smoking and Human Papilloma Virus Status
(S009) Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Boost for Unfavorable Prostate Cancer: A Report on Three-Year Toxicity
(S011) Comparative Study Between Ileal Conduit and Indiana Pouch After Cystectomy for Patients With Carcinoma of Urinary Bladder
(S010) Computed Tomography–Assessed Measures of Bone Mineral Density and Muscle Mass as Predictors of Survival in Men With Prostate Cancer
(S012) Quantitative Imaging to Evaluate the Malignant Potential of Pancreatic Cysts
(S013) Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Concurrent Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
(S014) The Impact of Radiation Therapy on Survival in Surgically Resected, High-Risk Patients With Ampullary Adenocarcinoma: A Population-Based Analysis
(S016) The Impact of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy on Overall Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
Recent Videos
Harmonizing protocols across the health care system may bolster the feasibility of giving bispecifics to those with lymphoma in a community setting.
Although accuracy remains a focus in whole-body MRI testing in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, comfortable testing experiences may ease anxiety.
Subsequent testing among patients in a prospective study may affirm the ability of cfDNA sequencing to detect cancers in those with Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
cfDNA sequencing may allow for more accessible, frequent, and sensitive testing compared with standard surveillance in Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
STX-478 showed efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors regardless of whether they had kinase domain or helical PI3K mutations.
STX-478 may avoid adverse effects associated with prior PI3K inhibitors that lack selectivity for the mutated protein vs the wild-type protein.
Phase 1 data may show the possibility of rationally designing agents that can preferentially target PI3K mutations in solid tumors.
Funding a clinical trial to further assess liquid biopsy in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome may help with detecting cancers early across the board.
Michael J. Hall, MD, MS, FASCO, discusses the need to reduce barriers to care for those with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, including those who live in rural areas.
Related Content