(S023) Stage I Lung SBRT Clinical Practice Patterns

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 28 No 4_Suppl_1
Volume 28
Issue 4_Suppl_1

In this retrospective study, we sought to investigate the dose prescription pattern use in the US for patients receiving SBRT.

S023: Figure

Christopher D. Corso, MD, PhD, Henry S. Park, MD, MPH, Amy C. Moreno, BS, Anthony W. Kim, MD, Zain Husain, MD, James B. Yu, MD, Roy H. Decker, MD, PhD; Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University

Introduction: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a technique that has become increasingly utilized over the last decade in the treatment of patients with stage I non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While prior studies have suggested optimal biological effective dose (BED) versus necessary minimum BED for lung SBRT, no standardized clinical guidelines exist. In this retrospective study, we sought to investigate the dose prescription pattern use in the US for patients receiving SBRT.

Methods: Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), adult patients aged 19 years and older with a clinical diagnosis of stage I NSCLC (cT1–2, cN0, cM0) between 2003 and 2011 whose primary treatment involved radiosurgery to the lung were identified. BED was calculated for each patient using a lung alpha/beta ratio of 10 and the recorded fraction number and total dose. Patients were excluded if their reported BED was greater than 300 or less than 10 to exclude data entry errors in the database. The most common dose-fraction prescriptions were analyzed during the years 2005, 2008, and 2011.

Results: A total of 6,324 patients were reported to have received radiosurgery to the lung, and 5,582 were analyzed as having reported BEDs within the predefined range. The overall mean and median BEDs were 130.1 and 124.8, respectively. Of these patients, 89.6% was prescribed a regimen with a BED ≥ 100. However, when confined to the three most recent years (2009–2011), the mean BED fell to 127.4, and only 74.5% of patients were prescribed a regimen with BED ≥ 100. The most common prescriptions overall were 60 Gy in 3 fractions (n = 1275, 22.8%), 48 Gy in 4 fractions (n = 937, 16.8%), 50 Gy in 5 fractions (n = 688, 12.3%), and 54 Gy in 3 fractions (n = 674, 12.1%). Analysis of the prescription trends from 2005, 2008, and 2011 revealed decreased utilization of 60 Gy in 3 fractions (26.3% in 2005 to 13.3% in 2011) and increased utilization of 50 Gy in 5 fractions (0% in 2005 to 19.3% in 2011), 54 Gy in 3 fractions (4.2% in 2005 to 13.2% in 2011), and 50 Gy in 4 fractions (0% in 2005 to 8.1% in 2011).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that despite phase II evidence demonstrating the best published local control and overall survival to date with a regimen of 54 Gy in 3 fractions (corrected), over 25% of patients with stage I NSCLC treated with SBRT in recent years have been prescribed regimens that provide a BED of less than 100. Possible explanations for this include the increasing use of SBRT for treating centrally located tumors or tumors near organs at risk and increased adoption of SBRT by physicians who are new to the technology and, consequently, more conservative in their target prescription BED.

Proceedings of the 96th Annual Meeting of the American Radium Society - americanradiumsociety.org

Articles in this issue

(S002) Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma Metastases
(S001) Limb-Sparing Surgery and Intraoperative Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Primary, Nonmetastatic Extremity and Limb-Girdle Soft Tissue Sarcoma
(S003) Disparities in Stage at Diagnosis and Survival in Adult Cancer Patients According to Insurance Status
(S004) Radiation Publications Underrepresented in High-Impact General Medical and Oncology Journals 
(S005) Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Stage II Endometrial Carcinoma: Is Brachytherapy Alone Sufficient for Local Control?
(S006) Extended-Field IMRT With Concomitant Boost for Node-Positive Cervical Cancer: Analysis of Regional Control Rate and Recurrence Pattern
(S007) Stereotactic Radiosurgery to the Brain With Concurrent BRAF Inhibitors for Melanoma Metastases
(S008) Use of Mobile Devices for Creation of Survivorship Care Plans
(S009) Two-Year Outcomes Following Triapine Radiochemotherapy for Cervical Cancer 
(S010) Prospective and Real-Time Data Analysis of Image-Guided Radiotherapy Across a Multinational Pediatrics Consortium: Methodology and Considerations 
(S011) Comparison of Toxicities and Outcomes for Conventional and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Early Glottic Carcinoma
(S013) Adjuvant Radiation Therapy and Temozolomide for Anaplastic Gliomas: The Twelve-Year Washington University Experience
(S014) Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Treatment of Brainstem Metastases
(S015) Temporal Lobe Radionecrosis After Skull Base Radiotherapy: Dose-Volume Predictors 
(S012) Prognostic Value of Radiographic Extracapsular Extension in Locally Advanced Non-Oropharyngeal Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancers
Recent Videos
Preliminary phase 2 trial data show durvalumab plus lenalidomide was superior to durvalumab alone in refractory/advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.
Performance status, age, and comorbidities may impact benefit seen with immunotherapy vs chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.
Developing odronextamab combinations following CAR T-cell therapy failure may help elicit responses in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Related Content