Skin Cancer & Melanoma

Latest News

Data from RELATIVITY-047 show consistent benefits with nivolumab/relatlimab across most patient subgroups, including those with BRAF-mutated disease.
Nivolumab/Relatlimab Shows Sustained Efficacy in Advanced Melanoma

February 15th 2025

Data from RELATIVITY-047 show consistent benefits with nivolumab/relatlimab across most patient subgroups, including those with BRAF-mutated disease.

RP1/Nivolumab Earns Priority Review in Anti–PD-1 Failed Advanced Melanoma
RP1/Nivolumab Earns Priority Review in Anti–PD-1 Failed Advanced Melanoma

January 21st 2025

Investigators of the phase 3 C-POST trial will continue to follow up with patients and assess the key secondary end point of overall survival.
Adjuvant Cemiplimab Boosts DFS in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma

January 13th 2025

Cosibelimab has been approved by the FDA as a treatment for patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.
FDA Approves Cosibelimab in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma

December 13th 2024

Vusolimogene oderparepvec in combination with nivolumab has received breakthrough therapy designation from the FDA in advanced melanoma.
FDA Assigns BTD and Receives BLA for RP1 Combo in Advanced Melanoma

November 22nd 2024

More News


Site Logo

GM-CSF and IL-2 Combination as Adjuvant Therapy in Cutaneous Melanoma

April 2nd 2005

Cytokines have been used in the treatment of patients with cutaneousmelanoma. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor(GM-CSF, sargramostim [Leukine]) leads to dendritic cell/macrophagepriming and activation, and also increases interleukin-2 (IL-2)receptor expression on T lymphocytes. IL-2 creates lymphokineactivatedkiller cells and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte cells. In thisopen-label, single-arm study of 16 high-risk patients, we combined thesetwo agents to take advantage of their different but complementary functions.All patients underwent potentially curative surgery. Postoperatively,each patient received GM-CSF at 125 μg/m2/d subcutaneously(SC) for 14 days; this was followed by IL-2 at 9 million IU/m2/d SC for4 days, and then 10 to 12 days of no treatment. In addition, patientswho had large tumors that could yield over 100 million live tumor cellsreceived autologous melanoma vaccines. The duration of follow-upranged from 21 to 42 months (median: 27 months). During follow-up,five patients developed metastases. This program was carried out on anoutpatient basis, and no hospitalization was required. It was well toleratedwith minimal side effects. The combination treatment regimen ofGM-CSF and IL-2 with or without autologous vaccine used adjuvantlyappears to benefit high-risk melanoma patients; further clinical testingof this regimen is warranted.


Site Logo

Melanoma Vaccines: What We Know So Far

January 1st 2005

Vaccines are a promising but still experimental treatment for melanoma.They are intended to stimulate immune responses against melanomaand by so doing, increase resistance against and slow the progressionof this cancer. Key requirements for vaccines to be effectiveare that they contain antigens that can stimulate tumor-protective immuneresponses and that some of these antigens are present on thetumor to be treated. Unfortunately, these antigens are still not known.To circumvent this problem, polyvalent vaccines can be constructedcontaining a broad array of melanoma-associated antigens. Severalstrategies are available to construct such polyvalent vaccines; each hasadvantages and disadvantages. Clinical trials have shown that vaccinesare safe to use and have much less toxicity than current therapy formelanoma. Vaccines can stimulate both antibody and T-cell responsesagainst melanoma, with the type of response induced, its frequency,and its magnitude depending on the vaccine and the adjuvant agentused. A growing body of evidence suggests that vaccines can be clinicallyeffective. This evidence includes correlations between vaccineinducedantibody or T-cell responses and improved clinical outcome,clearance of melanoma markers from the circulation, improved survivalcompared to historical controls, and most convincingly, two randomizedtrials in which the recurrence-free survival of vaccine-treatedpatients was significantly longer than that of control groups.


Site Logo

Management of Metastatic Cutaneous Melanoma

October 1st 2004

The results of treatment for metastatic melanoma remain disappointing.Single-agent chemotherapy produces response rates ranging from8% to 15%, and combination chemotherapy, from 10% to 30%. However,these responses are usually not durable. Immunotherapy, particularlyhigh-dose interleukin (IL)-2 (Proleukin), has also shown a lowresponse rate of approximately 15%, although it is often long-lasting.In fact, a small but finite cure rate of about 5% has been reported withhigh-dose IL-2. Phase II studies of the combination of cisplatin-basedchemotherapy with IL-2 and interferon-alfa, referred to as biochemotherapy,have shown overall response rates ranging from 40% to60%, with durable complete remissions in approximately 8% to 10% ofpatients. Although the results of the phase II single-institution studieswere encouraging, phase III multicenter studies have reported conflictingresults, which overall have been predominantly negative. Variousfactors probably explain these discrepancies including differentbiochemotherapy regimens, patient selection, and, most importantly,“physician selection.” Novel strategies are clearly needed, and the mostencouraging ones for the near future include high-dose IL-2 in combinationwith adoptive transfer of selected tumor-reactive T cells afternonmyeloablative regimens, BRAF inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy,and the combination of chemotherapeutic agents andbiochemotherapy with oblimersen sodium (Genasense).