‘Absolutely Important’ to Develop Better Ways to Predict Kidney Cancer Recurrence, Says Expert

Video

Future research must address ways to improve the prediction of kidney cancer recurrence to better inform patients, says an expert from the Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust.

Questions concerning disease recurrence among patients with renal cell carcinoma—a type of kidney cancer—need to be answered with future research, according to Axel Bex, MD, PhD, a urologic surgeon at the Specialist Centre For Kidney Cancer, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, and a professor at University College London, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science.

During the 2022 Society for Urologic Oncology (SUO) Annual Meeting, CancerNetwork® spoke with Bex about his presentation on new developments in adjuvant therapy for renal cell carcinoma.

Bex also said that the use of gene-expression profiles as predictive biomarkers of treatment response is another development in the field that is being explored in the BIONIKK trial (NCT02960906), which is evaluating nivolumab (Opdivo) and ipilimumab (Yervoy) in metastatic kidney cancer. Reducing the rate of overtreatment for metastatic kidney cancer is another important challenge, according to Bex.

Transcript:

First of all, we know from the metastatic setting that there are certain molecular subtypes that seem to predict that these patients respond better to immunotherapy, but they haven't made it into general practice yet as biomarkers. But as we heard here at SUO, there are some trials being planned.

We also have the BIONIKK trial in Europe, for example, that would look at certain gene expression profiles, and select patients who are much more likely to respond. Now, what we need to avoid in the future is there's a 40% over-treatment rate. That's something we already learned from [tumor growth inhibition] trials. It is absolutely important that we improve our prediction of recurrences. Patients want to know: do [my diseases] recur? And if so, is there something that helps me? And if there's something that helps me, is it likely that I will respond to it? These 2 questions need to be answered, and I think we have the tools.

Recent Videos
Harmonizing protocols across the health care system may bolster the feasibility of giving bispecifics to those with lymphoma in a community setting.
Although accuracy remains a focus in whole-body MRI testing in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, comfortable testing experiences may ease anxiety.
Subsequent testing among patients in a prospective study may affirm the ability of cfDNA sequencing to detect cancers in those with Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
cfDNA sequencing may allow for more accessible, frequent, and sensitive testing compared with standard surveillance in Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
STX-478 showed efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors regardless of whether they had kinase domain or helical PI3K mutations.
STX-478 may avoid adverse effects associated with prior PI3K inhibitors that lack selectivity for the mutated protein vs the wild-type protein.
Phase 1 data may show the possibility of rationally designing agents that can preferentially target PI3K mutations in solid tumors.
Funding a clinical trial to further assess liquid biopsy in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome may help with detecting cancers early across the board.
Michael J. Hall, MD, MS, FASCO, discusses the need to reduce barriers to care for those with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, including those who live in rural areas.
Related Content