20 Final Overall Survival (OS) Analysis From the Phase 3 TROPiCS-02 Study of Sacituzumab Govitecan (SG) in Patients (pts) With Hormone Receptor–Positive/HER2-Negative (HR+/HER2–) Metastatic Breast Cancer (mBC)

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement41st Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 38
Issue 4
Pages: 23-24

20 Final Overall Survival (OS) Analysis From the Phase 3 TROPiCS-02 Study of Sacituzumab Govitecan (SG) in Patients (pts) With Hormone Receptor–Positive/HER2-Negative (HR+/HER2–) Metastatic Breast Cancer (mBC)

20 Final Overall Survival (OS) Analysis From the Phase 3 TROPiCS-02 Study of Sacituzumab Govitecan (SG) in Patients (pts) With Hormone Receptor–Positive/HER2-Negative (HR+/HER2–) Metastatic Breast Cancer (mBC)

Background

Traditional hormone receptor–positive (HR+)/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC) treatment is associated with poor outcomes and quality of life. Sacituzumab govitecan is a Trop-2–directed antibody-drug conjugate approved in the United States for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer who received 1 or more prior systemic therapies and for patients with pretreated HR+/HER2-negative mBC. In the phase 3 TROPiCS-02 study, sacituzumab govitecan demonstrated a statistically significant overall survival (OS) benefit vs treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) in patients with pretreated, ET-resistant HR+/HER2-negative mBC at the second planned interim OS analysis with 390 events (median, 14.4 vs 11.2 months; HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.65-0.96]; P = .02) this is considered the final analysis per the protocol. Here, we report the results of an exploratory analysis of OS from TROPiCS-02 with a longer median follow-up (12.75 months).

Methods

Eligible patients with HR+/HER2-negative mBC who received prior taxane, ET, CDK4/6 inhibitor, and 2 to 4 prior lines of chemotherapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive sacituzumab govitecan (10 mg/kg intravenously on days 1 and 8, every 21 days) or TPC until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was progression-free survival by blinded independent central review per RECIST v1.1. Key secondary end points included OS and safety. An exploratory analysis evaluated OS by HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC).

Results

A total of 543 patients (median prior chemotherapy for mBC, 3; visceral metastases, 95%) were randomized to receive sacituzumab govitecan (n = 272) or TPC (n = 271). At data cutoff (December 1, 2022), 437 OS events had occurred, with 47 (8.7%) new deaths in the sacituzumab govitecan vs TPC groups (22 [8.1%] vs 25 [9.2%]) since the second planned interim analysis. Sacituzumab govitecan continues to demonstrate improved OS vs TPC (median, 14.5 vs 11.2 months; HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.65-0.95]; nominal P = .01). The OS rates for sacituzumab govitecan vs TPC were 60.9% (95% CI, 54.8-66.4) and 47.1% (95% CI, 41.0-53.0) at 12 months, 39.2% (95% CI, 33.4-45.0) and 31.7% (95% CI, 26.2-37.4) at 18 months, and 25.6% (95% CI, 20.4-31.1) and 21.1% (95% CI, 16.3-26.3) at 24 months. Ninety-two percent of patients were evaluable for HER2 status by immunohistochemistry (IHC) (HER2 IHC 0, n = 217; HER2-low, n = 283). Sacituzumab govitecan demonstrated improved OS vs TPC in the HER2 IHC 0 (median, 13.6 vs 10.8 months; HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.63-1.13]) and HER2-low (median, 15.4 vs 11.5 months, HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.57-0.97) groups. Updated safety will be reported in the presentation.

Conclusions

This TROPiCS-02 analysis confirms the clinically meaningful OS benefit of sacituzumab govitecan over single-agent chemotherapy in patients with pretreated, endocrine-resistant HR+/HER2-negative mBC. This improvement was independent of HER2-low status. This analysis reinforces sacituzumab govitecan as an effective and safe treatment for this
patient population.

Articles in this issue

1 Centrally Located Breast Cancer Is More Aggressive in Bahraini Patients
1 Centrally Located Breast Cancer Is More Aggressive in Bahraini Patients
2 Is Laterality in Breast Cancer Still Worth Studying? Local Experience in Bahrain
2 Is Laterality in Breast Cancer Still Worth Studying? Local Experience in Bahrain
3 Gender Disparities in the  National Institutes of Health  Funding for Breast Cancer
3 Gender Disparities in the National Institutes of Health Funding for Breast Cancer
4 Bacopaside: Exploring Its Potential in Addressing Chemoresistance and Modulating Doxorubicin Accumulation in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells
4 Bacopaside: Exploring Its Potential in Addressing Chemoresistance and Modulating Doxorubicin Accumulation in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells
5 Predictors of Axillary Complete Pathologic Response in Hormone Receptor–Positive, HER2-Negative, Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer
5 Predictors of Axillary Complete Pathologic Response in Hormone Receptor–Positive, HER2-Negative, Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer
6 Treatment Outcomes of the KEYNOTE-522 Regimen in an Ethnically Diverse Patient Population
6 Treatment Outcomes of the KEYNOTE-522 Regimen in an Ethnically Diverse Patient Population
7 Real-World Efficacy and Adverse Events of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Experience
7 Real-World Efficacy and Adverse Events of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Experience
8 Using a Liquid Biopsy Mediated Approach for Determination of HER2 Amplification Status in Patient Samples
8 Using a Liquid Biopsy Mediated Approach for Determination of HER2 Amplification Status in Patient Samples
9 Elacestrant (ELA) vs Standard-of-Care (SOC) in ER+/HER2–Advanced (adv) or Metastatic Breast Cancer (mBC) with ESR1 Mutation (ESR1-mut): Key Biomarkers and Clinical Subgroup Analyses From the Phase 3 EMERALD Trial
9 Elacestrant (ELA) vs Standard-of-Care (SOC) in ER+/HER2–Advanced (adv) or Metastatic Breast Cancer (mBC) with ESR1 Mutation (ESR1-mut): Key Biomarkers and Clinical Subgroup Analyses From the Phase 3 EMERALD Trial
10 Real-World Effectiveness of Palbociclib (PAL) Plus Aromatase Inhibitors (AI) in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) and Cardiovascular Diseases (CVD)
10 Real-World Effectiveness of Palbociclib (PAL) Plus Aromatase Inhibitors (AI) in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) and Cardiovascular Diseases (CVD)
11 Phase 3 Study of Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy, Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Endocrine Therapy for Early-Stage High-Risk ER+/HER2– Breast Cancer: KEYNOTE-756
11 Phase 3 Study of Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy, Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Endocrine Therapy for Early-Stage High-Risk ER+/HER2– Breast Cancer: KEYNOTE-756
12 EMERALD Trial Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Patients (pts) With ER+/HER2- Advanced or Metastatic Breast  Cancer (mBC) Comparing Oral Elacestrant vs Standard-of-Care (SoC) Endocrine Therapy
12 EMERALD Trial Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Patients (pts) With ER+/HER2- Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer (mBC) Comparing Oral Elacestrant vs Standard-of-Care (SoC) Endocrine Therapy
13 The Cause and Eradication of Breast Cancer
13 The Cause and Eradication of Breast Cancer
14 Outcomes With First-Line (1L) Ribociclib (RIB) + Endocrine Therapy (ET) vs Physician’s Choice Combination Chemotherapy (combo CT) by Age in Pre/Perimenopausal Patients (pts) With Aggressive HR+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC): A Subgroup Analysis of the RIGHT Choice Trial
14 Outcomes With First-Line (1L) Ribociclib (RIB) + Endocrine Therapy (ET) vs Physician’s Choice Combination Chemotherapy (combo CT) by Age in Pre/Perimenopausal Patients (pts) With Aggressive HR+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC): A Subgroup Analysis of the RIGHT Choice Trial
15 Concurrent Use of Abemaciclib and Radiation Therapy (RT) Among Patients With HR+, HER2– Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC): Real-World Utilization and Safety
15 Concurrent Use of Abemaciclib and Radiation Therapy (RT) Among Patients With HR+, HER2– Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC): Real-World Utilization and Safety
Recent Videos
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Heather Zinkin, MD, states that reflexology improved pain from chemotherapy-induced neuropathy in patients undergoing radiotherapy for breast cancer.
Study findings reveal that patients with breast cancer reported overall improvement in their experience when receiving reflexology plus radiotherapy.
Patients undergoing radiotherapy for breast cancer were offered 15-minute nurse-led reflexology sessions to increase energy and reduce stress and pain.
Whole or accelerated partial breast ultra-hypofractionated radiation in older patients with early breast cancer may reduce recurrence with low toxicity.
Ultra-hypofractionated radiation in those 65 years or older with early breast cancer yielded no ipsilateral recurrence after a 10-month follow-up.
The unclear role of hypofractionated radiation in older patients with early breast cancer in prior trials incentivized research for this group.
Related Content