22 Updated Results From VERITAC Evaluating Vepdegestrant, a PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera (PROTAC) Estrogen Receptor (ER) Degrader, in ER-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)–Negative Advanced Breast Cancer

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement41st Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 38
Issue 4
Pages: 25-26

22 Updated Results From VERITAC Evaluating Vepdegestrant, a PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera (PROTAC) Estrogen Receptor (ER) Degrader, in ER-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)–Negative Advanced Breast Cancer

22 Updated Results From VERITAC Evaluating Vepdegestrant, a PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera (PROTAC) Estrogen Receptor (ER) Degrader, in ER-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)–Negative Advanced Breast Cancer

Background

Vepdegestrant (ARV-471) is an oral proteolysis-targeting chimeric (PROTAC) estrogen receptor (ER) degrader with activity toward wild-type and mutant ER. The phase 2 expansion (VERITAC) of a phase 1/2 study tested 2 vepdegestrant doses (200 mg once daily and 500 mg once daily) in heavily pretreated patients with ER+/HER2-negative (HER2–) advanced breast cancer. Vepdegestrant at 200 mg daily was selected as the phase 3 monotherapy dose based on comparable efficacy and favorable tolerability vs 500 mg daily and robust ER degradation (data cutoff of June 6, 2022). We present updated data for the vepdegestrant 200-mg daily dose cohort after 12 additional months of follow-up from the first report.

Methods

Patients with ER+/HER2– locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer who had received 1 or more prior endocrine therapies for 6 months or more, at least 1 CDK4/6 inhibitor, and less than 1 chemotherapy regimen were eligible. The primary end point was clinical benefit rate (CBR; rate of confirmed complete response, partial response, or stable disease at 24 weeks or more).

Results

As of June 6, 2023, 35 patients received vepdegestrant at 200 mg daily; 34 (97.1%) were female, and the median age was 63 years (range, 42-79). Patients had received a median of 4 prior regimens (range, 1-9) in any setting (CDK4/6 inhibitors, 100%; aromatase inhibitors, 88.6%; fulvestrant, 74.3%; chemotherapy, 74.3% [45.7% in metastatic setting]). CBR was 37.1% (95% CI, 21.5-55.1) in all evaluable patients (n = 35), and the objective response rate was 8.3% (95% CI, 1.0-27.0) in 24 patients with measurable disease at baseline. Median progression-free survival in all evaluable patients was 3.5 months (95% CI, 1.8-8.2). A total of 14 patients in the 200 mg dose cohort received treatment for at least 24 weeks (4 for at least 48 weeks) with 1 patient ongoing. No patients required a dose reduction due to a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE); 2 (5.7%) patients discontinued vepdegestrant due to TEAEs (grade 3 QT prolongation and grade 3 anemia). The most common treatment-related AEs (15% or more) were fatigue (43%), hot flush (20%), and nausea (17%); all were grade 1/2. Substantial on-treatment decreases in mutant ESR1 circulating tumor DNA levels were observed and sustained for multiple treatment cycles.

Conclusions

Durable clinical activity with vepdegestrant at 200 mg daily was seen in heavily pretreated patients with ER+/HER2– advanced breast cancer. Vepdegestrant at 200 mg daily continued to show
a favorable safety profile. The ongoing phase 3 VERITAC-2
study (NCT05654623) is evaluating vepdegestrant at 200 mg daily vs fulvestrant in patients with ER+/HER2– advanced breast cancer after prior combination CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy and endocrine therapy.

Articles in this issue

1 Centrally Located Breast Cancer Is More Aggressive in Bahraini Patients
1 Centrally Located Breast Cancer Is More Aggressive in Bahraini Patients
2 Is Laterality in Breast Cancer Still Worth Studying? Local Experience in Bahrain
2 Is Laterality in Breast Cancer Still Worth Studying? Local Experience in Bahrain
3 Gender Disparities in the  National Institutes of Health  Funding for Breast Cancer
3 Gender Disparities in the National Institutes of Health Funding for Breast Cancer
4 Bacopaside: Exploring Its Potential in Addressing Chemoresistance and Modulating Doxorubicin Accumulation in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells
4 Bacopaside: Exploring Its Potential in Addressing Chemoresistance and Modulating Doxorubicin Accumulation in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells
5 Predictors of Axillary Complete Pathologic Response in Hormone Receptor–Positive, HER2-Negative, Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer
5 Predictors of Axillary Complete Pathologic Response in Hormone Receptor–Positive, HER2-Negative, Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer
6 Treatment Outcomes of the KEYNOTE-522 Regimen in an Ethnically Diverse Patient Population
6 Treatment Outcomes of the KEYNOTE-522 Regimen in an Ethnically Diverse Patient Population
7 Real-World Efficacy and Adverse Events of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Experience
7 Real-World Efficacy and Adverse Events of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Experience
8 Using a Liquid Biopsy Mediated Approach for Determination of HER2 Amplification Status in Patient Samples
8 Using a Liquid Biopsy Mediated Approach for Determination of HER2 Amplification Status in Patient Samples
9 Elacestrant (ELA) vs Standard-of-Care (SOC) in ER+/HER2–Advanced (adv) or Metastatic Breast Cancer (mBC) with ESR1 Mutation (ESR1-mut): Key Biomarkers and Clinical Subgroup Analyses From the Phase 3 EMERALD Trial
9 Elacestrant (ELA) vs Standard-of-Care (SOC) in ER+/HER2–Advanced (adv) or Metastatic Breast Cancer (mBC) with ESR1 Mutation (ESR1-mut): Key Biomarkers and Clinical Subgroup Analyses From the Phase 3 EMERALD Trial
10 Real-World Effectiveness of Palbociclib (PAL) Plus Aromatase Inhibitors (AI) in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) and Cardiovascular Diseases (CVD)
10 Real-World Effectiveness of Palbociclib (PAL) Plus Aromatase Inhibitors (AI) in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) and Cardiovascular Diseases (CVD)
11 Phase 3 Study of Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy, Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Endocrine Therapy for Early-Stage High-Risk ER+/HER2– Breast Cancer: KEYNOTE-756
11 Phase 3 Study of Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy, Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Endocrine Therapy for Early-Stage High-Risk ER+/HER2– Breast Cancer: KEYNOTE-756
12 EMERALD Trial Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Patients (pts) With ER+/HER2- Advanced or Metastatic Breast  Cancer (mBC) Comparing Oral Elacestrant vs Standard-of-Care (SoC) Endocrine Therapy
12 EMERALD Trial Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Patients (pts) With ER+/HER2- Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer (mBC) Comparing Oral Elacestrant vs Standard-of-Care (SoC) Endocrine Therapy
13 The Cause and Eradication of Breast Cancer
13 The Cause and Eradication of Breast Cancer
14 Outcomes With First-Line (1L) Ribociclib (RIB) + Endocrine Therapy (ET) vs Physician’s Choice Combination Chemotherapy (combo CT) by Age in Pre/Perimenopausal Patients (pts) With Aggressive HR+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC): A Subgroup Analysis of the RIGHT Choice Trial
14 Outcomes With First-Line (1L) Ribociclib (RIB) + Endocrine Therapy (ET) vs Physician’s Choice Combination Chemotherapy (combo CT) by Age in Pre/Perimenopausal Patients (pts) With Aggressive HR+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC): A Subgroup Analysis of the RIGHT Choice Trial
15 Concurrent Use of Abemaciclib and Radiation Therapy (RT) Among Patients With HR+, HER2– Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC): Real-World Utilization and Safety
15 Concurrent Use of Abemaciclib and Radiation Therapy (RT) Among Patients With HR+, HER2– Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC): Real-World Utilization and Safety
Recent Videos
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Heather Zinkin, MD, states that reflexology improved pain from chemotherapy-induced neuropathy in patients undergoing radiotherapy for breast cancer.
Study findings reveal that patients with breast cancer reported overall improvement in their experience when receiving reflexology plus radiotherapy.
Patients undergoing radiotherapy for breast cancer were offered 15-minute nurse-led reflexology sessions to increase energy and reduce stress and pain.
Whole or accelerated partial breast ultra-hypofractionated radiation in older patients with early breast cancer may reduce recurrence with low toxicity.
Ultra-hypofractionated radiation in those 65 years or older with early breast cancer yielded no ipsilateral recurrence after a 10-month follow-up.
The unclear role of hypofractionated radiation in older patients with early breast cancer in prior trials incentivized research for this group.
Related Content