3 Real-world Outcomes of Sacituzumab Govitecan in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: A Single Institution Experience

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement40th Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 37
Issue suppl 4
Pages: 9-10

Background/Objectives

Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) is a complex disease with limited therapeutic options and is associated with a poor prognosis. The treatment landscape for mTNBC has expanded in the last few years, but the optimal sequencing of agents after first-line therapy remains unclear. FDA approval of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) was based on the significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) demonstrated in the ASCENT trial when compared with physician’s choice of chemotherapy in previously treated mTNBC patients. Real-world outcomes for SG have yet to be reported for patients with mTNBC. Primary objective of this study was to analyze outcomes of SG in real-world patients with mTNBC who were treated at our cancer center and the secondary objective was to analyze outcomes in the HER2-low subset of patients.

Materials and Methods

Retrospective review of metastatic breast cancer patients’ (pts) charts treated with SG at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center from 2021 until 2022 was conducted. Clinical and pathological variables including demographics, site of metastases, prior lines of therapy, relative dose intensity (RDI), adverse events (AEs), HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) score, clinical response, and last follow-up were collected. Association with clinical response and survival was evaluated using Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test for continuous variables. Univariate Cox proportional-hazards models were performed to evaluate overall survival. Kaplan-Meir plots and log-rank tests were used for survival analysis. SAS v9.4 was used to perform statistical analysis at a significance level of 0.05.

Results

24 pts enrolled, 22 triple negative and 2 hormone-receptor positive. Median age 58 years (29-84 years). 75% of pts (18/24) received ≥ 3 prior treatment lines in the metastatic setting and 46% (11/24) had ≥ 3 metastatic sites, 7/24 had brain metastasis. 95% (21/22) pts experienced any grade AEs, most commonly diarrhea and fatigue 55% (12/22), neutropenia 50% (11/22), and nausea 41% (9/22). Grade 3 AEs leading to SG interruption and/or dose reduction or discontinuation occurred in 27% (6/22), most commonly neutropenia (23%; 5/22). One pt had grade 4 multiorgan AEs. The ORR was 61% (11/18) with 16.7% (4/18) of pts with stable disease (SD). Response was not assessed in 6 pts. Median duration of response was 5.5 months (IQR, 3-9). The median RDI [relative dose intensity] was 80% (IQR, 50%-90%), 70% (IQR, 60%- 80%), and 60% (IQR,30%-70%) for pts who had a partial response (PR), SD, and progressive disease (PD), respectively. 79% (19/24) of pts had HER2-low disease and responded favorably with a clinical benefit rate (PR or SD for 6 months) of 50% (9/18).

Conclusions

Similar to the ASCENT trial our cohort included heavily pretreated patients with a median of 3 lines of prior therapy that included immunotherapy and PARP inhibitors. In contrast to the ASCENT trial, which excluded patients with brain metastases, approximately 30% (7/24) of our cohort had brain metastases and comparable clinical outcomes. In our heavily pretreated mTNBC population, SG produced comparable disease response, and tolerability, and patients received a similar RDI. Response in the HER2-low subgroup was notable given HER2-low patients were not yet recognized as a clinically relevant subgroup in the ASCENT trial and in light of what is now known about the efficacy of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer. Multi-institutional collaboration is currently ongoing to increase the sample size.

AFFILIATIONS:

Sabah Alaklabi,1 Joseph Elijah,2 Arya Mariam Roy,3 Adrienne Groman,4 Shipra Gandhi3

1Department of Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

2Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY.

3Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY.

4Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY.

Articles in this issue

1 Elacestrant Versus Fulvestrant or Aromatase Inhibitor in a Phase 3 Trial Evaluating Elacestrant, an Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader Versus Standard-of- Care Endocrine Monotherapy for ER+/HER2– Advanced/Metastatic Breast Cancer
1 Elacestrant Versus Fulvestrant or Aromatase Inhibitor in a Phase 3 Trial Evaluating Elacestrant, an Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader Versus Standard-of- Care Endocrine Monotherapy for ER+/HER2– Advanced/Metastatic Breast Cancer
2 Molecular Characterization of HER2-Low Patients Identifies Basal-Enriched Subset With Poor Clinical Outcomes in Real-world Data
2 Molecular Characterization of HER2-Low Patients Identifies Basal-Enriched Subset With Poor Clinical Outcomes in Real-world Data
3 Real-world Outcomes of Sacituzumab Govitecan in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: A Single Institution Experience
3 Real-world Outcomes of Sacituzumab Govitecan in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: A Single Institution Experience
4 Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) + Durvalumab (D) as First-Line (1L) Treatment for Unresectable Locally Advanced/ Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (a/mTNBC): Updated Results From BEGONIA, a Phase 1b/2 Study
4 Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) + Durvalumab (D) as First-Line (1L) Treatment for Unresectable Locally Advanced/ Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (a/mTNBC): Updated Results From BEGONIA, a Phase 1b/2 Study
5 Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Palbociclib Combinations as First- Line Treatment for Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer in Realworld Settings in Argentina and Colombia: Results from the IRIS Study
5 Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Palbociclib Combinations as First- Line Treatment for Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer in Realworld Settings in Argentina and Colombia: Results from the IRIS Study
7 EMERALD Phase 3 Trial of Elacestrant Versus Standard-of- Care Endocrine Therapy in Patients With ER+/HER2– Metastatic Breast Cancer: Updated Results by Duration of Prior CDK4/6i in Metastatic Setting
7 EMERALD Phase 3 Trial of Elacestrant Versus Standard-of- Care Endocrine Therapy in Patients With ER+/HER2– Metastatic Breast Cancer: Updated Results by Duration of Prior CDK4/6i in Metastatic Setting
8 Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) in Advanced Triple- Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC): Updated Results From the Phase 1 TROPION-PanTumor01 Study
8 Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) in Advanced Triple- Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC): Updated Results From the Phase 1 TROPION-PanTumor01 Study
9 Phase 1 TROPION-PanTumor01 Study Evaluating Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) in Unresectable or Metastatic Hormone Receptor–Positive/ Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative Breast Cancer
9 Phase 1 TROPION-PanTumor01 Study Evaluating Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) in Unresectable or Metastatic Hormone Receptor–Positive/ Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative Breast Cancer
11 Real-world Treatment Patterns and Effectiveness of Palbociclib Plus an Aromatase Inhibitor in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Aged 75 Years or Above
11 Real-world Treatment Patterns and Effectiveness of Palbociclib Plus an Aromatase Inhibitor in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Aged 75 Years or Above
12 TIP HARMONIA SOLTI-2101/ AFT-58: A Head-to-Head Phase III Study Comparing Ribociclib (RIB) and Palbociclib (PAL) in Patients (pts) With Hormone Receptor– Positive/HER2-Negative/HER2- Enriched (HR+/HER2−/HER2-E) Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC)
12 TIP HARMONIA SOLTI-2101/ AFT-58: A Head-to-Head Phase III Study Comparing Ribociclib (RIB) and Palbociclib (PAL) in Patients (pts) With Hormone Receptor– Positive/HER2-Negative/HER2- Enriched (HR+/HER2−/HER2-E) Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC)
13 Improved Sensitivity in Identification of ER- and HER2- Expressing Metastatic Breast Cancers With a Combination of Cell & Cell-Free Liquid Biopsy Analysis
13 Improved Sensitivity in Identification of ER- and HER2- Expressing Metastatic Breast Cancers With a Combination of Cell & Cell-Free Liquid Biopsy Analysis
15 Updated Expert Consensus Recommendations for Managing Hyperglycemia and Rash in Patients With PIK3CA-Mutated, Hormone Receptor–Positive (HR+), Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative (HER2–) Advanced Breast Cancer Treated With Alpelisib
15 Updated Expert Consensus Recommendations for Managing Hyperglycemia and Rash in Patients With PIK3CA-Mutated, Hormone Receptor–Positive (HR+), Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative (HER2–) Advanced Breast Cancer Treated With Alpelisib
16 Primary Results From the Randomized Phase II RIGHT Choice Trial of Premenopausal Patients With Aggressive HR+/HER2− Advanced Breast Cancer Treated With Ribociclib + Endocrine Therapy vs Physician’s Choice Combination Chemotherapy
16 Primary Results From the Randomized Phase II RIGHT Choice Trial of Premenopausal Patients With Aggressive HR+/HER2− Advanced Breast Cancer Treated With Ribociclib + Endocrine Therapy vs Physician’s Choice Combination Chemotherapy
17 A Clinical Systematic Literature Review of Treatments Among Patients With Advanced/ Metastatic HER2+ Breast Cancer
17 A Clinical Systematic Literature Review of Treatments Among Patients With Advanced/ Metastatic HER2+ Breast Cancer
20 TIP ELONA: An Open-Label, Phase 1b-2 Study of Elacestrant, in Combination With Onapristone in Patients With Estrogen Receptor– Positive, Progesterone Receptor– Positive, HER2-Negative Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
20 TIP ELONA: An Open-Label, Phase 1b-2 Study of Elacestrant, in Combination With Onapristone in Patients With Estrogen Receptor– Positive, Progesterone Receptor– Positive, HER2-Negative Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
Related Content