Bevacizumab/Everolimus Active in Certain Non–Clear Cell RCC Histologies

Article

The combination of bevacizumab and everolimus had efficacy in patients with unclassified non–clear cell renal cell carcinoma characterized by papillary features, resulting in an objective response rate of 43%.

The combination of the VEGF-directed bevacizumab plus the mTOR-directed everolimus had efficacy in patients with unclassified non–clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) characterized by papillary features, resulting in an objective response rate of 43%.

“Although the trial did not meet its primary endpoint, a striking signal was observed for defined histologic subgroups, specifically those with a significant papillary tumor component,” wrote researcher Martin H. Voss, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), and colleagues in a study published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. “The current findings lend further support to combining mTOR- and VEGF-directed therapy in the papillary and chromophobe variants.”

Voss and colleagues conducted a single-center phase II trial testing everolimus 10 mg once daily plus bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks in 35 patients with treatment-naive nccRCC. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 6 months. The researchers also explored biomarkers using next-generation sequencing (NGS).

Patients in the trial had either unclassified (n = 23), chromophobe (n = 5), papillary (n = 5), or medullary (n = 2) RCC. Looking at the 34 evaluable patients, the median progression-free survival was 11 months; the median overall survival was 18.5 months, and the objective response rate was 29%.

The researchers found that progression-free survival varied by disease histology. Specifically, those patients whose disease had significant papillary or chromophobe features had higher objective response rates compared with other histologies.

Those patients with papillary features, including patients with unclassified disease, had an objective response rate of 43% compared with 11% among patients without these features. The median progression-free survival was 12.9 months compared with 1.9 months and the overall survival was 28.2 months compared with 9.3 months (P < .001).

“We compared baseline clinical features that could account for such discrepancies in outcome, including extent of disease, nephrectomy status, and MSKCC and International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk status, but found no significant difference between the two subgroups,” the researchers wrote. “Our NGS analysis, although limited by sample size, yielded a number of thought-provoking findings.”

The researchers performed NGS for 28 patients with archival tissue. They found somatic mutations in ARID1A in 5 of 14 patients with papillary features, but none were identified in the other RCC variants. All the patients with ARID1A achieved the primary endpoint of 6-month progression-free survival.

“Altogether, the data suggest that ARID1A merits further study for its functional role in papillary RCC variants and as a candidate biomarker for future study of everolimus plus bevacizumab,” the researchers wrote. 

Recent Videos
A review of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma shows radiological tumor burden as an independent prognostic factor for survival.
A phase 2 trial is assessing ubamatamab in patients with MUC16-expressing SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma and epithelioid sarcoma.
Analysis of 2 phase 1 trials compared gut biome diversity between standard of care with or without CBM588 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Although no responses were observed in 11 patients receiving abemaciclib monotherapy, combination therapies with abemaciclib may offer clinical benefit.
Findings show no difference in overall survival between various treatments for metastatic RCC previously managed with immunotherapy and TKIs.
An epigenomic profiling approach may help pick up the entire tumor burden, thereby assisting with detecting sarcomatoid features in those with RCC.
Ongoing research may clarify the potential benefit of avelumab when administered in combination with other agents in advanced urothelial carcinoma.
Spatial analyses may help determine factors that influence responses to sacituzumab govitecan-containing regimens in urothelial carcinoma.
Attending educational sessions may help with understanding how to manage toxicities associated with enfortumab vedotin in rare genitourinary cancers.
Related Content