Cabozantinib Receives FDA Approval for Treating Advanced RCC

Article

Clinicians now have a new targeted therapy option for treating patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who have received prior antiangiogenic therapy.

Clinicians now have a new targeted therapy option for treating patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who have received prior antiangiogenic therapy. On April 25, 2016, Exelixis, Inc. announced that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved cabozantinib (Cabometyx™) tablets for treating patients with advanced RCC.

“Cabometyx is distinct from other approved treatment options, as it targets multiple tyrosine kinases involved in the development of RCC, including MET, AXL, and three VEGF receptors. At the same time, physicians are very familiar with this class of drug and how to use dose adjustments to balance safety and efficacy,” said Toni Choueiri, MD, Clinical Director, Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, in a press release. “The approval of Cabometyx is wonderful news for physicians who are looking for a new option for their previously treated patients with advanced kidney cancer.”

This new agent is the first therapy to demonstrate in a phase III trial clinically meaningful improvements in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR).

The phase III METEOR trial compared cabozantinib with everolimus (Afinitor), a standard-of-care therapy for second-line RCC. Cabozantinib was associated with a 42% reduction in the rate of disease progression. The median PFS for cabozantinib was 7.4 months compared to 3.8 months for everolimus. This new agent also significantly improved the ORR compared with everolimus. Cabozantinib was associated with a 34% reduction in the rate of death compared to everolimus, with a median OS of 21.4 months compared to a median OS of 16.5 months for everolimus.

The most common (frequency ≥25%) adverse reactions in cabozantinib-treated patients included diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, decreased appetite, hand-foot syndrome, hypertension, vomiting, weight loss, and constipation. Dose reduction rates were 60% for cabozantinib and 24% for everolimus in the phase III trial. The rate of treatment discontinuation due to adverse reactions was low, with 10% in each arm and consistent with that previously reported for everolimus.

Results published November 5, 2015, in The New England Journal of Medicine, METEOR was an open-label trial of 658 patients with advanced RCC who had become refractory to at least one prior vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. The trial was conducted at approximately 200 sites in 26 countries. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 60 mg of cabozantinib daily or 10 mg of everolimus daily. All the patients were stratified based on the number of prior VEGF receptor TKI therapies received and on Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center risk criteria.

Cabozantinib targets include MET, AXL, VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, and VEGFR-3. It has been shown in preclinical models to inhibit the activity of these receptors, which are involved in normal cellular function and pathologic processes such as tumor angiogenesis, invasiveness, metastasis, and drug resistance. Cabozantinib will be available in 20 mg, 40 mg, or 60 mg doses. The recommended dose is 60 mg orally, once daily.

 

 

Recent Videos
A review of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma shows radiological tumor burden as an independent prognostic factor for survival.
A phase 2 trial is assessing ubamatamab in patients with MUC16-expressing SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma and epithelioid sarcoma.
Analysis of 2 phase 1 trials compared gut biome diversity between standard of care with or without CBM588 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Although no responses were observed in 11 patients receiving abemaciclib monotherapy, combination therapies with abemaciclib may offer clinical benefit.
Findings show no difference in overall survival between various treatments for metastatic RCC previously managed with immunotherapy and TKIs.
An epigenomic profiling approach may help pick up the entire tumor burden, thereby assisting with detecting sarcomatoid features in those with RCC.
Ongoing research may clarify the potential benefit of avelumab when administered in combination with other agents in advanced urothelial carcinoma.
Spatial analyses may help determine factors that influence responses to sacituzumab govitecan-containing regimens in urothelial carcinoma.
Attending educational sessions may help with understanding how to manage toxicities associated with enfortumab vedotin in rare genitourinary cancers.
Related Content