Dasatinib Offers Some Promise in Rare Sarcoma Subtypes

Article

A trial of five rare sarcoma subtypes found that though dasatinib failed to achieve progression-free survival goals, more than half of patients with certain subtypes did have reasonably good survival outcomes.

A trial of five rare sarcoma subtypes found that though dasatinib failed to achieve a goal of 50% 6-month progression-free survival, more than half of patients with certain subtypes did have reasonably good survival outcomes. Based on these results, dasatinib should be studied in further trials in certain sarcoma subtypes.

“A number of distinct histologic subtypes of sarcoma share the unusual behavior of a low cell proliferation rate but a high risk of local recurrence and systemic spread,” wrote study authors led by Scott M. Schuetze, MD, PhD, of the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor. Alveolar soft-part sarcoma (ASPS), solitary fibrous tumor (SFT), epithelioid sarcoma (ES), chordoma, and low- to intermediate-grade chondrosarcoma (CS) share this feature, and also are largely resistant to chemotherapy.

The new study included 109 patients, 12 with ASPS, 33 with CS, 32 with chordoma, 7 with ES, and 25 with SFT; all were treated with dasatinib, and they were included in a single cohort due to the rarity of these types of cancer. The results were published online ahead of print in Cancer.

The 6-month progression-free survival rate in the entire cohort was 48%, with a median progression-free survival of 5.8 months. The median overall survival was 21.6 months. Certain subtypes fared better than others with dasatinib: the 6-month progression-free survival rate was 62% with ASPS, 47% with CS, 54% with chordoma, 57% with ES, and 30% with SFT. At 5 years, 30% of ASPS patients remained alive, as did 18% of chordoma patients, 9% of CS patients, and 8% of SFT patients; none of the ES patients were alive at 5 years.

Treatment interruption was required in 62 patients (57%), and a dose reduction was required in 36 patients (33%). Those with SFT more frequently required a dose reduction (52%) than those with ES (14%) and ASPS (17%). Discontinuation was due to sarcoma progression in most patients.

Grade 3 and 4 adverse events occurred in 46 and 8 patients, respectively. The most common grade 3 events included pain (17%), dyspnea (11%), pleural effusion (6%), and diarrhea (5%). Six patients died during therapy; two of those were due to general progression of sarcoma, three were due to pulmonary complications of the disease, and one death was unrelated to either the malignancy or the treatment.

One ASPS patient, six CS patients, six chordoma patients, two ES patients, and five SFT patients had an objective tumor response with dasatinib based on the Choi criteria. Only one (a chordoma patient) had an objective response using RECIST criteria.

The authors highlighted the collaborative effort used here in order to accrue enough patients with these rare diseases for a meaningful trial. Though the progression-free survival rate fell short of goals, “more than 50% of patients with ASPS or ES were free of disease progression for more than 6 months, and 50% of the ASPS patients were alive for at least 2 years after enrollment,” they wrote. The various results of the study show that dasatinib is worthy of further study in several of these rare sarcoma subtypes, they concluded.

Recent Videos
Accelerated approval of afami-cel may expand access to therapy for patients who are unable to live near certain treatment centers.
Treatment with afami-cel may offer improved quality of life to patients with metastatic synovial sarcoma compared with continuous chemotherapy.
The difference in adverse effect profiles between sorafenib and nirogacestat may make one treatment more appealing than the other for certain patients with desmoid tumors, says Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
The August CancerNetwork Snap Recap takes a look back at key FDA news updates, as well as expert perspectives on the chemotherapy shortage.
Future developments in the sarcoma space may also involve research on circulating tumor DNA and metabolic therapies, according to Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
Current research in the sarcoma space includes the development of treatment options such as T-cell therapies, and combinations such as TKIs/immunotherapy, according to Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD, states that sitravatinib appears to be active and well tolerated among patients with dedifferentiated or well-differentiated liposarcoma.
Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD, also discusses how the treatment of desmoid tumors has evolved following data supporting the use of sorafenib in this population.
CAR T-cell therapies and immunotherapy agents may offer up new options and even become standard of care in certain sarcoma subtypes.
There are several novel treatments that may be beneficial in several sarcoma subtypes including CAR T-cell therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors, according to Sandra P. D’Angelo, MD.
Related Content