Olaparib Combo Provides Meaningful Benefit in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma

News
Article

Olaparib plus temozolomide appears to prolong median progression-free survival for those with homologous recombination deficient uterine leiomyosarcoma compared with homologous recombination proficient tumors.

"In summary, the combination of olaparib and temozolomide provided encouraging activity in pretreated [uterine leiomyosarcoma], an aggressive sarcoma subtype without an effective targeted therapy," according to the authors of a phase 2 study published in Journal of Clinical Oncology.

"In summary, the combination of olaparib and temozolomide provided encouraging activity in pretreated [uterine leiomyosarcoma], an aggressive sarcoma subtype without an effective targeted therapy," according to the authors of a phase 2 study published in Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Combining olaparib (Lynparza) with temozolomide (Temodar) resulted in meaningful clinical benefit in a small population of patients with advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma previously treated with chemotherapy, according to findings from the phase 2 NCI Protocol 10250 study published in Journal of Clinical Oncology.

With a median follow-up of 22 months, 23% (n = 5/22) of patients achieved an objective response within 6 months of treatment, meeting the study’s primary end point. An additional patient responded to treatment after 11.5 months, resulting in an objective response rate of 27%. In terms of best objective responses, 6 patients had a partial response (PR), 9 had stable disease, 4 had progressive disease, and results were not evaluable in 3 patients. Among those with a PR, the median duration of response was 12.0 months (95% CI, 9.5-not evaluable [NE]).

Olaparib plus temozolomide produced a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.4-NE). The PFS rate was 65% at 6 months, 38% at 12 months, and 22% at 24 months. The median overall survival (OS) was not reached.

“In summary, the combination of olaparib and temozolomide provided encouraging activity in pretreated [uterine leiomyosarcoma], an aggressive sarcoma subtype without an effective targeted therapy,” the study authors wrote. “A randomized phase 2/3 clinical trial [NCT05633381] evaluating olaparib and temozolomide versus investigator’s choice of trabectedin [Yondelis] or pazopanib [Votrient] is underway.”

In the single-arm, open-label, multi-center phase 1/2 NCI Protocol 10250 trial, all patients received 75 mg/m2 of temozolomide orally once a day plus 200 mg of olaparib orally twice a day on days 1 to 7 of continuous 21-day cycles. Investigators performed imaging to assess disease status once every 6 weeks.

The primary end point was best objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST criteria; investigators considered the study regimen to be promising if at least 5 patients achieved a response. Secondary end points included overall ORR, median PFS, median OS, and safety. Determining whether SLFN11 or MGMT RNA expression correlated with clinical benefit was an exploratory objective.

Patients with locally advanced and unresectable or metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma were eligible for enrollment on the study. Additional eligibility criteria included having an ECOG performance status no higher than 2 and disease progression following at least 1 line of systemic treatment for advanced disease.

The study included 22 eligible and evaluable patients who enrolled between August 2019 and February 2020. The median patient age was 55 years (range, 39-71). Most patients had an ECOG performance status of 1 (68%) and metastatic disease (77%). Additionally, most patients had received 3 or more prior lines of therapy (59%) and treatment with gemcitabine/docetaxel (86%).

Three patients with RAD51B, PALB2, and ATR alterations had a best response of stable disease and PFS of 31.5 months, 27.3 months, and 7.1 months, respectively. Among 2 patients with ATRX mutations, the best response of stable disease and PFS was 5.4 months and 2.7 months.

Assessment with the RAD51 foci formation assay in 18 pretreatment biopsies identified 9 homologous recombination repair deficient (dHRR) tumors and 7 HRR proficient (pHRR) tumors. In an exploratory Kaplan-Meier analysis, the median PFS was 11.2 months for those with dHRR tumors vs 5.4 months for those with pHRR tumors (P = .05).

Investigators identified no relationship between PFS and pretreatment levels of SLFN11 (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.52-1.83; P = .90) or MGMT (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.65-1.92; P = .70).

Common any-grade hematologic adverse effects (AEs) included neutropenia (90%), thrombocytopenia (86%), leukopenia (77%), and anemia (68%). Grade 3 hematologic AEs included neutropenia (59%), anemia (32%), and thrombocytopenia (14%).

Nonhematologic AEs included fatigue (54%), nausea (54%), constipation (32%), anorexia (27%), vomiting (22%), diarrhea (18%), and dry skin (14%). Grade 3 events of nausea, rash, and diarrhea occurred in 1 patient each.

Reference

Ingham M, Allred JB, Chen L, et al. Phase II study of olaparib and temozolomide for advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma (NCI Protocol 10250). Published online July 19, 2023.J Clin Oncol. doi:10.1200/JCO.23.00402

Recent Videos
Accelerated approval of afami-cel may expand access to therapy for patients who are unable to live near certain treatment centers.
Treatment with afami-cel may offer improved quality of life to patients with metastatic synovial sarcoma compared with continuous chemotherapy.
The difference in adverse effect profiles between sorafenib and nirogacestat may make one treatment more appealing than the other for certain patients with desmoid tumors, says Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
The August CancerNetwork Snap Recap takes a look back at key FDA news updates, as well as expert perspectives on the chemotherapy shortage.
Future developments in the sarcoma space may also involve research on circulating tumor DNA and metabolic therapies, according to Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
Current research in the sarcoma space includes the development of treatment options such as T-cell therapies, and combinations such as TKIs/immunotherapy, according to Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD, states that sitravatinib appears to be active and well tolerated among patients with dedifferentiated or well-differentiated liposarcoma.
Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD, also discusses how the treatment of desmoid tumors has evolved following data supporting the use of sorafenib in this population.
CAR T-cell therapies and immunotherapy agents may offer up new options and even become standard of care in certain sarcoma subtypes.
There are several novel treatments that may be beneficial in several sarcoma subtypes including CAR T-cell therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors, according to Sandra P. D’Angelo, MD.
Related Content