(P028) Efficacy and Tolerability of Chemoradiation for Lymph Node-Positive Cutaneous Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 28 No 1S
Volume 28
Issue 1S

The efficacy and tolerability of chemoradiation (CRT) for locoregionally advanced cutaneous nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) are investigated.

Lora S. Wang, MD, Elizabeth Handorf, PhD, John A. Ridge, MD, PhD, FACS, Barbara Burtness, MD, Miriam Lango, MD, Ranee Mehra, MD, Jeffrey C. Liu, MD, Thomas J. Galloway, MD; Fox Chase Cancer Center

Introduction: To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of chemoradiation (CRT) for locoregionally advanced cutaneous nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC).

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients treated for high-risk NMSC from 2000–2012. Patients were included if they had pathologic NMSC and evidence of regional lymph node (LN) spread and received an LN dissection and/or parotidectomy. Exclusions were: less than 6 months of follow-up or having received palliative treatment only. The primary endpoints for analysis included locoregional control (LRC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis were used for statistical analysis. The study was approved by the institutional review board (IRB).

Results: A total of 53 patients met our inclusion criteria, 15 (28%) of whom received CRT-cetuximab (6), cisplatin (7), carboplatin (1), and paclitaxel (1). Patients treated with chemotherapy were significantly younger (P = .0001), had larger LNs (P = .024), and a trend toward a greater number of LNs involved (P = .075) and LNs dissected (P = .069). With a median follow-up for 2.2 years (range: 0.5–8.5 yr), 20 (38%) patients had evidence of recurrence, with 16 out of 20 patients failing locoregionally as a component of their disease relapse. At 5 years, LRC was 70%, PFS was 61%, and OS was 47%. The PFS of patients who received RT alone was significantly better than those who received CRT (72% vs 32%; P = .009), although the OS was not significant (P = .22). CRT patients had evidence of aggressive disease: 10 of the 15 in the CRT group (67%) had recurrence of their disease at one or more sites, despite both systemic and locoregional treatment. Eight of the 10 (80%) patients in the CRT group with disease recurrences had distant metastasis as part of their recurrence. CRT was generally well tolerated, although not free of side effects, including acneiform rash, neutropenia, tinnitus, decrease in creatinine clearance, severe dehydration, and/or failure to thrive. There was one grade 4 asymptomatic thrombocytopenia but otherwise no other grade 3 or higher toxicities.

Conclusions: In this series, patients who were treated with multimodality therapy for high-risk NMSC did not do well, and those who were selected for trimodality therapy did exceptionally poorly. The natural history of high-risk NMSC is poorly understood, and appropriate patient selection for the intensification of adjuvant therapy needs clarification.

Articles in this issue

(P113) Age and Marital Status Are Associated With Choice of Mastectomy in Patients Eligible for Breast Conservation Therapy
(P112) Single-Institution Experience With Intrabeam IORT for Treatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer
(P110) Breast Cancer Before Age 40: Current Patterns in Clinical Presentation and Local Management
(P111) Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation With Multicatheter High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy: Feasibility and Results in a Private Practice Cohort
(P115) Breast Cancer Laterality Does Not Influence Overall Survival in a Large Modern Cohort: Implications for Radiation-Related Cardiac Mortality
(P117) Anatomical Variations and Radiation Technique for Breast Cancer
(P116) Bilateral Immediate DIEP Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Experience at a Tertiary Care Institution
(P118) Metadherin Overexpression Is Associated With Improved Locoregional Control After Mastectomy
(P119) Effect of Economic Environment on Use of Postlumpectomy Radiation Therapy for Stage I Breast Cancer
(P120) Immediate Versus Delayed Reconstruction After Mastectomy in the United States Medicare Breast Cancer Patient
(P121) Trend in Age and Racial Disparities in the Receipt of Postlumpectomy Radiation Therapy for Stage I Breast Cancer: 2004–2009
(P122) Streamlining Referring Physicians Orders With ‘Reflex Testing’ Significantly Decreases Time to Resolution for Abnormal Screening Mammograms
(P123) National Trends in the Local Management of Early-Stage Paget Disease of the Breast
(P124) Effect of Inhomogeneity on Cardiac and Lung Dose in Partial-Breast Irradiation Using HDR Brachytherapy
(P125) Breast Cancer Outcomes With Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy for Residual Disease Burden After Full-Dose Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery Followed by Radiation Treatment
Recent Videos
Preliminary phase 2 trial data show durvalumab plus lenalidomide was superior to durvalumab alone in refractory/advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.
Performance status, age, and comorbidities may impact benefit seen with immunotherapy vs chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.
Developing odronextamab combinations following CAR T-cell therapy failure may help elicit responses in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Related Content