(P058) Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Central Lung Tumors: An Analysis of Outcomes and Toxicity

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 28 No 1S
Volume 28
Issue 1S

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly used as the primary treatment for early-stage medically inoperable non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although the role of SBRT is established in the treatment of peripheral lung tumors, the outcomes and toxicities of SBRT for central lung tumors are not well characterized. This study investigates our institutional experience with SBRT for central tumors in NSCLC patients.

Benjamin Mou, MD, Kenneth W. Merrell, MD, Dawn A. Owen, MD, PhD, Katy Nelson, RN, Yolanda I. Garces, MD, Kenneth R. Olivier, MD; Mayo Clinic

Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly used as the primary treatment for early-stage medically inoperable non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although the role of SBRT is established in the treatment of peripheral lung tumors, the outcomes and toxicities of SBRT for central lung tumors are not well characterized. This study investigates our institutional experience with SBRT for central tumors in NSCLC patients.

Materials and Methods: The Mayo Clinic SBRT database prospectively collects patient demographic and treatment-related data for all patients treated at our institution. We performed a retrospective chart review on NSCLC patients with primary and recurrent central lung tumors treated with SBRT between April 2008 and May 2013. The most frequently used dose fractionation regimens were 50 Gy in five fractions and 48 Gy in four fractions delivered over consecutive days. Local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) were measured using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Tumor response was scored using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1). Toxicity was graded using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Common Toxicity Criteria.

Results: A total of 85 central lung tumors from 80 patients were included for analysis. Median age was 74 years (range: 40–91 yr), and median follow-up was 19.1 months (range: 3.3–61.0 mo). There were 54 primary tumors and 31 recurrent tumors. Median tumor size was 2.0 cm (range: 0.6–5.5 cm). There were three local failures, resulting in 2-year and 4-year LC rates of 96.6% and 87.8%, respectively. The median survival was 46.1 months. The 2-year and 4-year OS rates were 69.8% and 39.9%, respectively. Rates of complete response, partial response, and stable disease were 29% (n = 25), 53% (n = 45), and 18% (n = 15), respectively. There were 16 patients with grade III or higher pneumonitis, including one grade IV and one grade V toxicity. The patient with grade V toxicity had a 5.5-cm tumor and prior pneumonectomy. There were no grade III or higher acute toxicities. Toxicities were not associated with tumor size, radiation dose, or previous local therapy. Univariate analysis demonstrated no statistically significant differences in LC or OS between primary or recurrent tumors, histology, tumor size, or radiation dose.

Conclusions: SBRT provides excellent LC for central NSCLC tumors. Toxicity rates are acceptable; however, appropriate patient selection is imperative, as we await results from prospective trials of SBRT for central lung tumors.

Articles in this issue

(P113) Age and Marital Status Are Associated With Choice of Mastectomy in Patients Eligible for Breast Conservation Therapy
(P112) Single-Institution Experience With Intrabeam IORT for Treatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer
(P110) Breast Cancer Before Age 40: Current Patterns in Clinical Presentation and Local Management
(P111) Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation With Multicatheter High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy: Feasibility and Results in a Private Practice Cohort
(P115) Breast Cancer Laterality Does Not Influence Overall Survival in a Large Modern Cohort: Implications for Radiation-Related Cardiac Mortality
(P117) Anatomical Variations and Radiation Technique for Breast Cancer
(P116) Bilateral Immediate DIEP Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Experience at a Tertiary Care Institution
(P118) Metadherin Overexpression Is Associated With Improved Locoregional Control After Mastectomy
(P119) Effect of Economic Environment on Use of Postlumpectomy Radiation Therapy for Stage I Breast Cancer
(P120) Immediate Versus Delayed Reconstruction After Mastectomy in the United States Medicare Breast Cancer Patient
(P121) Trend in Age and Racial Disparities in the Receipt of Postlumpectomy Radiation Therapy for Stage I Breast Cancer: 2004–2009
(P122) Streamlining Referring Physicians Orders With ‘Reflex Testing’ Significantly Decreases Time to Resolution for Abnormal Screening Mammograms
(P123) National Trends in the Local Management of Early-Stage Paget Disease of the Breast
(P124) Effect of Inhomogeneity on Cardiac and Lung Dose in Partial-Breast Irradiation Using HDR Brachytherapy
(P125) Breast Cancer Outcomes With Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy for Residual Disease Burden After Full-Dose Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery Followed by Radiation Treatment
Recent Videos
Preliminary phase 2 trial data show durvalumab plus lenalidomide was superior to durvalumab alone in refractory/advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.
Performance status, age, and comorbidities may impact benefit seen with immunotherapy vs chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.
Developing odronextamab combinations following CAR T-cell therapy failure may help elicit responses in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Related Content