(P151) Poor Long-Term Sexual Recovery With Neoadjuvant Androgen Deprivation Therapy (NADT) Plus Radiotherapy: Results of a Multicenter, Prospective Study

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 28 No 1S
Volume 28
Issue 1S

Long-term effects of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (NADT) with radiotherapy (RT) on patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL) have not been characterized in prospective multicenter studies. We evaluated the effects of NADT on HRQOL for 2 years among patients undergoing RT for newly diagnosed prostate cancer.

Hiram A. Gay, MD, Jingxia Liu, PhD, Jeff M. Michalski, MD, Daniel A. Hamstra, MD, PhD, John T. Wei, MD, Rodney L. Dunn, Eric A. Klein, MD, Howard M. Sandler, MD, Chris Saigal, MD, Mark Litwin, MD, Deborah Kuban, MD, Larry Hembroff, PhD, Meredith Regan, Peter Chang, MD, Martin G. Sanda, MD, the PROSTQA Consortium; Washington University; University of Michigan; Cleveland Clinic; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; University of California; UT MD Anderson Cancer Center; Michigan State University; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Purpose: Long-term effects of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (NADT) with radiotherapy (RT) on patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL) have not been characterized in prospective multicenter studies. We evaluated the effects of NADT on HRQOL for 2 years among patients undergoing RT for newly diagnosed prostate cancer.

Methods: The Prostate Cancer Outcomes and Satisfaction with Treatment Quality Assessment (PROST-QA) Consortium is a prospective, multi-institutional study at nine university-affiliated clinical sites across the US, wherein pretreatment demographic, cancer severity, and treatment details were recorded in a web-based database. HRQOL is measured with the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC)-26 questionnaire via a computer-assisted phone interview (CATI) at pretreatment and at 2 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after the start of NADT. Differences in patient-reported HRQOL were observed between pretreatment and 1 year and 2 years after NADT start (and before definitive RT), with significant differences evaluated by paired t-test.

Results: From among 598 subjects who completed CATI before and 2 years after NADT start, 111 received NADT prior to proceeding with definitive RT. Patients receiving NADT experienced significant impairment in vitality/hormonal (P < .0001), sexual (P < .0001), urinary continence (P = .0005), urinary irritative/obstructive (P = .0001), and bowel (P < .0001) HRQOL after NADT initiation.

Conclusions: Neoadjuvant ADT with RT has clinically significant long-term effects on sexual, vitality/hormonal, and bowel/rectal HRQOL domains. Most profound are the sexual side effects, which also have the least long-term recovery. The hope of long-term improved sexual QOL should not be an argument when comparing RT with NADT and prostatectomy. The significant impact of this therapy on HRQOL needs to be considered before initiating NADT in men.

Articles in this issue

(P113) Age and Marital Status Are Associated With Choice of Mastectomy in Patients Eligible for Breast Conservation Therapy
(P112) Single-Institution Experience With Intrabeam IORT for Treatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer
(P110) Breast Cancer Before Age 40: Current Patterns in Clinical Presentation and Local Management
(P111) Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation With Multicatheter High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy: Feasibility and Results in a Private Practice Cohort
(P115) Breast Cancer Laterality Does Not Influence Overall Survival in a Large Modern Cohort: Implications for Radiation-Related Cardiac Mortality
(P117) Anatomical Variations and Radiation Technique for Breast Cancer
(P116) Bilateral Immediate DIEP Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Experience at a Tertiary Care Institution
(P118) Metadherin Overexpression Is Associated With Improved Locoregional Control After Mastectomy
(P119) Effect of Economic Environment on Use of Postlumpectomy Radiation Therapy for Stage I Breast Cancer
(P120) Immediate Versus Delayed Reconstruction After Mastectomy in the United States Medicare Breast Cancer Patient
(P121) Trend in Age and Racial Disparities in the Receipt of Postlumpectomy Radiation Therapy for Stage I Breast Cancer: 2004–2009
(P122) Streamlining Referring Physicians Orders With ‘Reflex Testing’ Significantly Decreases Time to Resolution for Abnormal Screening Mammograms
(P123) National Trends in the Local Management of Early-Stage Paget Disease of the Breast
(P124) Effect of Inhomogeneity on Cardiac and Lung Dose in Partial-Breast Irradiation Using HDR Brachytherapy
(P125) Breast Cancer Outcomes With Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy for Residual Disease Burden After Full-Dose Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery Followed by Radiation Treatment
Recent Videos
Preliminary phase 2 trial data show durvalumab plus lenalidomide was superior to durvalumab alone in refractory/advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.
Performance status, age, and comorbidities may impact benefit seen with immunotherapy vs chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.
Developing odronextamab combinations following CAR T-cell therapy failure may help elicit responses in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Related Content