Pathology Aids in Diagnosis of Hereditary Leiomyomatosis, RCC

Article

Suspicious pathology from kidney tumors was significantly associated with testing positive for fumarate hydratase mutations, which may aid in the early diagnosis of hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma.

Suspicious pathology from kidney tumors was significantly associated with testing positive for fumarate hydratase mutations, which may aid in the early diagnosis of hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma (HLRCC), according to the results of a study published recently in Cancer.

“Patients with HLRCC may harbor clinically aggressive RCC and often present at a young age with advanced disease, as was true for our cohort,” wrote Ryan P. Kopp, MD, of the department of urology at Oregon Health and Science University, and colleagues. “Moreover, many patients with fumarate hydratase mutations and aggressive RCC do not have cutaneous leiomyomas to aid in the diagnosis. Our study demonstrates that prospective identification of special features by the pathologist and recognition by the clinician can have a substantial impact on the diagnosis of HLRCC.”

According to the study, the early identification of patients with HLRCC is important because patients with RCC are often diagnosed with advanced disease and at a younger age. Additionally, early identification allows for family screening for the syndrome. HLRCC often presents with identification of skin leiomyomas; however, pathologic assessment of renal tumors may help to identify patients with the underlying fumarate hydratase mutation, which causes the syndrome.

With this study, Kopp and colleagues evaluated if an association existed between prospectively identified HLRCC suspicious pathology and the presence of fumarate hydratase mutations among patients referred for genetic testing for the risk of hereditary cancer.

Twenty-nine patients underwent fumarate hydratase testing. For the study, suspicious pathology was defined as a report of HLRCC histologic features identified during a prospective pathologic assessment.

Patients found to have suspicious pathology were significantly younger (35 vs 51 years, P = .010). In addition, those patients with suspicious pathology and kidney tumors more frequently had stage pT3 or higher RCC compared with those without suspicious pathology (100% vs 33%; P = .006).

Testing identified fumarate hydratase mutations in 8 of the 21 patients (38%) with suspicious pathology and 1 patient without. In all, 7 of these patients with suspicious pathology had kidney cancer, and all of them developed metastatic disease.

When the researchers analyzed suspicious pathology by tissue type, they found that suspicious pathology from renal tumors was the only tumor significantly associated with positive testing for fumarate hydratase mutation (P = .013). Renal suspicious pathology had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 70%.

“The findings reported here indicate that pathologic features may aid in the diagnosis when other diagnostic criteria are not observed,” the researchers wrote. “Although cutaneous leiomyomas are a hallmark of HLRCC, the diagnosis of these lesions often requires a dermatologic assessment, and internists, urologists, or gynecologists may be less able to identify these skin lesions.”

Recent Videos
A review of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma shows radiological tumor burden as an independent prognostic factor for survival.
A phase 2 trial is assessing ubamatamab in patients with MUC16-expressing SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma and epithelioid sarcoma.
Analysis of 2 phase 1 trials compared gut biome diversity between standard of care with or without CBM588 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Although no responses were observed in 11 patients receiving abemaciclib monotherapy, combination therapies with abemaciclib may offer clinical benefit.
Findings show no difference in overall survival between various treatments for metastatic RCC previously managed with immunotherapy and TKIs.
An epigenomic profiling approach may help pick up the entire tumor burden, thereby assisting with detecting sarcomatoid features in those with RCC.
Ongoing research may clarify the potential benefit of avelumab when administered in combination with other agents in advanced urothelial carcinoma.
Spatial analyses may help determine factors that influence responses to sacituzumab govitecan-containing regimens in urothelial carcinoma.
Attending educational sessions may help with understanding how to manage toxicities associated with enfortumab vedotin in rare genitourinary cancers.
Related Content