Petros Grivas, MD, PhD, on the Impact of First-Line Maintenance Avelumab in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

Video

Petros Grivas, MD, PhD, discusses the impact of avelumab on patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma in the first-line maintenance setting.

At the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, CancerNetwork® spoke with Petros Grivas, MD, PhD, of University of Washington School of Medicine, about the impact of avelumab (Bavencio) on patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma in the first-line maintenance setting.

Data from the phase 2 JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial (NCT02603432), which examined the agent in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic disease, reinforced that if patients were are treated with avelumab in the first-line maintenance setting, the time spent on the first- and second-line therapy was prolonged vs best supportive care.

Transcript:

The data from this particular abstract reinforced that if [patients] get avelumab as a maintenance therapy, the time that [they] spent in the first- and second-line therapy is prolonged compared [with] patients who [received] best supportive care. It was very difficult for us to granularly evaluate the progression-free survival in the subsequent line of therapy [following] progression in the maintenance trial. [However], with this abstract, we tried to estimate the overall time that [patients] spent in the first 2 lines of therapy after randomization. The data, if anything, substantiate or reinforce the benefit that avelumab has as a switch maintenance therapy in this population.

Reference

Grivas P, Park SH, Voog E, et al. Avelumab first-line (1L) maintenance plus best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC alone for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC): analysis of time to end of next-line therapy in JAVELIN Bladder 100. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 15):4525. doi:10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.4525

Recent Videos
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Compared with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, asciminib was better tolerated in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Using bispecific antibodies before or after CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma is an area of education for community oncologists.
Bulkiness of disease did not appear to impact PFS outcomes with ibrutinib plus venetoclax in the phase 2 CAPTIVATE study.
Optimal cancer survivorship care may entail collaboration between a treating oncologist and a cancer survivorship expert.
Related Content