Financial Toxicity More Prevalent in Adolescents, Young Adults With Cancer

Fact checked by Russ Conroy
News
Article

Adolescents and young adults with cancer more commonly experience financial toxicity and unmet social needs.

“Screening for financial toxicity and ability to meet social needs is feasible in a diverse cohort of adolescents and young adults with cancer,” according to the study authors.

“Screening for financial toxicity and ability to meet social needs is feasible in a diverse cohort of adolescents and young adults with cancer,” according to the study authors.

Adolescents and young adults with cancer who experienced financial toxicity had a lower quality of life and decreased adherence to treatment, according to findings from a poster presented at the 2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Quality Care Symposium.

The mean Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) score was 23.2, with 54% of patients having COST less than 26 suggesting financial toxicity. Additionally, the regression analysis showed that patients who were of racial/ethnic minorities and those who had recent treatment had worse financial toxicity (β –4.37, P <.001; β –3.21, P <.001).

Overall, 24% of patients reported using their savings to pay for treatment, and 25% had borrowed money or took on loans. Of the 25%, 58% borrowed from friends and family. The regression analysis highlighted that a greater financial toxicity was associated with a reduced quality of life (β –0.10; P <.001), using more savings to pay for treatment (β 0.52; P <.001), and taking less medications due to cost (β 0.01; P <.001).

“Screening for financial toxicity and ability to meet social needs is feasible in a diverse cohort of adolescents and young adults with cancer,” Kaitlyn Lapen, MD, a third-year radiation oncology resident at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and colleagues wrote in the poster.

The authors stated that the incidence of cancer was rising in young adults between the ages of 18 and 39. Currently, the standards for financial toxicity and social needs screening are unknown despite adolescent and young adult cancer survivors having unique risks for poor outcomes associated with financial toxicity. The authors defined social needs as elements that influence a person’s health and well-being, such as access to housing, food, and transportation. They noted that there have been few studies exploring the relationship between financial toxicity and social needs in adolescents and young adults with cancer.

“We sought to evaluate and describe best practices in screening for financial toxicity and assessment of unmet social needs among adolescents and young adults with cancer,” the authors wrote.

Between June 2022 and August 2023, the screening assessments on financial toxicities and social needs were administered at urban comprehensive cancer centers. Additionally, multivariate linear and logistic regression tested for associations with financial toxicity and unmet social needs while also adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics.

A total of 2519 patients completed the survey, with a median age of 33.7 years, and 65% were non-Hispanic White. Of note, the most common disease sites were breast (41%), gastrointestinal (20%), and gynecologic (19%). Active cancer treatment including chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or surgery was reported in 54% of patients within 120 days of participating in the survey.

Of the patients who screened for financial toxicity, 44% accepted a referral for financial assistance. Unmet social needs in the population included clothing (1%), repairs (5%), medicine (10%), food (13%), transportation (14%), and housing (16%).

Investigators also conducted a multivariate logistic regression of factors associated with unmet social needs. Variables included male gender (adjusted OR [aOR], 0.86; 0.59-1.24; P = .422), being of a non-White minority (aOR, 2.98; 95% CI, 2.35-3.79; P <.001), and having stage IV disease (aOR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.10-5.45; P = .028).

Site of disease in this model included gastrointestinal (aOR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.63-1.34; P = .647), gynecologic (aOR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.53-1.13; P = .181), thoracic (aOR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.16-0.96; P = .040), hematologic (aOR, 1.96; 95% CI, 0.89-4.31; P = .094), and other (aOR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.10-5.45; P = .028). Additionally, recent treatment was also a factor (aOR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.88-1.46; P = .319).

Reference

Lapen K, Dee EC, Ghazal LV, et al. Financial toxicity and unmet social needs in adolescents and young adults (AYA) with cancer. JCO Oncol Pract. 2024;20(10):13. doi:10.1200/OP.2024.20.10_suppl.13

Recent Videos
Optimal cancer survivorship care may entail collaboration between a treating oncologist and a cancer survivorship expert.
Survivors of cancer may experience an increased risk of having organ, cardiac, or lung disease following prior anti-cancer therapy.
Performing ablation and injecting tumor sites with immunotherapy may be “synergistic”, according to Jason R. Williams, MD, DABR.
The FirstLook liquid biopsy, when used as an adjunct to low-dose CT, may help to address the unmet need of low lung cancer screening utilization.
An 80% sensitivity for lung cancer was observed with the liquid biopsy, with high sensitivity observed for early-stage disease, as well.
Patients who face smoking stigma, perceive a lack of insurance, or have other low-dose CT related concerns may benefit from blood testing for lung cancer.
The Together for Supportive Cancer Care coalition may advance the national conversation in ensuring comprehensive care for all patients with cancer.
Health care organizations have come together to form the Together for Supportive Cancer Care coalition to address gaps in supportive cancer care services.
Further optimizing a PROTAC that targets MDM2 may lead to human clinical trials among patients with cancer harboring p53 mutations.
Related Content