Lisa La on the Limitations of a Study Evaluating Diabetes in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Article

The clinical investigator and her colleagues sought to evaluate differences in baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes in diabetic versus nondiabetic patients enrolled in the CONNECT Multiple Myeloma Registry.

Results from a descriptive analysis of the CONNECT Multiple Myeloma Registry presented at the 2020 American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting & Exposition revealed an unmet need to provide improved supportive care for diabetes management in patients with multiple myeloma to further enhance survival outcomes.

The aim of the study was to assess differences in baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes in diabetic versus nondiabetic patients enrolled in the registry.

In an interview with CancerNetwork®, Lisa La, director of clinical research in the Center for Cancer Care at White Plains Hospital, spoke about the limitations of this study and what she believes the study offers with these in mind.

Transcription:

[As] with any observational prospective studies, this registry wasn’t specifically geared towards looking at patients with diabetes; [rather], it was just an overall prospective study. I just happened to be interested in diabetes [and] I was able to use this data set to analyze that. There was…a good amount of missing information that could have [accounted for] our limitations.

For example…there were very limited data collected for steroid administration. Again, [patients with] myeloma in general [receive] backbone chemotherapy that includes high doses of steroids. Diabetic patients can’t have such high amounts of steroids because it could cause neuropathy and [other] complications. We didn’t really capture that here in the data registry, so I really couldn’t say that there was a big difference.

Also, we know that with registries, it’s not like therapeutic clinical trials where there is constant monitoring of these data to make sure that they’re validated. I think that a lot of these registries could be lacking some tight oversight. But in general, this gives us a very good idea of what we had an inkling on [regarding] outcomes.

Recent Videos
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight the many advantages to attending the 42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference, with some additional tidbits to round out the main event.
Other ongoing urothelial cancer trials are assessing enfortumab vedotin–based combinations in the neoadjuvant setting.
Given resource scarcity, developing practice strategies for resource-constrained settings would require aid from commercial and government stakeholders.
Approximately 95% of those with a complete response to enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab were alive after 2 years in the phase 3 EV-302 trial.
Thomas Powles, MBBS, MRCP, MD, highlighted fatigue, nausea, and peripheral neuropathy as toxicities observed with enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab.
4 experts are featured in this series.
Large international meetings may facilitate conversations regarding disparities of care outside of high-income countries.
Updated findings from the phase 3 EV-302 trial show enduring responses and survival improvements with enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab.
Related Content